BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease, but current treatments are not based on molecular stratification. We hypothesized that metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancers with DNA-repair defects would respond to poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 trial in which patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with olaparib tablets at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was the response rate, defined either as an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or as a reduction of at least 50% in the prostate-specific antigen level or a confirmed reduction in the circulating tumor-cell count from 5 or more cells per 7.5 ml of blood to less than 5 cells per 7.5 ml. Targeted next-generation sequencing, exome and transcriptome analysis, and digital polymerase-chain-reaction testing were performed on samples from mandated tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients were enrolled; all had received prior treatment with docetaxel, 49 (98%) had received abiraterone or enzalutamide, and 29 (58%) had received cabazitaxel. Sixteen of 49 patients who could be evaluated had a response (33%; 95% confidence interval, 20 to 48), with 12 patients receiving the study treatment for more than 6 months. Next-generation sequencing identified homozygous deletions, deleterious mutations, or both in DNA-repair genes--including BRCA1/2, ATM, Fanconi's anemia genes, and CHEK2--in 16 of 49 patients who could be evaluated (33%). Of these 16 patients, 14 (88%) had a response to olaparib, including all 7 patients with BRCA2 loss (4 with biallelic somatic loss, and 3 with germline mutations) and 4 of 5 with ATM aberrations. The specificity of the biomarker suite was 94%. Anemia (in 10 of the 50 patients [20%]) and fatigue (in 6 [12%]) were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, findings that are consistent with previous studies of olaparib. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib in patients whose prostate cancers were no longer responding to standard treatments and who had defects in DNA-repair genes led to a high response rate. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682772; Cancer Research UK number, CRUK/11/029.).
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease, but current treatments are not based on molecular stratification. We hypothesized that metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancers with DNA-repair defects would respond to poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 trial in which patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with olaparib tablets at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was the response rate, defined either as an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or as a reduction of at least 50% in the prostate-specific antigen level or a confirmed reduction in the circulating tumor-cell count from 5 or more cells per 7.5 ml of blood to less than 5 cells per 7.5 ml. Targeted next-generation sequencing, exome and transcriptome analysis, and digital polymerase-chain-reaction testing were performed on samples from mandated tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients were enrolled; all had received prior treatment with docetaxel, 49 (98%) had received abiraterone or enzalutamide, and 29 (58%) had received cabazitaxel. Sixteen of 49 patients who could be evaluated had a response (33%; 95% confidence interval, 20 to 48), with 12 patients receiving the study treatment for more than 6 months. Next-generation sequencing identified homozygous deletions, deleterious mutations, or both in DNA-repair genes--including BRCA1/2, ATM, Fanconi's anemia genes, and CHEK2--in 16 of 49 patients who could be evaluated (33%). Of these 16 patients, 14 (88%) had a response to olaparib, including all 7 patients with BRCA2 loss (4 with biallelic somatic loss, and 3 with germline mutations) and 4 of 5 with ATM aberrations. The specificity of the biomarker suite was 94%. Anemia (in 10 of the 50 patients [20%]) and fatigue (in 6 [12%]) were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, findings that are consistent with previous studies of olaparib. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib in patients whose prostate cancers were no longer responding to standard treatments and who had defects in DNA-repair genes led to a high response rate. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682772; Cancer Research UK number, CRUK/11/029.).
Authors: Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Amanda B Spurdle; Magtouf Gatei; Helena Kelly; Anna Marsh; Xiaoqing Chen; Karen Donn; Margaret Cummings; Dale Nyholt; Mark A Jenkins; Clare Scott; Gulietta M Pupo; Thilo Dörk; Regina Bendix; Judy Kirk; Katherine Tucker; Margaret R E McCredie; John L Hopper; Joseph Sambrook; Graham J Mann; Kum Kum Khanna Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-02-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shahneen K Sandhu; William R Schelman; George Wilding; Victor Moreno; Richard D Baird; Susana Miranda; Lucy Hylands; Ruth Riisnaes; Martin Forster; Aurelius Omlin; Nathan Kreischer; Khin Thway; Heidrun Gevensleben; Linda Sun; John Loughney; Manash Chatterjee; Carlo Toniatti; Christopher L Carpenter; Robert Iannone; Stan B Kaye; Johann S de Bono; Robert M Wenham Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nuala McCabe; Nicholas C Turner; Christopher J Lord; Katarzyna Kluzek; Aneta Bialkowska; Sally Swift; Sabrina Giavara; Mark J O'Connor; Andrew N Tutt; Małgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Z Kote-Jarai; D Leongamornlert; E Saunders; M Tymrakiewicz; E Castro; N Mahmud; M Guy; S Edwards; L O'Brien; E Sawyer; A Hall; R Wilkinson; T Dadaev; C Goh; D Easton; D Goldgar; R Eeles Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: S K Sandhu; A Omlin; L Hylands; S Miranda; L J Barber; R Riisnaes; A H Reid; G Attard; L Chen; I Kozarewa; H Gevensleben; J Campbell; K Fenwick; I Assiotis; D Olmos; T A Yap; P Fong; N Tunariu; D Koh; L R Molife; S Kaye; C J Lord; A Ashworth; J de Bono Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Junko Murai; Shar-yin N Huang; Benu Brata Das; Amelie Renaud; Yiping Zhang; James H Doroshow; Jiuping Ji; Shunichi Takeda; Yves Pommier Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Wei Fu; Hao Wang; Neeraj Agarwal; Victor Sacristan Santos; Benjamin L Maughan; Roberto Pili; Nabil Adra; Cora N Sternberg; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Scott T Tagawa; Alan H Bryce; Andrea L McNatty; Zachery R Reichert; Robert Dreicer; Oliver Sartor; Tamara L Lotan; Maha Hussain Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-04-21
Authors: Srinivas R Viswanathan; Gavin Ha; Andreas M Hoff; Jeremiah A Wala; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Christopher W Whelan; Nicholas J Haradhvala; Samuel S Freeman; Sarah C Reed; Justin Rhoades; Paz Polak; Michelle Cipicchio; Stephanie A Wankowicz; Alicia Wong; Tushar Kamath; Zhenwei Zhang; Gregory J Gydush; Denisse Rotem; J Christopher Love; Gad Getz; Stacey Gabriel; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Scott M Dehm; Peter S Nelson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Atish D Choudhury; Viktor A Adalsteinsson; Rameen Beroukhim; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Cell Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Leonard J Appleman; Jan H Beumer; Yixing Jiang; Yan Lin; Fei Ding; Shannon Puhalla; Leigh Swartz; Taofeek K Owonikoko; R Donald Harvey; Ronald Stoller; Daniel P Petro; Hussein A Tawbi; Athanassios Argiris; Sandra Strychor; Marie Pouquet; Brian Kiesel; Alice P Chen; David Gandara; Chandra P Belani; Edward Chu; Suresh S Ramalingam Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 3.333