| Literature DB >> 27713726 |
Golla Ramanjaneyulu1, Bontha Rajasekhar Reddy1.
Abstract
Xylanses are hydrolytic enzymes with wide applications in several industries like biofuels, paper and pulp, deinking, food, and feed. The present study was aimed at hitting at high yield xylanase producing fungi from natural resources. Two highest xylanase producing fungal isolates-Q12 and L1 were picked from collection of 450 fungal cultures for the utilization of xylan. These fungal isolates-Q12 and L1 were identified basing on ITS gene sequencing analysis as Fusarium sp. BVKT R2 (KT119615) and Fusarium strain BRR R6 (KT119619), respectively with construction of phylogenetic trees. Fusarium sp. BVKT R2 was further optimized for maximum xylanase production and the interaction effects between variables on production of xylanase were studied through response surface methodology. The optimal conditions for maximal production of xylanase were sorbitol 1.5%, yeast extract 1.5%, pH of 5.0, Temperature of 32.5°C, and agitation of 175 rpm. Under optimal conditions, the yields of xylanase production by Fusarium sp. BVKT R2 was as high as 4560 U/ml in SmF. Incubation of different lignocellulosic biomasses with crude enzyme of Fusarium sp. BVKT R2 at 37°C for 72 h could achieve about 45% saccharification. The results suggest that Fusarium sp. BVKT R2 has potential applications in saccharification process of biomass.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium sp.; optimization; response surface methodology; saccharification; submerged fermentation; xylanase
Year: 2016 PMID: 27713726 PMCID: PMC5032753 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Range and levels of independent variables for the central composite design used in xylanase production.
| 1 | A | Sorbitol (%) | 0.5 | 2.5 |
| 2 | B | Yeast extract (%) | 0.5 | 2.5 |
| 3 | C | pH | 3.0 | 7 |
| 4 | D | Temperature (°C) | 20 | 45 |
| 5 | E | Agitation (rpm) | 100 | 250 |
Central composite design (CCD) matrix of factors in coded values along with enzyme activity as response.
| 1 | {1} | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 345 | 323.23 |
| 2 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4560 | 4723.53 |
| 3 | {1} | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1295 | 1284.07 |
| 4 | {1} | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1275 | 1249.84 |
| 5 | {1} | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4485 | 4523.39 |
| 6 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4545 | 4353.68 |
| 7 | {1} | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 385 | 368.59 |
| 8 | {1} | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 4525 | 4301.04 |
| 9 | {1} | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1295 | 1303.92 |
| 10 | {1} | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1398 | 1424.29 |
| 11 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4450 | 4723.53 |
| 12 | {1} | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1350 | 1352.64 |
| 13 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4450 | 4723.53 |
| 14 | {1} | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 400 | 375.21 |
| 15 | {1} | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 425 | 405.98 |
| 16 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4450 | 4723.53 |
| 17 | {1} | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 435 | 478.3 |
| 18 | {1} | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3490 | 2480.16 |
| 19 | {1} | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 320 | 395.69 |
| 20 | {1} | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1300 | 1320.1 |
| 21 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4540 | 4335.16 |
| 22 | {1} | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 395 | 377.78 |
| 23 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4545 | 4323.98 |
| 24 | {1} | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 320 | 299.51 |
| 25 | {1} | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1250 | 1301.87 |
| 26 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4560 | 4713.53 |
| 27 | {1} | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 415 | 429.88 |
| 28 | {1} | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 495 | 478.15 |
| 29 | {1} | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2495 | 2480.16 |
| 30 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 4595 | 4387.21 |
| 31 | {1} | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1350 | 1343.08 |
| 32 | {1} | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 410 | 471.06 |
| 33 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 4545 | 4307.57 |
| 34 | {1} | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1260 | 1280.06 |
| 35 | {1} | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 410 | 370.17 |
| 36 | {1} | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 415 | 461.02 |
| 37 | {1} | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1350 | 1372.31 |
| 38 | {1} | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 320 | 307.75 |
| 39 | {1} | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 440 | 382.21 |
| 40 | {1} | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 435 | 420.54 |
| 41 | {1} | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1345 | 1343.63 |
| 42 | {1} | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1195 | 1189.77 |
| 43 | {1} | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1360 | 1392.23 |
| 44 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4555 | 4723.53 |
| 45 | {1} | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1230 | 1291.94 |
| 46 | {1} | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4340 | 4261.04 |
| 47 | {1} | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1345 | 1341.06 |
| 48 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4500 | 4723.53 |
| 49 | {1} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4548 | 4723.53 |
| 50 | {1} | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 430 | 427.82 |
Figure 1Secretion of xylanase and CMCase by fungal isolates of different locations in Eastern Ghats on xylose medium.
Growth, extracellular secretion of protein and change in pH by fungal isolates on xylose medium.
| 1 | B41 | 2.950 | 7.08 | 0.090 |
| 2 | D20 | 2.625 | 7.13 | 0.086 |
| 3 | K2 | 2.330 | 7.06 | 0.117 |
| 4 | H5 | 2.910 | 7.02 | 0.155 |
| 5 | H7 | 2.845 | 6.99 | 0.089 |
| 6 | L1 | 3.095 | 7.12 | 0.237 |
| 7 | A3 | 3.075 | 7.15 | 0.150 |
| 8 | D1 | 3.295 | 6.20 | 0.102 |
| 9 | Q12 | 3.620 | 6.04 | 0.110 |
| 10 | Q22 | 3.695 | 6.73 | 0.073 |
| 11 | Q24 | 3.215 | 7.05 | 0.084 |
| 12 | G2 | 3.430 | 6.58 | 0.089 |
| 13 | C20 | 3.650 | 6.65 | 0.103 |
| 14 | I10 | 3.550 | 6.40 | 0.080 |
| 15 | F3 | 3.200 | 7.13 | 0.098 |
Figure 2ITS region of fungi (Romanelli et al., .
Figure 33D response surface plot showing interaction effects of sorbitol and yeast extract.
Figure 123D response surface plot showing interaction effects of temperature and agitation.
Figure 13Saccharification (%) of biomass with crude enzyme of .
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
| Model | 1.511E+008 | 20 | 7.554E+006 | 79.36 | <0.0001 |
| A-Sorbitol | 7.605E+006 | 1 | 7.605E+006 | 79.90 | <0.0001 |
| B-Yeast extract | 2.94 | 1 | 2.94 | 3.090E−005 | 0.0327 |
| C-pH | 9894.12 | 1 | 9894.12 | 0.10 | 0.0495 |
| D-Temp | 33,988.97 | 1 | 33,988.97 | 0.36 | 0.0448 |
| E-Agitation | 18,124.26 | 1 | 18,124.26 | 0.19 | 0.0658 |
| AB | 13,000.78 | 1 | 13,000.78 | 0.14 | 0.0144 |
| AC | 59,944.53 | 1 | 59,944.53 | 0.63 | 0.0339 |
| AD | 22,313.28 | 1 | 22,313.28 | 0.23 | 0.0319 |
| AE | 19,257.03 | 1 | 19,257.03 | 0.20 | 0.6562 |
| BC | 5125.78 | 1 | 5125.78 | 0.054 | 0.0181 |
| BD | 34,125.78 | 1 | 34,125.78 | 0.36 | 0.0540 |
| BE | 40,969.53 | 1 | 40,969.53 | 0.43 | 0.5169 |
| CD | 7350.78 | 1 | 7350.78 | 0.077 | 0.0031 |
| CE | 9975.78 | 1 | 9975.78 | 0.10 | 0.0485 |
| DE | 31,563.28 | 1 | 31,563.28 | 0.33 | 0.0691 |
| A2 | 7.753E+006 | 1 | 7.753E+006 | 81.45 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 2.234E+006 | 1 | 2.234E+006 | 23.47 | <0.0001 |
| C2 | 4.066E+005 | 1 | 4.066E+005 | 4.27 | 0.0478 |
| D2 | 3.348E+005 | 1 | 3.348E+005 | 3.52 | 0.0708 |
| E2 | 3.819E+005 | 1 | 3.819E+005 | 4.01 | 0.0546 |
| Residual | 2.760E+006 | 29 | 95179.23 | ||
| Lack of fit | 2.741E+006 | 22 | 1.246E+005 | ||
| Pure error | 19362.88 | 7 | 2766.13 | ||
| Core total | 1.538E+008 | 49 |
R.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Figure 14Actual experimental and predicted values of xylanase production.