Alan Chu1, Douglas C Noll2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. alanchu@umich.edu. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging is a useful way to accelerate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). As acceleration becomes more aggressive, an increasingly larger number of receive coils are required to separate the slices, which significantly increases the computational burden. We propose a coil compression method that works with concentric ring non-Cartesian SMS imaging and should work with Cartesian SMS as well. We evaluate the method on fMRI scans of several subjects and compare it to standard coil compression methods. METHODS: The proposed method uses a slice-separation k-space kernel to simultaneously compress coil data into a set of virtual coils. Five subjects were scanned using both non-SMS fMRI and SMS fMRI with three simultaneous slices. The SMS fMRI scans were processed using the proposed method, along with other conventional methods. Code is available at https://github.com/alcu/sms. RESULTS: The proposed method maintained functional activation with a fewer number of virtual coils than standard SMS coil compression methods. Compression of non-SMS fMRI maintained activation with a slightly lower number of virtual coils than the proposed method, but does not have the acceleration advantages of SMS fMRI. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is a practical way to compress and reconstruct concentric ring SMS data and improves the preservation of functional activation over standard coil compression methods in fMRI. Magn Reson Med 76:1196-1209, 2016.
PURPOSE: Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging is a useful way to accelerate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). As acceleration becomes more aggressive, an increasingly larger number of receive coils are required to separate the slices, which significantly increases the computational burden. We propose a coil compression method that works with concentric ring non-Cartesian SMS imaging and should work with Cartesian SMS as well. We evaluate the method on fMRI scans of several subjects and compare it to standard coil compression methods. METHODS: The proposed method uses a slice-separation k-space kernel to simultaneously compress coil data into a set of virtual coils. Five subjects were scanned using both non-SMS fMRI and SMS fMRI with three simultaneous slices. The SMS fMRI scans were processed using the proposed method, along with other conventional methods. Code is available at https://github.com/alcu/sms. RESULTS: The proposed method maintained functional activation with a fewer number of virtual coils than standard SMS coil compression methods. Compression of non-SMS fMRI maintained activation with a slightly lower number of virtual coils than the proposed method, but does not have the acceleration advantages of SMS fMRI. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is a practical way to compress and reconstruct concentric ring SMS data and improves the preservation of functional activation over standard coil compression methods in fMRI. Magn Reson Med 76:1196-1209, 2016.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jonathan R Polimeni; Himanshu Bhat; Thomas Witzel; Thomas Benner; Thorsten Feiweier; Souheil J Inati; Ville Renvall; Keith Heberlein; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Philip M Robson; Aaron K Grant; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles A McKenzie Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Philip J Beatty; Shaorong Chang; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Anja C S Brau; Scott B Reeder; Jean H Brittain Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Changyu Sun; Yang Yang; Xiaoying Cai; Michael Salerno; Craig H Meyer; Daniel Weller; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Philipp Moser; Wolfgang Bogner; Lukas Hingerl; Eva Heckova; Gilbert Hangel; Stanislav Motyka; Siegfried Trattnig; Bernhard Strasser Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 4.668