Literature DB >> 26507443

Historical perspective on the DNA damage response.

Philip C Hanawalt1.   

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) has been broadly defined as a complex network of cellular pathways that cooperate to sense and repair lesions in DNA. Multiple types of DNA damage, some natural DNA sequences, nucleotide pool deficiencies and collisions with transcription complexes can cause replication arrest to elicit the DDR. However, in practice, the term DDR as applied to eukaryotic/mammalian cells often refers more specifically to pathways involving the activation of the ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM-Rad3-related) kinases in response to double-strand breaks or arrested replication forks, respectively. Nevertheless, there are distinct responses to particular types of DNA damage that do not involve ATM or ATR. In addition, some of the aberrations that cause replication arrest and elicit the DDR cannot be categorized as direct DNA damage. These include nucleotide pool deficiencies, nucleotide sequences that can adopt non-canonical DNA structures, and collisions between replication forks and transcription complexes. The response to these aberrations can be called the genomic stress response (GSR), a term that is meant to encompass the sensing of all types of DNA aberrations together with the mechanisms involved in coping with them. In addition to fully functional cells, the consequences of processing genomic aberrations may include mutagenesis, genomic rearrangements and lethality.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM; ATR; DNA damage response; DNA repair; Genomic stress response; SOS response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26507443      PMCID: PMC4688148          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  76 in total

Review 1.  The ATR-independent DNA replication checkpoint.

Authors:  Eric J Brown
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Who's on first in the cellular response to DNA damage?

Authors:  Susan D Cline; Philip C Hanawalt
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THYMINE DIMERS FROM DNA: AN ERROR-CORRECTING MECHANISM.

Authors:  R B SETLOW; W L CARRIER
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  DNA damage, aging, and cancer.

Authors:  Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The complex choreography of transcription-coupled repair.

Authors:  Graciela Spivak; Ann K Ganesan
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-19

6.  Evidence for repair replication of HeLa cell DNA damaged by ultraviolet light.

Authors:  J R Cleaver; R B Painter
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1968-07-23

Review 7.  Ultraviolet mutagenesis and inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E M Witkin
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1976-12

Review 8.  The DNA damage response: the omics era and its impact.

Authors:  Kasper W J Derks; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Joris Pothof
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-30

9.  THE BACTERICIDAL EFFECT OF ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION ON ESCHERICHIA COLI IN LIQUID SUSPENSIONS.

Authors:  A Hollaender; W D Claus
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1936-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Cockayne syndrome: varied requirement of transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair for the removal of three structurally different adducts from transcribed DNA.

Authors:  Nataliya Kitsera; Karola Gasteiger; Bork Lühnsdorf; Julia Allgayer; Bernd Epe; Thomas Carell; Andriy Khobta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  p53 and RAD9, the DNA Damage Response, and Regulation of Transcription Networks.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Sunil K Panigrahi; Kevin M Hopkins; Li Wang; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Molecular biology: The long and short of a DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Antonio Conconi; Brendan Bell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Recent advances in the study of immunodeficiency and DNA damage response.

Authors:  Tomohiro Morio
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  IDH1-R132H acts as a tumor suppressor in glioma via epigenetic up-regulation of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Felipe J Núñez; Flor M Mendez; Padma Kadiyala; Mahmoud S Alghamri; Masha G Savelieff; Maria B Garcia-Fabiani; Santiago Haase; Carl Koschmann; Anda-Alexandra Calinescu; Neha Kamran; Meghna Saxena; Rohin Patel; Stephen Carney; Marissa Z Guo; Marta Edwards; Mats Ljungman; Tingting Qin; Maureen A Sartor; Rebecca Tagett; Sriram Venneti; Jacqueline Brosnan-Cashman; Alan Meeker; Vera Gorbunova; Lili Zhao; Daniel M Kremer; Li Zhang; Costas A Lyssiotis; Lindsey Jones; Cameron J Herting; James L Ross; Dolores Hambardzumyan; Shawn Hervey-Jumper; Maria E Figueroa; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  R-loop generation during transcription: Formation, processing and cellular outcomes.

Authors:  Boris P Belotserkovskii; Silvia Tornaletti; Alicia D D'Souza; Philip C Hanawalt
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-25

6.  The circadian activity rhythm is reset by nanowatt pulses of ultraviolet light.

Authors:  David C Negelspach; Sevag Kaladchibachi; Fabian Fernandez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  DNA Replication Stress Phosphoproteome Profiles Reveal Novel Functional Phosphorylation Sites on Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Jacob J Kennedy; Chenwei Lin; Corey W Jones-Weinert; Ping Yan; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  The Cartography of UV-induced DNA Damage Formation and DNA Repair.

Authors:  Jinchuan Hu; Sheera Adar
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  TET1 regulates DNA repair in human glial cells.

Authors:  Katherine J Kuhns; Hernando Lopez-Bertoni; Jonathan B Coulter; Joseph P Bressler
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 10.  Nucleosomes Regulate Base Excision Repair in Chromatin.

Authors:  Rithy Meas; John J Wyrick; Michael J Smerdon
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.