Literature DB >> 33373412

Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage.

Karina Croucher1, Lindsey Büster1,2, Jennifer Dayes3, Laura Green4, Justine Raynsford5, Louise Comerford Boyes6, Christina Faull7.   

Abstract

While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status-'taboo' being a theme evident in some participants' own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33373412      PMCID: PMC7771686          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  19 in total

1.  Mindful practice.

Authors:  R M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A retrospective analysis of preferred and actual place of death for hospice patients.

Authors:  Laura Holdsworth; Simon Fisher
Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs       Date:  2010-09

3.  Are pedagogies used in nurse education research evident in practice?

Authors:  H T Allan; P Smith
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Preferred Place of Care and Death in Terminally Ill Patients with Lung and Heart Disease Compared to Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marianne H Skorstengaard; Mette A Neergaard; Pernille Andreassen; Trine Brogaard; Elisabeth Bendstrup; Anders Løkke; Susanne Aagaard; Henrik Wiggers; Per Bech; Anders B Jensen
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Where people die (1974--2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  GPs' perceptions of advance care planning with frail and older people: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tim Sharp; Alexandra Malyon; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Factors associated with variation in hospital use at the end of life in England.

Authors:  Martin Bardsley; Theo Georghiou; Ruth Spence; John Billings
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  Exploring preferences for place of death with terminally ill patients: qualitative study of experiences of general practitioners and community nurses in England.

Authors:  Daniel Munday; Mila Petrova; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-15

9.  How death anxiety impacts nurses' caring for patients at the end of life: a review of literature.

Authors:  L Peters; R Cant; S Payne; M O'Connor; F McDermott; K Hood; J Morphet; K Shimoinaba
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 10.  Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death.

Authors:  Sarah Hoare; Zoë Slote Morris; Michael P Kelly; Isla Kuhn; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: bringing death back into life.

Authors:  Libby Sallnow; Richard Smith; Sam H Ahmedzai; Afsan Bhadelia; Charlotte Chamberlain; Yali Cong; Brett Doble; Luckson Dullie; Robin Durie; Eric A Finkelstein; Sam Guglani; Melanie Hodson; Bettina S Husebø; Allan Kellehear; Celia Kitzinger; Felicia Marie Knaul; Scott A Murray; Julia Neuberger; Seamus O'Mahony; M R Rajagopal; Sarah Russell; Eriko Sase; Katherine E Sleeman; Sheldon Solomon; Ros Taylor; Mpho Tutu van Furth; Katrina Wyatt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  An Ethnography Study of a Viral YouTube Educational Video in Ecuador: Dealing With Death and Grief in Times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Lydia Giménez-Llort
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.