Diansong Zhou1, Jianguo Li1, Khanh Bui1, Maria Learoyd2, Alienor Berges2, Tsveta Milenkova3, Nidal Al-Huniti1, Helen Tomkinson2, Hongmei Xu4. 1. Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Boston, MA, 02451, USA. 2. Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. 3. Global Medicine Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. 4. Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Boston, MA, 02451, USA. xu.hongmei3@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olaparib is a first-in-class potent oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this analysis were to establish an integrated population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of olaparib in patients with solid tumors and to bridge the PK of olaparib between capsule and tablet formulations. METHODS: The population PK model was developed using plasma concentration data from 659 patients in 11 phase I, II, and III studies of olaparib tablets/capsules monotherapy. Relative bioavailability between the tablet and capsule formulations was estimated and the relative exposure between olaparib tablet and capsule therapeutic doses was further assessed. RESULTS: The concentration-time profile was described using a two-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption and first-order elimination for both capsules and tablets with different absorption parameters. Multiple-dose clearance compared with single-dose clearance was reduced by approximately 15% (auto-inhibition). Disease severity had an impact on olaparib clearance, and tablet strength had an impact on Ka. The olaparib geometric mean area under the curve (AUC) and maximal concentration (Cmax) following a single 300 mg tablet were 42.1 μg h/mL and 5.8 μg/mL, respectively, and the steady-state geometric mean AUC and Cmax following a 300 mg tablet twice daily were 49.0 μg h/mL and 7.7 μg/mL, respectively. The relative exposure (AUC) of the 300 mg tablet formulation is 13% higher than the 400 mg capsule formulation. CONCLUSION: This analysis bridged the olaparib capsule and tablet formulation PK and provided key assessment to support the approval of the olaparib tablet formulation in patients with ovarian cancer, regardless of their BRCA mutation status.
BACKGROUND:Olaparib is a first-in-class potent oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this analysis were to establish an integrated population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of olaparib in patients with solid tumors and to bridge the PK of olaparib between capsule and tablet formulations. METHODS: The population PK model was developed using plasma concentration data from 659 patients in 11 phase I, II, and III studies of olaparib tablets/capsules monotherapy. Relative bioavailability between the tablet and capsule formulations was estimated and the relative exposure between olaparib tablet and capsule therapeutic doses was further assessed. RESULTS: The concentration-time profile was described using a two-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption and first-order elimination for both capsules and tablets with different absorption parameters. Multiple-dose clearance compared with single-dose clearance was reduced by approximately 15% (auto-inhibition). Disease severity had an impact on olaparib clearance, and tablet strength had an impact on Ka. The olaparib geometric mean area under the curve (AUC) and maximal concentration (Cmax) following a single 300 mg tablet were 42.1 μg h/mL and 5.8 μg/mL, respectively, and the steady-state geometric mean AUC and Cmax following a 300 mg tablet twice daily were 49.0 μg h/mL and 7.7 μg/mL, respectively. The relative exposure (AUC) of the 300 mg tablet formulation is 13% higher than the 400 mg capsule formulation. CONCLUSION: This analysis bridged the olaparib capsule and tablet formulation PK and provided key assessment to support the approval of the olaparib tablet formulation in patients with ovarian cancer, regardless of their BRCA mutation status.
Authors: Stan B Kaye; Jan Lubinski; Ursula Matulonis; Joo Ern Ang; Charlie Gourley; Beth Y Karlan; Amit Amnon; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Lee-May Chen; Michael Friedlander; Tamar Safra; Ignace Vergote; Mark Wickens; Elizabeth S Lowe; James Carmichael; Bella Kaufman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M William Audeh; James Carmichael; Richard T Penson; Michael Friedlander; Bethan Powell; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Clare Scott; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Ana Oaknin; Niklas Loman; Karen Lu; Rita K Schmutzler; Ursula Matulonis; Mark Wickens; Andrew Tutt Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew Tutt; Mark Robson; Judy E Garber; Susan M Domchek; M William Audeh; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Michael Friedlander; Banu Arun; Niklas Loman; Rita K Schmutzler; Andrew Wardley; Gillian Mitchell; Helena Earl; Mark Wickens; James Carmichael Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jonathan Ledermann; Philipp Harter; Charlie Gourley; Michael Friedlander; Ignace Vergote; Gordon Rustin; Clare Scott; Werner Meier; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Tamar Safra; Daniela Matei; Euan Macpherson; Claire Watkins; James Carmichael; Ursula Matulonis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter C Fong; David S Boss; Timothy A Yap; Andrew Tutt; Peijun Wu; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Peter Mortimer; Helen Swaisland; Alan Lau; Mark J O'Connor; Alan Ashworth; James Carmichael; Stan B Kaye; Jan H M Schellens; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian Rolfo; Judith de Vos-Geelen; Nicolas Isambert; L Rhoda Molife; Jan H M Schellens; Jacques De Grève; Luc Dirix; Peter Grundtvig-Sørensen; Guy Jerusalem; Karin Leunen; Morten Mau-Sørensen; Ruth Plummer; Maria Learoyd; Wendy Bannister; Anitra Fielding; Alain Ravaud Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Rebecca L Lloyd; Paul W G Wijnhoven; Antonio Ramos-Montoya; Zena Wilson; Giuditta Illuzzi; Katarzyna Falenta; Gemma N Jones; Neil James; Christophe D Chabbert; Jonathan Stott; Emma Dean; Alan Lau; Lucy A Young Journal: Oncogene Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Anna Mueller-Schoell; Stefanie L Groenland; Oliver Scherf-Clavel; Madelé van Dyk; Wilhelm Huisinga; Robin Michelet; Ulrich Jaehde; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema; Charlotte Kloft Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 2.953