| Literature DB >> 28330303 |
Gurupatham Devadhasan Biji1, Arumugaperumal Arun2, Eswaran Muthulakshmi2, Ponnuswamy Vijayaraghavan3, Mariadhas Valan Arasu4, Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi4.
Abstract
The process parameters governing the production of fibrinolytic enzyme in solid state fermentation employing Bacillus cereus IND5 and using cuttle fish waste and cow dung substrate were optimized. The pH value of the medium, moisture content, sucrose, casein and magnesium sulfate were considered for two-level full factorial design and pH, casein and magnesium sulfate were identified as the important factors for fibrinolytic enzyme production. Central composite design was applied to investigate the interactive effect among variables (pH, casein and magnesium sulfate) and response surface plots were created to find the pinnacle of process response. The optimized levels of factors were pH 7.8, 1.1% casein and 0.1% magnesium sulfate. Enzyme production was increased 2.5-fold after statistical approach. The enzyme was purified up to a specific activity of 364.5 U/g proteins and its molecular weight was 47 kDa. It was stable at pH 8.0 and was highly active at 50 °C. The mixture of cuttle fish waste and cow dung could find great application as solid substrate for the production of fibrinolytic enzyme.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus cereus IND5; Cow dung; Cuttle fish waste; Fibrinolytic enzyme; Solid state fermentation; Thrombolytic therapy
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330303 PMCID: PMC5234527 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0553-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1Fibrinolytic enzyme activity of the bacterial isolates on fibrin plate (C-control)
Fig. 2Effect of carbon source (a) nitrogen source (b) and ion (c) on fibrinolytic enzyme production
The independent variables chosen for 25 factorial design and their coded levels
| Symbol | Variables | Units | Coded levels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | +1 | |||
| A | pH | 7 | 9 | |
| B | Moisture | (%) | 80 | 100 |
| C | Sucrose | (%) | 0.1 | 1.0 |
| D | Casein | (%) | 0.1 | 1.0 |
| E | MgSO4 | (%) | 0.01 | 0.10 |
Randomized runs of 25 factorial design and the measured response
| Run | A:pH | B:Moisture | C:Sucrose (%) | D:Casein (%) | E:MgSO4 (%) | Enzyme activity (U/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1693 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 2730 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1258 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 2019 |
| 5 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 2997 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2320 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 821 |
| 8 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1166 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 2233 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 2310 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 530 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 4251 |
| 13 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1546 |
| 14 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 180 |
| 15 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 2031 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 2544 |
| 17 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 2754 |
| 18 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1750 |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 230 |
| 20 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 3587 |
| 21 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3605 |
| 22 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 3198 |
| 23 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 910 |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 4640 |
| 25 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 5044 |
| 26 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 2521 |
| 27 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2818 |
| 28 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 3651 |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 3840 |
| 30 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3340 |
| 31 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 2251 |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1510 |
ANOVA results for 25 factorial design
| Source | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4.876+007 | 27 | 1.806E+006 | 128.47 | 0.0001 | Significant |
| A-pH | 1.759E+006 | 1 | 1.759E+006 | 125.13 | 0.0004 | |
| B-Moisture | 2.646E+005 | 1 | 2.646E+005 | 18.83 | 0.0123 | |
| C-Sucrose | 18.00 | 1 | 18.00 | 1.281E−003 | 0.9732 | |
| D-Casein | 4.646E+005 | 1 | 4.646E+005 | 33.06 | 0.0045 | |
| E-MgSO4 | 2.192E+006 | 1 | 2.192E+006 | 155.98 | 0.0002 | |
| AB | 9.788E+006 | 1 | 9.788E+006 | 696.37 | <0.0001 | |
| AC | 2.042E+005 | 1 | 2.042E+005 | 14.52 | 0.0189 | |
| AD | 1.027E+006 | 1 | 1.027E+006 | 73.05 | 0.0010 | |
| AE | 4.762E+006 | 1 | 4.762E+006 | 338.77 | <0.0001 | |
| BC | 41184.50 | 1 | 41184.50 | 2.93 | 0.1621 | |
| BD | 1.069E+006 | 1 | 1.069E+006 | 76.03 | 0.0010 | |
| BE | 2.258E+005 | 1 | 2.258E+005 | 16.06 | 0.0160 | |
| CD | 40186.13 | 1 | 40186.13 | 2.86 | 0.1661 | |
| CE | 2.384E+005 | 1 | 2.384E+005 | 16.96 | 0.0146 | |
| DE | 3.737E+005 | 1 | 3.737E+005 | 26.59 | 0.0067 | |
| ABC | 1.069E+007 | 1 | 1.069E+007 | 760.25 | <0.0001 | |
| ABE | 1.474E+005 | 1 | 1.474E+005 | 10.49 | 0.0317 | |
| ACD | 2.193E+006 | 1 | 2.193E+006 | 156.05 | 0.0002 | |
| ACE | 3.659E+005 | 1 | 3.659E+005 | 26.03 | 0.0070 | |
| ADE | 1.093E+005 | 1 | 1.093E+005 | 7.77 | 0.0494 | |
| BCD | 1.065E+006 | 1 | 1.065E+006 | 75.77 | 0.0010 | |
| BCE | 3.523E+006 | 1 | 3.523E+006 | 250.65 | <0.0001 | |
| BDE | 3.109E+006 | 1 | 3.109E+006 | 221.17 | 0.0001 | |
| CDE | 14620.50 | 1 | 14620.50 | 1.04 | 0.3654 | |
| ABCE | 2.869E+005 | 1 | 2.869E+005 | 20.41 | 0.0107 | |
| ACDE | 2.957E+005 | 1 | 2.957E+005 | 21.04 | 0.0101 | |
| BCDE | 4.512E+006 | 1 | 4.512E+006 | 321.00 | <0.0001 | |
| Residual | 56223.75 | 4 | 14055.94 | |||
| Cor total | 4.881E+007 | 31 |
The independent variables selected for CCD and their coded values
| Variables | Symbol | Coded values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | −1 | 0 | +1 | + | ||
| pH | A | 6.32 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9.68 |
| Casein | B | −0.21 | 0.10 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 1.31 |
| MgSO4 | C | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
Central composite design runs and results
| Run | A:pH | B:Casein | C:MgSO4 | Enzyme activity (U/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1.000 | 1.000 | −1.000 | 5201 |
| 2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | −1.682 | 4457 |
| 3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3421 |
| 4 | 1.000 | −1.000 | 1.000 | 5364 |
| 5 | 0.000 | −1.682 | 0.000 | 3682 |
| 6 | 0.000 | 1.682 | 0.000 | 3358 |
| 7 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3425 |
| 8 | −1.682 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2126 |
| 9 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3410 |
| 10 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3512 |
| 11 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −1.000 | 3528 |
| 12 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3430 |
| 13 | −1.000 | −1.000 | 1.000 | 1488 |
| 14 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3398 |
| 15 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.682 | 2569 |
| 16 | 1.000 | −1.000 | −1.000 | 4107 |
| 17 | 1.682 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3852 |
| 18 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 2609 |
| 19 | −1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1617 |
| 20 | −1.000 | −1.000 | −1.000 | 2830 |
ANOVA for CCD design results
| Source | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1.910E+007 | 9 | 2.122E+006 | 1276.39 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| A-pH | 3.982E+006 | 1 | 3.982E+006 | 2395.44 | <0.0001 | |
| B-Casein | 1.392E+005 | 1 | 1.392E+005 | 83.74 | <0.0001 | |
| C-MgSO4 | 4.413E+006 | 1 | 4.413E+006 | 2654.43 | <0.0001 | |
| AB | 4.254E+006 | 1 | 4.254E+006 | 2559.06 | <0.0001 | |
| AC | 3.464E+006 | 1 | 3.464E+006 | 2083.43 | <0.0001 | |
| BC | 2.440E+006 | 1 | 2.440E+006 | 1467.57 | <0.0001 | |
| A2 | 3.471E+005 | 1 | 3.471E+005 | 208.77 | <0.0001 | |
| B2 | 15266.04 | 1 | 15266.04 | 9.18 | 0.0127 | |
| C2 | 13032.65 | 1 | 13032.65 | 7.84 | 0.0188 | |
| Residual | 16625.01 | 10 | 1662.50 | |||
| Lack of fit | 8413.68 | 5 | 1682.74 | 1.02 | 0.4897 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 8211.33 | 5 | 1642.27 | |||
| Cor total | 1.911E+007 | 19 |
Fig. 3Three dimensional response surface plots showing the effect of (a) pH and casein, (b) pH and MgSO4 and (c) casein and MgSO4
Fig. 4a SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12%) after coomassie staining. lane 1–DEAE-cellulose fraction; lane 2–affinity chromatography purified enzyme; lane 3–molecular markers. b Fibrin zymography showing the purified fibrinolytic enzyme from B. cereus IND5
Fig. 5Biochemical characterization of the purified fibrinolytic enzyme. a Effect of pH on enzyme activity and stability. Enzyme assay was carried out at 37 °C. b Effect of temperature on enzyme activity and stability. Enzyme assay was carried out at pH 8.0 with 0.1 M Tris buffer. c Effect of various ions on enzyme activity. Enzyme assay was carried out at pH 8.0 and at 50 °C