Literature DB >> 27432158

The present and future of genome editing in cancer research.

Xiaoyi Li1,2, Raymond Wu1,2, Andrea Ventura3.   

Abstract

The widespread use of high-throughput genome sequencing methods is profoundly changing the way we understand, classify, and treat human cancers. To make sense of the deluge of sequencing data generated in the clinic, more effective and rapid assessments of the functional relevance of newly discovered cancer-associated mutations are urgently needed. In this review, we discuss how genome editing technologies are responding to this major challenge. Largely focusing on CRISPR-based methods, we will highlight their potential to accelerate discovery, discuss their current limitations, and speculate about future applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27432158      PMCID: PMC5512423          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-016-1713-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  94 in total

1.  Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Chie-Yu Lin; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Silvana Konermann; Alexandro E Trevino; David A Scott; Azusa Inoue; Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Ophir Shalem; Neville E Sanjana; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Modeling Disease In Vivo With CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.951

4.  Transforming genes of human bladder and lung carcinoma cell lines are homologous to the ras genes of Harvey and Kirsten sarcoma viruses.

Authors:  C J Der; T G Krontiris; G M Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Christopher E Nelson; Chady H Hakim; David G Ousterout; Pratiksha I Thakore; Eirik A Moreb; Ruth M Castellanos Rivera; Sarina Madhavan; Xiufang Pan; F Ann Ran; Winston X Yan; Aravind Asokan; Feng Zhang; Dongsheng Duan; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  lincRNAs: genomics, evolution, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Igor Ulitsky; David P Bartel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Recurrent somatic mutations in regulatory regions of human cancer genomes.

Authors:  Collin Melton; Jason A Reuter; Damek V Spacek; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genome-wide analysis of noncoding regulatory mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Nils Weinhold; Anders Jacobsen; Nikolaus Schultz; Chris Sander; William Lee
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Repurposing the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted DNA methylation.

Authors:  Aleksandar Vojta; Paula Dobrinić; Vanja Tadić; Luka Bočkor; Petra Korać; Boris Julg; Marija Klasić; Vlatka Zoldoš
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Baohui Chen; Luke A Gilbert; Beth A Cimini; Joerg Schnitzbauer; Wei Zhang; Gene-Wei Li; Jason Park; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi; Bo Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  7 in total

1.  Biomedical applications of gene editing.

Authors:  Pablo Perez-Pinera; Zheng-Yi Chen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Modulating signaling networks by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transposable element insertion.

Authors:  Luis María Vaschetto
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 3.  The Promise and Challenge of In Vivo Delivery for Genome Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ross C Wilson; Luke A Gilbert
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Fluorescent RNA cytosine analogue - an internal probe for detailed structure and dynamics investigations.

Authors:  Anders Foller Füchtbauer; Søren Preus; Karl Börjesson; Scott A McPhee; David M J Lilley; L Marcus Wilhelmsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Mutant allele quantification reveals a genetic basis for TP53 mutation-driven castration resistance in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Kefeng Lei; Ran Sun; Lee H Chen; Bill H Diplas; Casey J Moure; Wenzhe Wang; Landon J Hansen; Yulei Tao; Xufeng Chen; Chin-Pu Jason Chen; Paula K Greer; Fangping Zhao; Hai Yan; Darell D Bigner; Jiaoti Huang; Yiping He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Safety and Efficacy of AAV Retrograde Pancreatic Ductal Gene Delivery in Normal and Pancreatic Cancer Mice.

Authors:  Kayla A Quirin; Jason J Kwon; Arafat Alioufi; Tricia Factora; Constance J Temm; Max Jacobsen; George E Sandusky; Kim Shontz; Louis G Chicoine; K Reed Clark; Joshua T Mendell; Murray Korc; Janaiah Kota
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 6.698

7.  Genomic Deletion at 10q23 in Prostate Cancer: More Than PTEN Loss?

Authors:  Raghavendra Tejo Karthik Poluri; Étienne Audet-Walsh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.