Literature DB >> 29285726

Myocardial perfusion in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study using Rubidium-82 PET/CT.

Christina Byrne1,2,3, Philip Hasbak4, Andreas Kjaer4,5, Jens Jakob Thune6, Lars Køber7,5.   

Abstract

Both patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) often have reduced myocardial blood flow without significant coronary atherosclerosis. However, the mechanisms are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perfusion is reduced additionally when the 2 are combined. In a cross-sectional study, we scanned patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure with and without T2DM using Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography at rest and adenosine-induced stress, thereby obtaining the myocardial flow reserve (myocardial flow reserve (MFR) = stress flow/rest flow) as a measure of the myocardial vasomotor function; 28 patients with T2DM and 123 without T2DM were included. All patients received heart failure treatment according to guidelines. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the association between T2DM and MFR. Age [68 (60-75) years vs. 68 (62-72) years; P = 0.84] and female sex (21% vs. 33%; P = 0.26) were similar between patients with and without T2DM. Patients with T2DM had higher body mass index, (29.9 vs. 26.5 kg/m2; P = 0.02), higher blood glucose (6.2 vs. 5.7 mmol/L; P = 0.03), more often hypertension (50 vs. 27%; P = 0.02) and received more cholesterol lowering medication (61 vs. 35%; P = 0.02). Apart from this, the groups were similar. In a multivariable analysis, MFR was 16% lower in patients with T2DM compared with patients without [estimate - 16%; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 29 to - 0.7%; P = 0.04]. Patients with T2DM and systolic heart failure have lower myocardial flow reserve compared with heart failure patients without T2DM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Failure; Myocardial perfusion; Non-ischaemic systolic heart; Positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29285726     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1295-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  29 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Hemodynamic effects of an irregular sequence of ventricular cycle lengths during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  D M Clark; V J Plumb; A E Epstein; G N Kay
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  The imbalance between oxygen demand and supply as a potential mechanism in the pathophysiology of heart failure: the role of microvascular growth and abnormalities.

Authors:  Rudolf A De Boer; Yigal M Pinto; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Quantification of coronary flow reserve in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and its association with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Maulik D Majmudar; Venkatesh L Murthy; Ravi V Shah; Swathy Kolli; Negareh Mousavi; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Arkadiusz Sitek; Lynne W Stevenson; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  PET abnormalities in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  James O O'Neill; Patrick M McCarthy; Richard C Brunken; Tiffany Buda; Katherine Hoercher; James B Young; Randall C Starling
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Prognostic Implications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Isabelle Johansson; Ulf Dahlström; Magnus Edner; Per Näsman; Lars Rydén; Anna Norhammar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Myocardial perfusion in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with and without atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Felix T Range; Matthias Paul; Klaus P Schäfers; Tayfun Acil; Peter Kies; Sven Hermann; Otmar Schober; Günter Breithardt; Thomas Wichter; Michael A Schäfers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P J Nahser; R E Brown; H Oskarsson; M D Winniford; J D Rossen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.