Ronald M Epstein1, Paul R Duberstein2, Joshua J Fenton3, Kevin Fiscella4, Michael Hoerger5, Daniel J Tancredi6, Guibo Xing7, Robert Gramling8, Supriya Mohile9, Peter Franks10, Paul Kaesberg11, Sandy Plumb12, Camille S Cipri7, Richard L Street13, Cleveland G Shields14, Anthony L Back15, Phyllis Butow16, Adam Walczak17, Martin Tattersall18, Alison Venuti12, Peter Sullivan12, Mark Robinson19, Beth Hoh20, Linda Lewis7, Richard L Kravitz21. 1. Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York2Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York3Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York4James P Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. 2. Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York2Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York3Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. 3. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento6UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento7Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 4. Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York2Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York8Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York9Center for Community Health, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York10Departments of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana11Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana. 6. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento12Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 7. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 8. Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York2Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York8Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York13School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York14Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. 9. James P Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York15Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. 10. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 11. UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento16Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 12. Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. 13. Department of Communication, Texas A & M University, College Station18Houston Center for Healthcare Innovation, Quality, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas19Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 14. Human Development and Family Studies Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana21Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana22Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana23Center on Poverty and Health Inequities, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana24College of Health of Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. 15. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle26Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle. 16. Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia28Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 17. Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia29School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 18. Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia30Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia31Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 19. University of California, Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 20. Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York2Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York34Department of Social Work, Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, New York. 21. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento6UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento35Division of General Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Observational studies demonstrate links between patient-centered communication, quality of life (QOL), and aggressive treatments in advanced cancer, yet few randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of communication interventions have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a combined intervention involving oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and caregivers would promote patient-centered communication, and to estimate intervention effects on shared understanding, patient-physician relationships, QOL, and aggressive treatments in the last 30 days of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster RCT at community- and hospital-based cancer clinics in Western New York and Northern California; 38 medical oncologists (mean age 44.6 years; 11 (29%) female) and 265 community-dwelling adult patients with advanced nonhematologic cancer participated (mean age, 64.4 years, 146 [55.0%] female, 235 [89%] white; enrolled August 2012 to June 2014; followed for 3 years); 194 patients had participating caregivers. INTERVENTIONS: Oncologists received individualized communication training using standardized patient instructors while patients received question prompt lists and individualized communication coaching to identify issues to address during an upcoming oncologist visit. Both interventions focused on engaging patients in consultations, responding to emotions, informing patients about prognosis and treatment choices, and balanced framing of information. Control participants received no training. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was a composite measure of patient-centered communication coded from audio recordings of the first oncologist visit following patient coaching (intervention group) or enrollment (control). Secondary outcomes included the patient-physician relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, QOL, and aggressive treatments and hospice use in the last 30 days of life. RESULTS: Data from 38 oncologists (19 randomized to intervention) and 265 patients (130 intervention) were analyzed. In fully adjusted models, the intervention resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements in the primary physician-patient communication end point (adjusted intervention effect, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.06-0.62; P = .02). Differences in secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A combined intervention that included oncologist communication training and coaching for patients with advanced cancer was effective in improving patient-centered communication but did not affect secondary outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01485627.
IMPORTANCE: Observational studies demonstrate links between patient-centered communication, quality of life (QOL), and aggressive treatments in advanced cancer, yet few randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of communication interventions have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a combined intervention involving oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and caregivers would promote patient-centered communication, and to estimate intervention effects on shared understanding, patient-physician relationships, QOL, and aggressive treatments in the last 30 days of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster RCT at community- and hospital-based cancer clinics in Western New York and Northern California; 38 medical oncologists (mean age 44.6 years; 11 (29%) female) and 265 community-dwelling adult patients with advanced nonhematologic cancer participated (mean age, 64.4 years, 146 [55.0%] female, 235 [89%] white; enrolled August 2012 to June 2014; followed for 3 years); 194 patients had participating caregivers. INTERVENTIONS: Oncologists received individualized communication training using standardized patient instructors while patients received question prompt lists and individualized communication coaching to identify issues to address during an upcoming oncologist visit. Both interventions focused on engaging patients in consultations, responding to emotions, informing patients about prognosis and treatment choices, and balanced framing of information. Control participants received no training. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was a composite measure of patient-centered communication coded from audio recordings of the first oncologist visit following patient coaching (intervention group) or enrollment (control). Secondary outcomes included the patient-physician relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, QOL, and aggressive treatments and hospice use in the last 30 days of life. RESULTS: Data from 38 oncologists (19 randomized to intervention) and 265 patients (130 intervention) were analyzed. In fully adjusted models, the intervention resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements in the primary physician-patient communication end point (adjusted intervention effect, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.06-0.62; P = .02). Differences in secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A combined intervention that included oncologist communication training and coaching for patients with advanced cancer was effective in improving patient-centered communication but did not affect secondary outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01485627.
Authors: Aneta Dimoska; Martin H N Tattersall; Phyllis N Butow; Heather Shepherd; Paul Kinnersley Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Sonal Admane; Emily R Gallagher; Vicki A Jackson; Thomas J Lynch; Inga T Lennes; Connie M Dahlin; William F Pirl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jane C Weeks; Paul J Catalano; Angel Cronin; Matthew D Finkelman; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating; Deborah Schrag Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amber E Barnato; Max H Farrell; Chung-Chou H Chang; Judith R Lave; Mark S Roberts; Derek C Angus Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Adam Walczak; Inge Henselmans; Martin H N Tattersall; Josephine M Clayton; Patricia M Davidson; Jane Young; Frances A Bellemore; Ronald M Epstein; Phyllis N Butow Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Paul K Maciejewski; Ronald M Epstein; Joshua J Fenton; Benjamin Chapman; Sally A Norton; Michael Hoerger; Marsha N Wittink; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Supriya Mohile; Richard L Kravitz; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Benjamin P Chapman; Michael Hoerger; Fahad Saeed; Elizabeth Guancial; Jennifer W Mack Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-07-10
Authors: Rachel A Rodenbach; Sally A Norton; Marsha N Wittink; Supriya Mohile; Holly G Prigerson; Paul R Duberstein; Ronald M Epstein Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-12-12
Authors: Lisa M Lowenstein; Robert J Volk; Richard Street; Marie Flannery; Allison Magnuson; Ronald Epstein; Supriya G Mohile Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Jeremy DeMartini; Joshua J Fenton; Ronald Epstein; Paul Duberstein; Camille Cipri; Daniel Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Paul Kaesberg; Richard L Kravitz Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Deena R Levine; Erik Liederbach; Liza-Marie Johnson; Erica C Kaye; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Belinda Mandrell; Michele Pritchard; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Dave Wendler; Justin N Baker Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Charlotte Healy; Peter Martin; Beverly Canin; Karl Pillemer; Jo Anne Sirey; M Cary Reid Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.599