Literature DB >> 23810788

The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib (MK4827) in BRCA mutation carriers and patients with sporadic cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial.

Shahneen K Sandhu1, William R Schelman, George Wilding, Victor Moreno, Richard D Baird, Susana Miranda, Lucy Hylands, Ruth Riisnaes, Martin Forster, Aurelius Omlin, Nathan Kreischer, Khin Thway, Heidrun Gevensleben, Linda Sun, John Loughney, Manash Chatterjee, Carlo Toniatti, Christopher L Carpenter, Robert Iannone, Stan B Kaye, Johann S de Bono, Robert M Wenham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is implicated in DNA repair and transcription regulation. Niraparib (MK4827) is an oral potent, selective PARP-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in preclinical tumour models with loss of BRCA and PTEN function. We investigated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and preliminary antitumour activity of niraparib.
METHODS: In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, we enrolled patients with advanced solid tumours at one site in the UK and two sites in the USA. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years; had a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less; had assessable disease; were not suitable to receive any established treatments; had adequate organ function; and had discontinued any previous anticancer treatments at least 4 weeks previously. In part A, cohorts of three to six patients, enriched for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, received niraparib daily at ten escalating doses from 30 mg to 400 mg in a 21-day cycle to establish the maximum tolerated dose. Dose expansion at the maximum tolerated dose was pursued in 15 patients to confirm tolerability. In part B, we further investigated the maximum tolerated dose in patients with sporadic platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer and sporadic prostate cancer. We obtained blood, circulating tumour cells, and optional paired tumour biopsies for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. Toxic effects were assessed by common toxicity criteria and tumour responses ascribed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Circulating tumour cells and archival tumour tissue in prostate patients were analysed for exploratory putative predictive biomarkers, such as loss of PTEN expression and ETS rearrangements. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00749502.
FINDINGS: Between Sept 15, 2008, and Jan 14, 2011, we enrolled 100 patients: 60 in part A and 40 in part B. 300 mg/day was established as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxic effects reported in the first cycle were grade 3 fatigue (one patient given 30 mg/day), grade 3 pneumonitis (one given 60 mg/day), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two given 400 mg/day). Common treatment-related toxic effects were anaemia (48 patients [48%]), nausea (42 [42%]), fatigue (42 [42%]), thrombocytopenia (35 [35%]), anorexia (26 [26%]), neutropenia (24 [24%]), constipation (23 [23%]), and vomiting (20 [20%]), and were predominantly grade 1 or 2. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional and the mean terminal elimination half-life was 36·4 h (range 32·8-46·0). Pharmacodynamic analyses confirmed PARP inhibition exceeded 50% at doses greater than 80 mg/day and antitumour activity was documented beyond doses of 60 mg/day. Eight (40% [95% CI 19-64]) of 20 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses, as did two (50% [7-93]) of four mutation carriers with breast cancer. Antitumour activity was also reported in sporadic high-grade serous ovarian cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and prostate cancer. We recorded no correlation between loss of PTEN expression or ETS rearrangements and measures of antitumour activity in patients with prostate cancer.
INTERPRETATION: A recommended phase 2 dose of 300 mg/day niraparib is well tolerated. Niraparib should be further assessed in inherited and sporadic cancers with homologous recombination DNA repair defects and to target PARP-mediated transcription in cancer. FUNDING: Merck Sharp and Dohme.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810788     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70240-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  208 in total

1.  Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

Authors:  Bella Kaufman; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Rita K Schmutzler; M William Audeh; Michael Friedlander; Judith Balmaña; Gillian Mitchell; Georgeta Fried; Salomon M Stemmer; Ayala Hubert; Ora Rosengarten; Mariana Steiner; Niklas Loman; Karin Bowen; Anitra Fielding; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib interacts with the PARP1 inhibitor niraparib to kill ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Laurence Booth; Jane L Roberts; Peter Samuel; Francesca Avogadri-Connors; Richard E Cutler; Alshad S Lalani; Andrew Poklepovic; Paul Dent
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Prediction of DNA Repair Inhibitor Response in Short-Term Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Organoids.

Authors:  Sarah J Hill; Brennan Decker; Emma A Roberts; Neil S Horowitz; Michael G Muto; Michael J Worley; Colleen M Feltmate; Marisa R Nucci; Elizabeth M Swisher; Huy Nguyen; Chunyu Yang; Ryuji Morizane; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Joyce F Liu; Joseph V Bonventre; Ursula A Matulonis; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 4.  Where Do We Stand on the Integration of PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Narjust Duma; Kelly C Gast; Grace M Choong; Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Ciara C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Update on the Treatment of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-04-14

Review 6.  Functional assays for analysis of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2.

Authors:  Lucia Guidugli; Aura Carreira; Sandrine M Caputo; Asa Ehlen; Alvaro Galli; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Susan L Neuhausen; Thomas V O Hansen; Fergus J Couch; Maaike P G Vreeswijk
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  The PARP inhibitors, veliparib and olaparib, are effective chemopreventive agents for delaying mammary tumor development in BRCA1-deficient mice.

Authors:  Ciric To; Eun-Hee Kim; Darlene B Royce; Charlotte R Williams; Ryan M Collins; Renee Risingsong; Michael B Sporn; Karen T Liby
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-05-09

Review 8.  Niraparib: A Review in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Young-A Heo; Sean T Duggan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.493

9.  Germline BRCA mutation evaluation in a prospective triple-negative breast cancer registry: implications for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome testing.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Jennifer R Klemp; Bruce F Kimler; Jonathan D Mahnken; Larry J Geier; Qamar J Khan; Manana Elia; Carol S Connor; Marilee K McGinness; Joshua M W Mammen; Jamie L Wagner; Claire Ward; Lori Ranallo; Catherine J Knight; Shane R Stecklein; Roy A Jensen; Carol J Fabian; Andrew K Godwin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Nuclear PARP1 expression and its prognostic significance in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Annalisa Mazzotta; Giulia Partipilo; Simona De Summa; Francesco Giotta; Giovanni Simone; Anita Mangia
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.