Literature DB >> 11830610

Dominant negative ATM mutations in breast cancer families.

Georgia Chenevix-Trench1, Amanda B Spurdle, Magtouf Gatei, Helena Kelly, Anna Marsh, Xiaoqing Chen, Karen Donn, Margaret Cummings, Dale Nyholt, Mark A Jenkins, Clare Scott, Gulietta M Pupo, Thilo Dörk, Regina Bendix, Judy Kirk, Katherine Tucker, Margaret R E McCredie, John L Hopper, Joseph Sambrook, Graham J Mann, Kum Kum Khanna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ATM gene encoding a putative protein kinase is mutated in ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T), an autosomal recessive disorder with a predisposition for cancer. Studies of A-T families suggest that female heterozygotes have an increased risk of breast cancer compared with noncarriers. However, neither linkage analyses nor mutation studies have provided supporting evidence for a role of ATM in breast cancer predisposition. Nevertheless, two recurrent ATM mutations, T7271G and IVS10-6T-->G, reportedly increase the risk of breast cancer. We examined these two ATM mutations in a population-based, case-control series of breast cancer families and multiple-case breast cancer families.
METHODS: Five hundred twenty-five or 262 case patients with breast cancer and 381 or 68 control subjects, respectively, were genotyped for the T7271G and IVS10-6T-->G ATM mutations, as were index patients from 76 non-BRCA1/2 multiple-case breast cancer families. Linkage and penetrance were analyzed. ATM protein expression and kinase activity were analyzed in lymphoblastoid cell lines from mutation carriers. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: In case and control subjects unselected for family history of breast cancer, one case patient had the T7271G mutation, and none had the IVS10-6T-->G mutation. In three multiple-case families, one of these two mutations segregated with breast cancer. The estimated average penetrance of the mutations was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32% to 90%) to age 70 years, equivalent to a 15.7-fold (95% CI = 6.4-fold to 38.0-fold) increased relative risk compared with that of the general population. Expression and activity analyses of ATM in heterozygous cell lines indicated that both mutations are dominant negative.
CONCLUSION: At least two ATM mutations are associated with a sufficiently high risk of breast cancer to be found in multiple-case breast cancer families. Full mutation analysis of the ATM gene in such families could help clarify the role of ATM in breast cancer susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11830610     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.3.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  74 in total

1.  Familial cancer 2003 - research and practice, Couran Cove, Queensland, Australia, 3-6 September 2003.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Lindeman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes.

Authors:  Roger A Greenberg; Bijan Sobhian; Shailja Pathania; Sharon B Cantor; Yoshihiro Nakatani; David M Livingston
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Attenuated presentation of ataxia-telangiectasia with familial cancer history.

Authors:  Clémence Simonin; David Devos; Isabelle Vuillaume; Bérengère de Martinville; Bernard Sablonnière; Alain Destée; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Luc Defebvre
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Joaquin Mateo; Suzanne Carreira; Shahneen Sandhu; Susana Miranda; Helen Mossop; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Dan Robinson; Aurelius Omlin; Nina Tunariu; Gunther Boysen; Nuria Porta; Penny Flohr; Alexa Gillman; Ines Figueiredo; Claire Paulding; George Seed; Suneil Jain; Christy Ralph; Andrew Protheroe; Syed Hussain; Robert Jones; Tony Elliott; Ursula McGovern; Diletta Bianchini; Jane Goodall; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Chris T Williamson; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Ruth Riisnaes; Bernardette Ebbs; Gemma Fowler; Desamparados Roda; Wei Yuan; Yi-Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Rachel Brough; Helen Pemberton; Roger A'Hern; Amanda Swain; Lakshmi P Kunju; Rosalind Eeles; Gerhardt Attard; Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth; Mark A Rubin; Karen E Knudsen; Felix Y Feng; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Emma Hall; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Risk assessment and management of high risk familial breast cancer.

Authors:  D G R Evans; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  The ATM missense mutation p.Ser49Cys (c.146C>G) and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Denise L Stredrick; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Marbin A Pineda; Parveen Bhatti; Bruce H Alexander; Michele M Doody; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Peplonska; Louise A Brinton; Stephen J Chanock; Jeffery P Struewing; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  ATM gene mutations result in both recessive and dominant expression phenotypes of genes and microRNAs.

Authors:  Denis A Smirnov; Vivian G Cheung
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Zebrafish as a model system to screen radiation modifiers.

Authors:  Misun Hwang; Cha Yong; Luigi Moretti; Bo Lu
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Hemizygosity for Atm and Brca1 influence the balance between cell transformation and apoptosis.

Authors:  Fengtao Su; Lubomir B Smilenov; Thomas Ludwig; Libin Zhou; Jiayun Zhu; Guangming Zhou; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  The ubiquitin landscape at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Troy E Messick; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.