Literature DB >> 28140789

p53 and RAD9, the DNA Damage Response, and Regulation of Transcription Networks.

Howard B Lieberman1,2, Sunil K Panigrahi1, Kevin M Hopkins1, Li Wang1, Constantinos G Broustas1.   

Abstract

The way cells respond to DNA damage is important since inefficient repair or misrepair of lesions can have deleterious consequences, including mutation, genomic instability, neurodegenerative disorders, premature aging, cancer or death. Whether damage occurs spontaneously as a byproduct of normal metabolic processes, or after exposure to exogenous agents, cells muster a coordinated, complex DNA damage response (DDR) to mitigate potential harmful effects. A variety of activities are involved to promote cell survival, and include DNA repair, DNA damage tolerance, as well as transient cell cycle arrest to provide time for repair before entry into critical cell cycle phases, an event that could be lethal if traversal occurs while damage is present. When such damage is prolonged or not repairable, senescence, apoptosis or autophagy is induced. One major level of DDR regulation occurs via the orchestrated transcriptional control of select sets of genes encoding proteins that mediate the response. p53 is a transcription factor that transactivates specific DDR downstream genes through binding DNA consensus sequences usually in or near target gene promoter regions. The profile of p53-regulated genes activated at any given time varies, and is dependent upon type of DNA damage or stress experienced, exact composition of the consensus DNA binding sequence, presence of other DNA binding proteins, as well as cell context. RAD9 is another protein critical for the response of cells to DNA damage, and can also selectively regulate gene transcription. The limited studies addressing the role of RAD9 in transcription regulation indicate that the protein transactivates at least one of its target genes, p21/waf1/cip1, by binding to DNA sequences demonstrated to be a p53 response element. NEIL1 is also regulated by RAD9 through a similar DNA sequence, though not yet directly verified as a bonafide p53 response element. These findings suggest a novel pathway whereby p53 and RAD9 control the DDR through a shared mechanism involving an overlapping network of downstream target genes. Details and unresolved questions about how these proteins coordinate or compete to execute the DDR through transcriptional reprogramming, as well as biological implications, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28140789      PMCID: PMC6061921          DOI: 10.1667/RR003CC.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  131 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage response pathways: at the crossroad of protein modifications.

Authors:  Michael S Y Huen; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

2.  Regulation of MDMX expression by mitogenic signaling.

Authors:  Daniele M Gilkes; Yu Pan; Domenico Coppola; Timothy Yeatman; Gary W Reuther; Jiandong Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Structure of the human Mdmx protein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Popowicz; Anna Czarna; Tad A Holak
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Nucleotide excision repair in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Orlando D Schärer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  The DNA damage response: the omics era and its impact.

Authors:  Kasper W J Derks; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Joris Pothof
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-30

6.  p53 and DNA damage-inducible expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene.

Authors:  Shanthi Adimoolam; James M Ford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4) photoproducts block polymerization by DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  G L Chan; P W Doetsch; W A Haseltine
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1985-10-08       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes.

Authors:  Lee Zou; Dou Liu; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress.

Authors:  Shan Yan; Melanie Sorrell; Zachary Berman
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 10.  The p53 Pathway: Origins, Inactivation in Cancer, and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Andreas C Joerger; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 23.643

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Mehdi Bouhaddou; Danish Memon; Bjoern Meyer; Kris M White; Veronica V Rezelj; Miguel Correa Marrero; Benjamin J Polacco; James E Melnyk; Svenja Ulferts; Robyn M Kaake; Jyoti Batra; Alicia L Richards; Erica Stevenson; David E Gordon; Ajda Rojc; Kirsten Obernier; Jacqueline M Fabius; Margaret Soucheray; Lisa Miorin; Elena Moreno; Cassandra Koh; Quang Dinh Tran; Alexandra Hardy; Rémy Robinot; Thomas Vallet; Benjamin E Nilsson-Payant; Claudia Hernandez-Armenta; Alistair Dunham; Sebastian Weigang; Julian Knerr; Maya Modak; Diego Quintero; Yuan Zhou; Aurelien Dugourd; Alberto Valdeolivas; Trupti Patil; Qiongyu Li; Ruth Hüttenhain; Merve Cakir; Monita Muralidharan; Minkyu Kim; Gwendolyn Jang; Beril Tutuncuoglu; Joseph Hiatt; Jeffrey Z Guo; Jiewei Xu; Sophia Bouhaddou; Christopher J P Mathy; Anna Gaulton; Emma J Manners; Eloy Félix; Ying Shi; Marisa Goff; Jean K Lim; Timothy McBride; Michael C O'Neal; Yiming Cai; Jason C J Chang; David J Broadhurst; Saker Klippsten; Emmie De Wit; Andrew R Leach; Tanja Kortemme; Brian Shoichet; Melanie Ott; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Benjamin R tenOever; R Dyche Mullins; Elizabeth R Fischer; Georg Kochs; Robert Grosse; Adolfo García-Sastre; Marco Vignuzzi; Jeffery R Johnson; Kevan M Shokat; Danielle L Swaney; Pedro Beltrao; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Sensitization of colorectal cancer to irinotecan therapy by PARP inhibitor rucaparib.

Authors:  Titto Augustine; Radhashree Maitra; Jinghang Zhang; Jay Nayak; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Prostate cancer: unmet clinical needs and RAD9 as a candidate biomarker for patient management.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Alex J Rai; Richard A Friedman; Kevin M Hopkins; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 1.241

4.  RAD9A promotes metastatic phenotypes through transcriptional regulation of anterior gradient 2 (AGR2).

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Kevin M Hopkins; Sunil K Panigrahi; Li Wang; Renu K Virk; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  DNMT1 and DNMT3B regulate tumorigenicity of human prostate cancer cells by controlling RAD9 expression through targeted methylation.

Authors:  Aiping Zhu; Kevin M Hopkins; Richard A Friedman; Joshua D Bernstock; Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 6.  The gut microbiota can be a potential regulator and treatment target of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Kelly F Contino; Hariom Yadav; Yusuke Shiozawa
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Low dose arsenite confers resistance to UV induced apoptosis via p53-MDM2 pathway in ketatinocytes.

Authors:  Y Zhou; W Zeng; M Qi; Y Duan; J Su; S Zhao; W Zhong; M Gao; F Li; Y He; X Hu; X Xu; X Chen; C Peng; J Zhang
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 7.485

8.  Investigation of the Possible Role of RAD9 in Post-Diapaused Embryonic Development of the Brine Shrimp Artemia sinica.

Authors:  Huifang Huang; Ce Chen; Feng Yao; Xiuling Li; Yanan Wang; Yuting Shao; Xinyao Wang; Xingzheng Zhang; Tao Jiang; Lin Hou
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  Multi-Omics Approaches and Radiation on Lipid Metabolism in Toothed Whales.

Authors:  Jayan D M Senevirathna; Shuichi Asakawa
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20

10.  FOXP1 and NDRG1 act differentially as downstream effectors of RAD9-mediated prostate cancer cell functions.

Authors:  Sunil K Panigrahi; Constantinos G Broustas; Ping Q Cuiper; Renu K Virk; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.