Literature DB >> 26508638

CRISPR/Cas9 somatic multiplex-mutagenesis for high-throughput functional cancer genomics in mice.

Julia Weber1, Rupert Öllinger2, Mathias Friedrich3, Ursula Ehmer2, Maxim Barenboim1, Katja Steiger4, Irina Heid5, Sebastian Mueller2, Roman Maresch1, Thomas Engleitner1, Nina Gross1, Ulf Geumann1, Beiyuan Fu3, Angela Segler4, Detian Yuan6, Sebastian Lange2, Alexander Strong3, Jorge de la Rosa3, Irene Esposito7, Pentao Liu3, Juan Cadiñanos8, George S Vassiliou3, Roland M Schmid1, Günter Schneider2, Kristian Unger9, Fengtang Yang3, Rickmer Braren5, Mathias Heikenwälder10, Ignacio Varela11, Dieter Saur1, Allan Bradley3, Roland Rad12.   

Abstract

Here, we show CRISPR/Cas9-based targeted somatic multiplex-mutagenesis and its application for high-throughput analysis of gene function in mice. Using hepatic single guide RNA (sgRNA) delivery, we targeted large gene sets to induce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We observed Darwinian selection of target genes, which suppress tumorigenesis in the respective cellular/tissue context, such as Pten or Cdkn2a, and conversely found low frequency of Brca1/2 alterations, explaining mutational spectra in human ICC/HCC. Our studies show that multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 can be used for recessive genetic screening or high-throughput cancer gene validation in mice. The analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-induced tumors provided support for a major role of chromatin modifiers in hepatobiliary tumorigenesis, including that of ARID family proteins, which have recently been reported to be mutated in ICC/HCC. We have also comprehensively characterized the frequency and size of chromosomal alterations induced by combinatorial sgRNA delivery and describe related limitations of CRISPR/Cas9 multiplexing, as well as opportunities for chromosome engineering in the context of hepatobiliary tumorigenesis. Our study describes novel approaches to model and study cancer in a high-throughput multiplexed format that will facilitate the functional annotation of cancer genomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosome engineering; hepatocellular carcinoma; in vivo CRISPR/Cas9; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; somatic multiplex-mutagenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26508638      PMCID: PMC4653208          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1512392112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

Review 1.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Blake Wiedenheft; Samuel H Sternberg; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA.

Authors:  Josiane E Garneau; Marie-Ève Dupuis; Manuela Villion; Dennis A Romero; Rodolphe Barrangou; Patrick Boyaval; Christophe Fremaux; Philippe Horvath; Alfonso H Magadán; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Kras(G12D) and p53 mutation cause primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael R O'Dell; Jing Li Huang; Christa L Whitney-Miller; Vikram Deshpande; Paul Rothberg; Valerie Grose; Randall M Rossi; Andrew X Zhu; Hartmut Land; Nabeel Bardeesy; Aram F Hezel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Jenny J Wei; David M Sabatini; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: progress and promise.

Authors:  Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  PiggyBac transposon mutagenesis: a tool for cancer gene discovery in mice.

Authors:  Roland Rad; Lena Rad; Wei Wang; Juan Cadinanos; George Vassiliou; Stephen Rice; Lia S Campos; Kosuke Yusa; Ruby Banerjee; Meng Amy Li; Jorge de la Rosa; Alexander Strong; Dong Lu; Peter Ellis; Nathalie Conte; Fang Tang Yang; Pentao Liu; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Using genetically engineered mouse models to validate candidate cancer genes and test new therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Martine H van Miltenburg; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal copy-number changes identifies key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Cécile Guichard; Giuliana Amaddeo; Sandrine Imbeaud; Yannick Ladeiro; Laura Pelletier; Ichrafe Ben Maad; Julien Calderaro; Paulette Bioulac-Sage; Mélanie Letexier; Françoise Degos; Bruno Clément; Charles Balabaud; Eric Chevet; Alexis Laurent; Gabrielle Couchy; Eric Letouzé; Fabien Calvo; Jessica Zucman-Rossi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A cluster of cooperating tumor-suppressor gene candidates in chromosomal deletions.

Authors:  Wen Xue; Thomas Kitzing; Stephanie Roessler; Johannes Zuber; Alexander Krasnitz; Nikolaus Schultz; Kate Revill; Susann Weissmueller; Amy R Rappaport; Janelle Simon; Jack Zhang; Weijun Luo; James Hicks; Lars Zender; Xin Wei Wang; Scott Powers; Michael Wigler; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation.

Authors:  Maria E Figueroa; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Chao Lu; Patrick S Ward; Jay Patel; Alan Shih; Yushan Li; Neha Bhagwat; Aparna Vasanthakumar; Hugo F Fernandez; Martin S Tallman; Zhuoxin Sun; Kristy Wolniak; Justine K Peeters; Wei Liu; Sung E Choe; Valeria R Fantin; Elisabeth Paietta; Bob Löwenberg; Jonathan D Licht; Lucy A Godley; Ruud Delwel; Peter J M Valk; Craig B Thompson; Ross L Levine; Ari Melnick
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 38.585

View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  The present and future of genome editing in cancer research.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Li; Raymond Wu; Andrea Ventura
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  In vivo functional screening for systems-level integrative cancer genomics.

Authors:  Julia Weber; Christian J Braun; Dieter Saur; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  piggyBac mediates efficient in vivo CRISPR library screening for tumorigenesis in mice.

Authors:  Chunlong Xu; Xiaolan Qi; Xuguang Du; Huiying Zou; Fei Gao; Tao Feng; Hengxing Lu; Shenglan Li; Xiaomeng An; Lijun Zhang; Yuanyuan Wu; Ying Liu; Ning Li; Mario R Capecchi; Sen Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond.

Authors:  Rodolphe Barrangou; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  The past and presence of gene targeting: from chemicals and DNA via proteins to RNA.

Authors:  T M Geel; M H J Ruiters; R H Cool; L Halby; D C Voshart; L Andrade Ruiz; K E Niezen-Koning; P B Arimondo; M G Rots
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  CRISPR/Cas9: at the cutting edge of hepatology.

Authors:  Francis P Pankowicz; Kelsey E Jarrett; William R Lagor; Karl-Dimiter Bissig
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Constitutive and Inducible Systems for Genetic In Vivo Modification of Mouse Hepatocytes Using Hydrodynamic Tail Vein Injection.

Authors:  Eric K Hubner; Christian Lechler; Thomas N Rösner; Birgit Kohnke-Ertel; Roland M Schmid; Ursula Ehmer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Combinatorial genetics in liver repopulation and carcinogenesis with a in vivo CRISPR activation platform.

Authors:  Kirk J Wangensteen; Yue J Wang; Zhixun Dou; Amber W Wang; Elham Mosleh-Shirazi; Max A Horlbeck; Luke A Gilbert; Jonathan S Weissman; Shelley L Berger; Klaus H Kaestner
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Cancer CRISPR Screens In Vivo.

Authors:  Ryan D Chow; Sidi Chen
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2018-03-30

10.  Somatic Liver Knockout (SLiK): A Quick and Efficient Way to Generate Liver-Specific Knockout Mice Using Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing.

Authors:  Collin G Johnson; Tong Chen; Nika Furey; Madeline G Hemmingsen; Karl-Dimiter Bissig
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.