Bernt J von Scholten1, Philip Hasbak2, Thomas E Christensen2, Adam A Ghotbi2, Andreas Kjaer2, Peter Rossing3,4,5, Tine W Hansen3. 1. Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 2, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark. bjos@steno.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 2, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark. 4. The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) represent functional and structural aspects of atherosclerosis. We examined the prevalence of reduced CFR and high CAC scores in three predefined groups of participants without known cardiovascular disease: (1) patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria; (2) patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria; and (3) non-diabetic controls. METHODS: In a cross-sectional design, cardiac (82)Rb positron emission tomography/computed tomography was conducted in 60 patients with type 2 diabetes who were free of overt cardiovascular disease and who were stratified by normoalbuminuria (<30 mg/24 h) (n = 30; age [mean ± SD] 60.9 ± 10.1 years) and albuminuria (≥ 30 mg/24 h) (n = 30; age 65.6 ± 4.8 years), and in 30 healthy, non-diabetic controls (age 59.8 ± 9.9 years). RESULTS: In controls, normoalbuminuric and albuminuric patients, CFR was 3.0 ± 0.8, 2.6 ± 0.8 and 2.0 ± 0.5, respectively. Reduced CFR (<2.5) was observed in 16.7%, 40.0% and 83.3% of participants, respectively, and median (interquartile range) CAC scores were 0 (0-81), 36 (1-325) and 370 (152-1,025), respectively (p for trend <0.01). After adjustment, the difference in CFR and CAC between albuminuric patients and controls remained significant (p ≤ 0.001). There were trends towards lower CFR and higher CAC scores in normoalbuminuric patients vs controls (p ≤ 0.023) and towards higher CAC scores in albuminuric vs normoalbuminuric patients (p = 0.026). In multivariate regression analysis, a higher urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) tended to predict reduced CFR in the total population (p = 0.045). When the CAC score was added, there was also a trend (p = 0.032) towards an inverse association with reduced CFR. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Type 2 diabetic patients who were free of overt cardiovascular disease had a high prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction, especially with concomitant albuminuria, suggesting a common microvascular impairment occurring in multiple microvascular beds. Prospective studies are needed to show the prognostic significance of this finding.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) represent functional and structural aspects of atherosclerosis. We examined the prevalence of reduced CFR and high CAC scores in three predefined groups of participants without known cardiovascular disease: (1) patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria; (2) patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria; and (3) non-diabetic controls. METHODS: In a cross-sectional design, cardiac (82)Rb positron emission tomography/computed tomography was conducted in 60 patients with type 2 diabetes who were free of overt cardiovascular disease and who were stratified by normoalbuminuria (<30 mg/24 h) (n = 30; age [mean ± SD] 60.9 ± 10.1 years) and albuminuria (≥ 30 mg/24 h) (n = 30; age 65.6 ± 4.8 years), and in 30 healthy, non-diabetic controls (age 59.8 ± 9.9 years). RESULTS: In controls, normoalbuminuric and albuminuric patients, CFR was 3.0 ± 0.8, 2.6 ± 0.8 and 2.0 ± 0.5, respectively. Reduced CFR (<2.5) was observed in 16.7%, 40.0% and 83.3% of participants, respectively, and median (interquartile range) CAC scores were 0 (0-81), 36 (1-325) and 370 (152-1,025), respectively (p for trend <0.01). After adjustment, the difference in CFR and CAC between albuminuric patients and controls remained significant (p ≤ 0.001). There were trends towards lower CFR and higher CAC scores in normoalbuminuric patients vs controls (p ≤ 0.023) and towards higher CAC scores in albuminuric vs normoalbuminuric patients (p = 0.026). In multivariate regression analysis, a higher urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) tended to predict reduced CFR in the total population (p = 0.045). When the CAC score was added, there was also a trend (p = 0.032) towards an inverse association with reduced CFR. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Type 2 diabeticpatients who were free of overt cardiovascular disease had a high prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction, especially with concomitant albuminuria, suggesting a common microvascular impairment occurring in multiple microvascular beds. Prospective studies are needed to show the prognostic significance of this finding.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Bernt Johan von Scholten; Henrik Reinhard; Tine Willum Hansen; Morten Lindhardt; Claus Leth Petersen; Niels Wiinberg; Peter Riis Hansen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Peter Karl Jacobsen; Peter Rossing Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Christina Byrne; Philip Hasbak; Andreas Kjaer; Jens Jakob Thune; Lars Køber Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Aleksandar Kibel; Kristina Selthofer-Relatic; Ines Drenjancevic; Tatjana Bacun; Ivica Bosnjak; Dijana Kibel; Mario Gros Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Ida K B Rasmussen; Philip Hasbak; Bernt J von Scholten; Jens C Laursen; Emilie H Zobel; Lars Jorge Diaz; Lene Holmvang; Rasmus S Ripa; Peter Rossing; Andreas Kjaer; Tine W Hansen Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Naja Dam Mygind; Marie Mide Michelsen; Adam Pena; Abbas Ali Qayyum; Daria Frestad; Thomas Emil Christensen; Adam Ali Ghotbi; Nynne Dose; Rebekka Faber; Niels Vejlstrup; Philip Hasbak; Andreas Kjaer; Eva Prescott; Jens Kastrup Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Bernt Johan von Scholten; Alexander Rosendahl; Philip Hasbak; Regine Bergholdt; Andreas Kjaer; Peter Rossing; Tine W Hansen Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 9.951