Literature DB >> 26518316

Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program.

Julia C Gage1, William C Hunt2, Mark Schiffman1, Hormuzd A Katki1, Li C Cheung3, Jack Cuzick4, Orrin Myers5, Philip E Castle6, Cosette M Wheeler7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for cervical cancer screening have incorporated comparative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cancer (CIN3(+)) for various screening outcomes to determine management. Few cohorts are large enough to distinguish CIN3(+) risks among women with minor abnormalities versus negative cytology because of low incidence. The New Mexico Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Pap Registry offers a unique opportunity to evaluate cervical cancer screening in a diverse population across a broad-spectrum of health service delivery.
METHODS: Kaplan-Meier and logistic-Weibull survival models were used to estimate cumulative risks of CIN3(+) among women ages 21 to 64 who were screened in New Mexico between 2007 and 2011 with negative, equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology, that is, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US; with or without HPV triage), or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL).
RESULTS: We identified 452,045 women meeting the selection criteria. The 3-year CIN3(+) risks for women with negative, ASC-US, and LSIL cytology were 0.30%, 2.6%, and 5.2%, respectively. HPV triage of ASC-US stratified 3-year CIN3(+) risks were 0.72% for HPV-negative and 7.7% for HPV-positive. Risks tended to decline after age 30 for all screening results.
CONCLUSIONS: In this state-wide population-based cohort, cytology and HPV triage of ASC-US stratified women's CIN3(+) risk into similar patterns observed previously, suggesting the validity of screening guidelines for diverse populations in the United States. Absolute risk estimates should be compared across other large populations. IMPACT: Strategies for HPV triage of ASC-US derived from clinical trials are upheld in large clinical practice settings and across diverse screening populations in the United States. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26518316      PMCID: PMC4852208          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  20 in total

1.  Submucous lipoma of the colon.

Authors:  I W KAPLAN; R MEIER
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1959-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  A population-based study of human papillomavirus genotype prevalence in the United States: baseline measures prior to mass human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Cosette M Wheeler; William C Hunt; Jack Cuzick; Erika Langsfeld; Amanda Pearse; George D Montoya; Michael Robertson; Catherine A Shearman; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  The known unknowns of HPV natural history.

Authors:  Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The low risk of precancer after a screening result of human papillomavirus-negative/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance papanicolaou and implications for clinical management.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Catherine Behrens; Abha Sharma; Fang-Hui Zhao; Jack Cuzick; Zi Hua Yang; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The correlation between human papillomavirus positivity and abnormal cervical cytology result differs by age among perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Michelle I Silver; Anne Burke; Raphael Viscidi; Kathryn Chang; Cindy M P Duke; Wen Shen; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A population-based evaluation of cervical screening in the United States: 2008-2011.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; William C Hunt; Michael Robertson; Nancy E Joste; Philip E Castle; Vicki B Benard; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Progressive potential of mild cervical atypia: prospective cytological, colposcopic, and virological study.

Authors:  M J Campion; D J McCance; J Cuzick; A Singer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study.

Authors:  Joakim Dillner; Matejka Rebolj; Philippe Birembaut; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Anne Szarewski; Christian Munk; Silvia de Sanjose; Pontus Naucler; Belen Lloveras; Susanne Kjaer; Jack Cuzick; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Christine Clavel; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-13
View more
  6 in total

1.  Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Xiaonan Xue; Li C Cheung; Julia C Gage; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas S Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Three-year risk of high-grade CIN for women aged 30 years or older who undergo baseline Pap cytology and HPV co-screening.

Authors:  Ming Guo; Abha Khanna; Jianping Wang; Marilyn A Dawlett; Teresa L Kologinczak; Genevieve R Lyons; Roland L Bassett; Nour Sneige; Yun Gong; Therese B Bevers
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Cervical cancer screening intervals and management for women living with HIV: a risk benchmarking approach.

Authors:  Hilary A Robbins; Howard D Strickler; L Stewart Massad; Christopher B Pierce; Teresa M Darragh; Howard Minkoff; Marla J Keller; Margaret Fischl; Joel Palefsky; Lisa Flowers; Lisa Rahangdale; Joel Milam; Sadeep Shrestha; Christine Colie; Gypsyamber DʼSouza
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Population-based e-records to evaluate HPV triage of screen-detected atypical squamous cervical lesions in Catalonia, Spain, 2010-15.

Authors:  Silvia de Sanjosé; Vanesa Rodríguez-Salés; Xavier F Bosch; Raquel Ibañez; Laia Bruni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  High-risk Human Papillomavirus Testing in Young Japanese Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance.

Authors:  Takashi Mitamura; Yosuke Konno; Satomi Kikawa; Yutaka Iwaki; Kurumi Iwaki; Fumie Tanuma; Soromon Kataoka
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Bayesian analysis of baseline risk of CIN2 and ≥CIN3 by HPV genotype in a European referral cohort.

Authors:  Jesper Bonde; Fabio Bottari; Valentin Parvu; Helle Pedersen; Karen Yanson; Anna D Iacobone; Salma Kodsi; Fabio Landoni; Laurence Vaughan; Ditte M Ejegod; Maria T Sandri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.396

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.