Literature DB >> 28062688

piggyBac mediates efficient in vivo CRISPR library screening for tumorigenesis in mice.

Chunlong Xu1, Xiaolan Qi1, Xuguang Du1, Huiying Zou1, Fei Gao1, Tao Feng1, Hengxing Lu1, Shenglan Li2,3, Xiaomeng An1, Lijun Zhang1, Yuanyuan Wu4, Ying Liu2,3,5, Ning Li1, Mario R Capecchi6, Sen Wu7.   

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is becoming an increasingly important tool to functionally annotate genomes. However, because genome-wide CRISPR libraries are mostly constructed in lentiviral vectors, in vivo applications are severely limited as a result of difficulties in delivery. Here, we examined the piggyBac (PB) transposon as an alternative vehicle to deliver a guide RNA (gRNA) library for in vivo screening. Although tumor induction has previously been achieved in mice by targeting cancer genes with the CRISPR/Cas9 system, in vivo genome-scale screening has not been reported. With our PB-CRISPR libraries, we conducted an in vivo genome-wide screen in mice and identified genes mediating liver tumorigenesis, including known and unknown tumor suppressor genes (TSGs). Our results demonstrate that PB can be a simple and nonviral choice for efficient in vivo delivery of CRISPR libraries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; liver cancer; piggyBac transposon; screening; tumorigenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28062688      PMCID: PMC5278437          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615735114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel C Koboldt; Qunyuan Zhang; David E Larson; Dong Shen; Michael D McLellan; Ling Lin; Christopher A Miller; Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA.

Authors:  F Liu; Y Song; D Liu
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Mammalian mutagenesis using a highly mobile somatic Sleeping Beauty transposon system.

Authors:  Adam J Dupuy; Keiko Akagi; David A Largaespada; Neal G Copeland; Nancy A Jenkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Direct in vivo RNAi screen unveils myosin IIa as a tumor suppressor of squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Daniel Schramek; Ataman Sendoel; Jeremy P Segal; Slobodan Beronja; Evan Heller; Daniel Oristian; Boris Reva; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Efficient germ-line transmission obtained with transgene-free induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Sen Wu; Yuanyuan Wu; Xi Zhang; Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transposon mutagenesis identifies genes driving hepatocellular carcinoma in a chronic hepatitis B mouse model.

Authors:  Nancy A Jenkins; Neal G Copeland; Emilie A Bard-Chapeau; Anh-Tuan Nguyen; Alistair G Rust; Ahmed Sayadi; Philip Lee; Belinda Q Chua; Lee-Sun New; Johann de Jong; Jerrold M Ward; Christopher Ky Chin; Valerie Chew; Han Chong Toh; Jean-Pierre Abastado; Touati Benoukraf; Richie Soong; Frederic A Bard; Adam J Dupuy; Randy L Johnson; George K Radda; Eric Cy Chan; Lodewyk Fa Wessels; David J Adams
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Simple and rapid in vivo generation of chromosomal rearrangements using CRISPR/Cas9 technology.

Authors:  Rafael B Blasco; Elif Karaca; Chiara Ambrogio; Taek-Chin Cheong; Emre Karayol; Valerio G Minero; Claudia Voena; Roberto Chiarle
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Somatic CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tumour suppressor disruption enables versatile brain tumour modelling.

Authors:  Marc Zuckermann; Volker Hovestadt; Christiane B Knobbe-Thomsen; Marc Zapatka; Paul A Northcott; Kathrin Schramm; Jelena Belic; David T W Jones; Barbara Tschida; Branden Moriarity; David Largaespada; Martine F Roussel; Andrey Korshunov; Guido Reifenberger; Stefan M Pfister; Peter Lichter; Daisuke Kawauchi; Jan Gronych
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Knut Woltjen; Iacovos P Michael; Paria Mohseni; Ridham Desai; Maria Mileikovsky; Riikka Hämäläinen; Rebecca Cowling; Wei Wang; Pentao Liu; Marina Gertsenstein; Keisuke Kaji; Hoon-Ki Sung; Andras Nagy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  In vivo functional screening for systems-level integrative cancer genomics.

Authors:  Julia Weber; Christian J Braun; Dieter Saur; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Tutorial: design and execution of CRISPR in vivo screens.

Authors:  Christian J Braun; Andrés Carbonell Adames; Dieter Saur; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 3.  CRISPR somatic genome engineering and cancer modeling in the mouse pancreas and liver.

Authors:  Thorsten Kaltenbacher; Jessica Löprich; Roman Maresch; Julia Weber; Sebastian Müller; Rupert Oellinger; Nina Groß; Joscha Griger; Niklas de Andrade Krätzig; Petros Avramopoulos; Deepak Ramanujam; Sabine Brummer; Sebastian A Widholz; Stefanie Bärthel; Chiara Falcomatà; Anja Pfaus; Ahmed Alnatsha; Julia Mayerle; Marc Schmidt-Supprian; Maximilian Reichert; Günter Schneider; Ursula Ehmer; Christian J Braun; Dieter Saur; Stefan Engelhardt; Roland Rad
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 4.  High-Throughput Approaches to Pinpoint Function within the Noncoding Genome.

Authors:  Antonino Montalbano; Matthew C Canver; Neville E Sanjana
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Exploring liver cancer biology through functional genetic screens.

Authors:  Cun Wang; Ying Cao; Chen Yang; René Bernards; Wenxin Qin
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  SEMMs: Somatically Engineered Mouse Models. A New Tool for In Vivo Disease Modeling for Basic and Translational Research.

Authors:  Anthony Lima; Danilo Maddalo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  ZEB1-repressed microRNAs inhibit autocrine signaling that promotes vascular mimicry of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  E M Langer; N D Kendsersky; C J Daniel; G M Kuziel; C Pelz; K M Murphy; M R Capecchi; R C Sears
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  One-Step piggyBac Transposon-Based CRISPR/Cas9 Activation of Multiple Genes.

Authors:  Shenglan Li; Anqi Zhang; Haipeng Xue; Dali Li; Ying Liu
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 8.886

Review 9.  In vivo genome editing thrives with diversified CRISPR technologies.

Authors:  Xun Ma; Avery Sum-Yu Wong; Hei-Yin Tam; Samuel Yung-Kin Tsui; Dittman Lai-Shun Chung; Bo Feng
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2018-03-18

Review 10.  Review of applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology in cancer research.

Authors:  Ziyi Zhao; Chenxi Li; Fei Tong; Jingkuang Deng; Guofu Huang; Yi Sang
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.