Hilary A Robbins1, Howard D Strickler, L Stewart Massad, Christopher B Pierce, Teresa M Darragh, Howard Minkoff, Marla J Keller, Margaret Fischl, Joel Palefsky, Lisa Flowers, Lisa Rahangdale, Joel Milam, Sadeep Shrestha, Christine Colie, Gypsyamber DʼSouza. 1. aJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland bAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York City, New York cWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri dUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California eMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York City, New York fUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida gGrady Memorial Hospital and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia hUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina iUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California jUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama kGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We suggested cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV (WLHIV) by comparing their precancer risks to general population women, and then compared our suggestions with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. DESIGN: We compared risks of biopsy-confirmed cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (bHSIL+), calculated among WLHIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, to 'risk benchmarks' for specific management strategies in the general population. METHODS: We applied parametric survival models among 2423 WLHIV with negative or atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology during 2000-2015. Separately, we synthesized published general population bHSIL+ risks to generate 3-year risk benchmarks for a 3-year return (after negative cytology, i.e. 'rescreening threshold'), a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and immediate colposcopy [after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)]. RESULTS: Average 3-year bHSIL+ risks among general population women ('risk benchmarks') were 0.69% for a 3-year return (after negative cytology), 8.8% for a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and 14.4% for colposcopy (after LSIL). Most CDC guidelines for WLHIV were supported by comparing risks in WLHIV to these benchmarks, including a 3-year return with CD4 greater than 500 cells/μl and after either three negative cytology tests or a negative cytology/oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (all 3-year risks≤1.3%); a 1-year return after negative cytology with either positive oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (1-year risk = 1.0%) or CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl (1-year risk = 1.1%); and a 6-12-month return after ASC-US (3-year risk = 8.2% if CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl; 10.4% if CD4 cell count = 350-499 cells/μl). Other suggestions differed modestly from current guidelines, including colposcopy (vs. 6-12 month return) for WLHIV with ASC-US and CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl (3-year risk = 16.4%) and a lengthened 2-year (vs. 1-year) interval after negative cytology with CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl (2-year risk = 0.98%). CONCLUSIONS: Current cervical cancer screening guidelines for WLHIV are largely appropriate. CD4 cell count may inform risk-tailored strategies.
OBJECTIVE: We suggested cervical cancer screening strategies for women living with HIV (WLHIV) by comparing their precancer risks to general population women, and then compared our suggestions with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. DESIGN: We compared risks of biopsy-confirmed cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (bHSIL+), calculated among WLHIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, to 'risk benchmarks' for specific management strategies in the general population. METHODS: We applied parametric survival models among 2423 WLHIV with negative or atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology during 2000-2015. Separately, we synthesized published general population bHSIL+ risks to generate 3-year risk benchmarks for a 3-year return (after negative cytology, i.e. 'rescreening threshold'), a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and immediate colposcopy [after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)]. RESULTS: Average 3-year bHSIL+ risks among general population women ('risk benchmarks') were 0.69% for a 3-year return (after negative cytology), 8.8% for a 6-12-month return (after ASC-US), and 14.4% for colposcopy (after LSIL). Most CDC guidelines for WLHIV were supported by comparing risks in WLHIV to these benchmarks, including a 3-year return with CD4 greater than 500 cells/μl and after either three negative cytology tests or a negative cytology/oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (all 3-year risks≤1.3%); a 1-year return after negative cytology with either positive oncogenic human papillomavirus cotest (1-year risk = 1.0%) or CD4 cell count less than 500 cells/μl (1-year risk = 1.1%); and a 6-12-month return after ASC-US (3-year risk = 8.2% if CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl; 10.4% if CD4 cell count = 350-499 cells/μl). Other suggestions differed modestly from current guidelines, including colposcopy (vs. 6-12 month return) for WLHIV with ASC-US and CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μl (3-year risk = 16.4%) and a lengthened 2-year (vs. 1-year) interval after negative cytology with CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/μl (2-year risk = 0.98%). CONCLUSIONS: Current cervical cancer screening guidelines for WLHIV are largely appropriate. CD4 cell count may inform risk-tailored strategies.
Authors: Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Tina Raine-Bennett; Julia C Gage; Walter K Kinney Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Julia C Gage; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marla J Keller; Robert D Burk; Xianhong Xie; Kathryn Anastos; L Stewart Massad; Howard Minkoff; Xiaonan Xue; Gypsyamber D'Souza; D Heather Watts; Alexandra M Levine; Philip E Castle; Christine Colie; Joel M Palefsky; Howard D Strickler Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L Stewart Massad; Xianhong Xie; Robert Burk; Marla J Keller; Howard Minkoff; Gypsyamber DʼSouza; D Heather Watts; Joel Palefsky; Mary Young; Alexandra M Levine; Mardge Cohen; Howard D Strickler Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Teresa M Darragh; Terence J Colgan; J Thomas Cox; Debra S Heller; Michael R Henry; Ronald D Luff; Timothy McCalmont; Ritu Nayar; Joel M Palefsky; Mark H Stoler; Edward J Wilkinson; Richard J Zaino; David C Wilbur Journal: Int J Gynecol Pathol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: L Stewart Massad; Eric C Seaberg; Rodney L Wright; Teresa Darragh; Yi-Chun Lee; Christine Colie; Robert Burk; Howard D Strickler; D Heather Watts Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Keri N Althoff; Kate Buchacz; H Irene Hall; Jinbing Zhang; David B Hanna; Peter Rebeiro; Stephen J Gange; Richard D Moore; Mari M Kitahata; Kelly A Gebo; Jeffrey Martin; Amy C Justice; Michael A Horberg; Robert S Hogg; Timothy R Sterling; Angela Cescon; Marina B Klein; Jennifer E Thorne; Heidi M Crane; Michael J Mugavero; Sonia Napravnik; Gregory D Kirk; Lisa P Jacobson; John T Brooks Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Howard Minkoff; Ye Zhong; Robert D Burk; Joel M Palefsky; Xiaonan Xue; D Heather Watts; Alexandra M Levine; Rodney L Wright; Christine Colie; Gypsyamber D'Souza; L Stewart Massad; Howard D Strickler Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Maria Demarco; Didem Egemen; Noorie Hyun; Xiaojian Chen; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Li Cheung; Olivia Carter-Pokras; Anne Hammer; Julia C Gage; Megan A Clarke; Philip E Castle; Brian Befano; Jie Chen; Cher Dallal; Xin He; Kanan Desai; Thomas Lorey; Nancy Poitras; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Rebecca B Perkins; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Gypsyamber D'Souza; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Lorie Benning; Joseph B Margolick; Adebola A Adedimeji; Adaora A Adimora; Maria L Alcaide; Mardge H Cohen; Roger Detels; M Reuel Friedman; Susan Holman; Deborah J Konkle-Parker; Daniel Merenstein; Igho Ofotokun; Frank Palella; Sean Altekruse; Todd T Brown; Phyllis C Tien Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 5.363