Literature DB >> 26523335

High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints.

Sajad Arabnejad1, R Burnett Johnston1, Jenny Ann Pura2, Baljinder Singh1, Michael Tanzer3, Damiano Pasini4.   

Abstract

High-strength fully porous biomaterials built with additive manufacturing provide an exciting opportunity for load-bearing orthopedic applications. While factors controlling their mechanical and biological response have recently been the subject of intense research, the interplay between mechanical properties, bone ingrowth requirements, and manufacturing constraints, is still unclear. In this paper, we present two high-strength stretch-dominated topologies, the Tetrahedron and the Octet truss, as well as an intuitive visualization method to understand the relationship of cell topology, pore size, porosity with constraints imposed by bone ingrowth requirements and additive manufacturing. 40 samples of selected porosities are fabricated using Selective Laser Melting (SLM), and their morphological deviations resulting from SLM are assessed via micro-CT. Mechanical compression testing is used to obtain stiffness and strength properties, whereas bone ingrowth is assessed in a canine in vivo model at four and eight weeks. The results show that the maximum strength and stiffness ranged from 227.86±10.15 to 31.37±2.19MPa and 4.58±0.18 to 1.23±0.40GPa respectively, and the maximum 0.2% offset strength is almost 5 times stronger than that of tantalum foam. For Tetrahedron samples, bone ingrowth after four and eight weeks is 28.6%±11.6%, and 41.3%±4.3%, while for the Octet truss 35.5%±1.9% and 56.9%±4.0% respectively. This research is the first to demonstrate the occurrence of bone ingrowth into high-strength porous biomaterials which have higher structural efficiency than current porous biomaterials in the market. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We present two stretch-dominated cell topologies for porous biomaterials that can be used for load-bearing orthopaedic applications, and prove that they encourage bone ingrowth in a canine model. We also introduce an intuitive method to visualize and understand the relationship of cell topology, pore size, porosity with constraints imposed by bone ingrowth requirements and additive manufacturing. We show this strategy helps to gain insight into the interaction of exogenous implant factors and endogenous system factors that can affect the success of load-bearing orthopaedic devices.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacturing; Bone ingrowth; Lattice materials; Mechanical properties; Porous biomaterials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26523335     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  38 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review.

Authors:  Qingge Wang; Peng Zhou; Shifeng Liu; Shokouh Attarilar; Robin Lok-Wang Ma; Yinsheng Zhong; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Three-dimensional polymer coated 45S5-type bioactive glass scaffolds seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells show bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  Fabian Westhauser; Christian Weis; Matthäus Prokscha; Leonie A Bittrich; Wei Li; Kai Xiao; Ulrich Kneser; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Aldo R Boccaccini; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  [Effect of porous zirconia ceramics on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts].

Authors:  Z Wang; Q Ding; Y Gao; Q Q Ma; L Zhang; X Y Ge; Y C Sun; Q F Xie
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 4.  Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi; Masoud Zhianmanesh; Osezua Ibhadode; Shahriar Imani Shahabad; Reza Esmaeilizadeh; Einollah Sarikhani; Sahar Toorandaz; Shima A Sarabi; Rohollah Nasiri; Yangzhi Zhu; Javad Kadkhodapour; Bingbing Li; Ali Khademhosseini; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Influence of alumina substrates open porosity on calcium phosphates formation produced by the biomimetic method.

Authors:  Isabela R Lavagnini; João V Campos; Denise Osiro; Julieta A Ferreira; Luiz A Colnago; Eliria M J A Pallone
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2022-06-23

6.  On the Morphological Deviation in Additive Manufacturing of Porous Ti6Al4V Scaffold: A Design Consideration.

Authors:  Seyed Ataollah Naghavi; Haoyu Wang; Swastina Nath Varma; Maryam Tamaddon; Arsalan Marghoub; Rex Galbraith; Jane Galbraith; Mehran Moazen; Jia Hua; Wei Xu; Chaozong Liu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Parametric Design of Hip Implant With Gradient Porous Structure.

Authors:  Xiangsheng Gao; Yuhang Zhao; Min Wang; Ziyu Liu; Chaozong Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-16

8.  3d Tissue Engineered In Vitro Models Of Cancer In Bone.

Authors:  Anna M Sitarski; Heather Fairfield; Carolyne Falank; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 9.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications.

Authors:  Amit M E Arefin; Nava Raj Khatri; Nitin Kulkarni; Paul F Egan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.