Literature DB >> 24794401

The DNA damage response: the omics era and its impact.

Kasper W J Derks1, Jan H J Hoeijmakers1, Joris Pothof2.   

Abstract

The emergence of high density technologies monitoring the genome, transcriptome and proteome in relation to genotoxic stress have tremendously enhanced our knowledge on global responses and dynamics in the DNA damage response, including its relation with cancer and aging. Moreover, '-omics' technologies identified many novel factors, their post-translational modifications, pathways and global responses in the cellular response to DNA damage. Based on omics, it is currently estimated that thousands of gene(product)s participate in the DNA damage response, recognizing complex networks that determine cell fate after damage to the most precious cellular molecule, DNA. The development of next generation sequencing technology and associated specialized protocols can quantitatively monitor RNA and DNA at unprecedented single nucleotide resolution. In this review we will discuss the contribution of omics technologies and in particular next generation sequencing to our understanding of the DNA damage response and the future prospective of next generation sequencing, its single cell application and omics dataset integration in unraveling intricate DNA damage signaling networks.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; Genomics; Next generation sequencing; Proteomics; Transcriptomics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794401      PMCID: PMC4088957          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  87 in total

1.  Long noncoding RNAs in cell and developmental biology.

Authors:  John S Mattick
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 7.727

2.  Comparative microRNA profiling of prostate carcinomas with increasing tumor stage by deep sequencing.

Authors:  Martin Hart; Elke Nolte; Sven Wach; Jaroslaw Szczyrba; Helge Taubert; Tilman T Rau; Arndt Hartmann; Friedrich A Grässer; Bernd Wullich
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 3.  lincRNAs: genomics, evolution, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Igor Ulitsky; David P Bartel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels.

Authors:  Huili Guo; Nicholas T Ingolia; Jonathan S Weissman; David P Bartel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Identification of miRNA modulators to PARP inhibitor response.

Authors:  Sari Neijenhuis; Ilirjana Bajrami; Rowan Miller; Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-06

6.  Genome-wide profiling reveals stimulus-specific functions of p53 during differentiation and DNA damage of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Kadir C Akdemir; Abhinav K Jain; Kendra Allton; Bruce Aronow; Xueping Xu; Austin J Cooney; Wei Li; Michelle Craig Barton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Pint lincRNA connects the p53 pathway with epigenetic silencing by the Polycomb repressive complex 2.

Authors:  Oskar Marín-Béjar; Francesco P Marchese; Alejandro Athie; Yolanda Sánchez; Jovanna González; Victor Segura; Lulu Huang; Isabel Moreno; Alfons Navarro; Mariano Monzó; Jesús García-Foncillas; John L Rinn; Shuling Guo; Maite Huarte
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Persistent transcription-blocking DNA lesions trigger somatic growth attenuation associated with longevity.

Authors:  George A Garinis; Lieneke M Uittenboogaard; Heike Stachelscheid; Maria Fousteri; Wilfred van Ijcken; Timo M Breit; Harry van Steeg; Leon H F Mullenders; Gijsbertus T J van der Horst; Jens C Brüning; Carien M Niessen; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Björn Schumacher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  The genetic signatures of noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  John S Mattick
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Extensive transcriptional heterogeneity revealed by isoform profiling.

Authors:  Vicent Pelechano; Wu Wei; Lars M Steinmetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  p53 and RAD9, the DNA Damage Response, and Regulation of Transcription Networks.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Sunil K Panigrahi; Kevin M Hopkins; Li Wang; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Genetics of allergic diseases.

Authors:  Romina A Ortiz; Kathleen C Barnes
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Comparative proteomics analysis of global cellular stress responses to hydroxyurea-induced DNA damage in HeLa cells.

Authors:  Chao You; Yanhua Yang; Lei Zhang; Huiqing Chen; Yan Chen; Keping Chen; Yajing Zhou
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 4.  Comparison of toxicogenomics and traditional approaches to inform mode of action and points of departure in human health risk assessment of benzo[a]pyrene in drinking water.

Authors:  Ivy Moffat; Nikolai Chepelev; Sarah Labib; Julie Bourdon-Lacombe; Byron Kuo; Julie K Buick; France Lemieux; Andrew Williams; Sabina Halappanavar; Amal Malik; Mirjam Luijten; Jiri Aubrecht; Daniel R Hyduke; Albert J Fornace; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 5.  DNA mismatch repair and the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Zhongdao Li; Alexander H Pearlman; Peggy Hsieh
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-12-02

6.  Chk1 phosphorylated at serine345 is a predictor of early local recurrence and radio-resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Nouf Alsubhi; Fiona Middleton; Tarek M A Abdel-Fatah; Peter Stephens; Rachel Doherty; Arvind Arora; Paul M Moseley; Stephen Y T Chan; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis; Stewart G Martin; Nicola J Curtin; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 7.  Historical perspective on the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Philip C Hanawalt
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 8.  Mutations, protein homeostasis, and epigenetic control of genome integrity.

Authors:  Jinglin Lucy Xie; Daniel F Jarosz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

9.  Cas9 deactivation with photocleavable guide RNAs.

Authors:  Roger S Zou; Yang Liu; Bin Wu; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Fluorescence Sheds Light on DNA Damage, DNA Repair, and Mutations.

Authors:  Norah A Owiti; Zachary D Nagel; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.