Rachel A Rodenbach1, Kyle E Rodenbach2, Mohamedtaki A Tejani3, Ronald M Epstein4. 1. University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Electronic address: rachel_rodenbach@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. 4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, 1381 South Ave, Rochester, NY 14620, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinician discomfort with death may affect care of patients but has not been well-studied. This study explores oncology clinicians' attitudes surrounding their own death and how these attitudes both affect and are affected by their care of dying patients and their communication with them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews with physicians (n=25), nurse practitioners (n=7), and physician assistants (n=1) in medical or hematologic oncology clinical practices about communication styles, care of terminally ill patients, and personal perspectives about mortality. RESULTS: Clinicians described three communication styles used with patients about death and dying: direct, indirect, or selectively direct. Most reported an acceptance of their mortality that was "conditional," meaning that that they could not fully know how they would respond if actually terminally ill. For many clinicians, caring for dying patients affected their outlook on life and death, and their own perspectives on life and death affected their approach to caring for dying patients. CONCLUSION: An awareness of personal mortality may help clinicians to discuss death more openly with patients and to provide better care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to promote self-awareness and communication training are key to facilitating clear communication with and compassionate care of terminally ill patients.
OBJECTIVE: Clinician discomfort with death may affect care of patients but has not been well-studied. This study explores oncology clinicians' attitudes surrounding their own death and how these attitudes both affect and are affected by their care of dying patients and their communication with them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews with physicians (n=25), nurse practitioners (n=7), and physician assistants (n=1) in medical or hematologic oncology clinical practices about communication styles, care of terminally ill patients, and personal perspectives about mortality. RESULTS: Clinicians described three communication styles used with patients about death and dying: direct, indirect, or selectively direct. Most reported an acceptance of their mortality that was "conditional," meaning that that they could not fully know how they would respond if actually terminally ill. For many clinicians, caring for dying patients affected their outlook on life and death, and their own perspectives on life and death affected their approach to caring for dying patients. CONCLUSION: An awareness of personal mortality may help clinicians to discuss death more openly with patients and to provide better care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to promote self-awareness and communication training are key to facilitating clear communication with and compassionate care of terminally ill patients.
Authors: J C Weeks; E F Cook; S J O'Day; L M Peterson; N Wenger; D Reding; F E Harrell; P Kussin; N V Dawson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-06-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L M Ramondetta; G Tortolero-Luna; D C Bodurka; D Sills; K Basen-Engquist; J Gano; C Levenback Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Benjamin P Chapman; Michael Hoerger; Fahad Saeed; Elizabeth Guancial; Jennifer W Mack Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-07-10
Authors: Rachel A Rodenbach; Sally A Norton; Marsha N Wittink; Supriya Mohile; Holly G Prigerson; Paul R Duberstein; Ronald M Epstein Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-12-12
Authors: Fahad Saeed; Susan A Ladwig; Ronald M Epstein; Rebeca D Monk; Paul R Duberstein Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Richard L Kravitz; Joshua J Fenton; Guibo Xing; Daniel J Tancredi; Michael Hoerger; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton; Holly G Prigerson; Ronald M Epstein Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Karina Croucher; Lindsey Büster; Jennifer Dayes; Laura Green; Justine Raynsford; Louise Comerford Boyes; Christina Faull Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein; Joshua J Fenton; Kevin Fiscella; Michael Hoerger; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Robert Gramling; Supriya Mohile; Peter Franks; Paul Kaesberg; Sandy Plumb; Camille S Cipri; Richard L Street; Cleveland G Shields; Anthony L Back; Phyllis Butow; Adam Walczak; Martin Tattersall; Alison Venuti; Peter Sullivan; Mark Robinson; Beth Hoh; Linda Lewis; Richard L Kravitz Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 31.777