| Literature DB >> 26500615 |
Nagaiah Premalatha1, Nellaiappan O Gopal1, Polpass Arul Jose1, Rangasamy Anandham1, Soon-Wo Kwon2.
Abstract
Cellulase finds use in saccharification of lignocellulosic agroresidues to fermentable sugars which can be used for production of commercially important metabolites. This study reports endoglucanase (CMCase) production by Enhydrobacter sp. ACCA2. The CMCase activity of the strain ACCA2 was successively improved by optimization of range of physical and nutritional parameter in a set of non-statistical and statistical experiments. Initial non-statistical selection of carbon source, incubation time, temperature and pH resulted in 1.07 fold increase of CMCase activity. In a subsequent statistical method, response surface methodology, optimization of medium components such as carboxymethylcellulose, peptone, NaCl, MgSO4, K2HPO4, and (NH4)2SO4 yielded further increase up to 2.39 fold CMCase activity. The cellulolytic potential was evaluated in biomass saccharification with different plant materials and the results revealed that the enzyme produced by strain may have significant commercial values for industrial saccharification process. Moreover, this is the first report of cellulase production by an Enhydrobacter spp.Entities:
Keywords: carboxy methyl cellulose; cellulase; central composite design; response surface methodology; saccharification
Year: 2015 PMID: 26500615 PMCID: PMC4597110 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Factors involved according to CCD in RSM for optimization of cellulase production.
| Factors | Coded and actual values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.682 | -1 | 0 | +1 | +1.682 | |
| CMC | 2.174 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 17.825 |
| Peptone | 2.174 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 17.825 |
| NaCl | 0.130 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.069 |
| MgSO4 | 0.130 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.069 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 0.065 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.45 | 0.534 |
| K2HPO4 | 0.217 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.782 |
Central composite design matrix, observed, and predicted responses.
| Run | Media components, codes, and coded values | Cellulase activity (U/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMC (A) | Peptone (B) | NaCl (C) | MgSO4 (D) | (NH4)2SO4 (E) | K2HPO4 (F) | Observed | Predicted | |
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 2.30 | 2.29 |
| 2 | +1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | 2.70 | 2.67 |
| 3 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | 2.00 | 2.16 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 2.70 | 2.84 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | 2.00 | 2.01 |
| 6 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 2.30 | 2.34 |
| 7 | -1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 2.90 | 2.78 |
| 8 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | 2.59 | 2.75 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | 3.00 | 3.20 |
| 10 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | 2.10 | 2.09 |
| 11 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | 2.30 | 2.18 |
| 12 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | 2.50 | 2.55 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | 3.95 | 4.15 |
| 14 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | 2.30 | 2.20 |
| 15 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | 2.20 | 2.24 |
| 16 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | 2.50 | 2.58 |
| 17 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | 2.20 | 2.19 |
| 18 | +1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | 2.30 | 2.32 |
| 19 | -1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | 2.00 | 2.16 |
| 20 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | 2.30 | 5.16 |
| 21 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | 2.10 | 2.11 |
| 22 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | 2.60 | 2.79 |
| 23 | -1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | 2.50 | 2.57 |
| 24 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | -1 | 4.30 | 4.16 |
| 25 | -1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | 1.80 | 1.70 |
| 26 | +1 | -1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 2.60 | 2.78 |
| 27 | -1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 2.20 | 2.22 |
| 28 | +1 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | 2.30 | 2.35 |
| 29 | -1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 2.40 | 2.32 |
| 30 | +1 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | 2.20 | 2.11 |
| 31 | -1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | -1 | 2.40 | 2.49 |
| 32 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 3.10 | 3.17 |
| 33 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.94 | 1.72 |
| 34 | +1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.50 | 2.31 |
| 35 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.20 | 2.05 |
| 36 | 0 | +1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.80 | 2.55 |
| 37 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 2.15 |
| 38 | 0 | 0 | +1.682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.50 | 2.34 |
| 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.59 |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1.682 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.30 |
| 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 3.30 | 2.97 |
| 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1.682 | 0 | 3.20 | 3.12 |
| 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 3.50 | 3.48 |
| 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1.682 | 4.10 | 3.71 |
| 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.70 | 3.71 |
| 46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.50 | 3.71 |
| 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.70 | 3.71 |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.10 | 3.71 |
| 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.80 | 3.71 |
| 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.20 | 3.71 |
| 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.90 | 3.71 |
| 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.00 | 3.71 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of quadratic polynomial model and significance test.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 27.45 | 27 | 1.02 | 11.18 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Residual | 2.18 | 24 | 0.091 | |||
| Lack of fit | 1.25 | 17 | 0.074 | 0.56 | 0.8475 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 0.93 | 7 | 0.13 | |||
| Cor total | 29.63 | 51 |
Successive levels of experiments and achieved enhancement in cellulolytic potential of strain ACCA2.
| Stages | Constant parameter | Variable parameter | Range | Suitable/optimum | Maximum activity (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Basal medium + Incubation time + Temperature + pH | Carbon Source | CMC | 2.61 | |
| Level 2 | Basal medium + CMC + Temperature + pH | Incubation time | 1 – 5 days | 3 days | 3.59 |
| Level 3 | Basal medium + CMC + Optimum incubation time + pH | Temperature | 25 – 45°C | 30°C | 3.85 |
| Level 4 | Basal medium + CMC + Optimum incubation time + Optimum temperature | pH | 4.5 – 8.5 | 6.5 | 4.4 |
| Level 5 | Optimum incubation time + Optimum temperature + Optimum pH | CMC | 2.174 – 17.825 g/L | 15.00 g/L | 8.86 |
| Peptone | 2.174 – 17.825 g/L | 14.45 g/L | |||
| NaCl | 0.130 – 1.069 g/L | 0.44 g/L | |||
| MgSO4 | 0.130 – 1.069 g/L | 0.31 g/L | |||
| (NH4)2SO4 | 0.150 – 0.534 g/L | 0.45 g/L | |||
| K2HPO4 | 0.500 – 1.782 g/L | 1.50 g/L |