| Literature DB >> 29462990 |
Subramanium Thiyageshwari1, Pandurangan Gayathri2, Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy3, Rangasamy Anandham4, Diby Paul5.
Abstract
The present study was aimed at using cellulolytic bacterium Enhydrobacter and fungi Aspergillus sp. for preparing compost from rice husk (RH). Further, the prepared compost was tested for their effect on blackgram growth promotion along with different levels of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) in black soil (typic Haplustalf) and red soil (typic Rhodustalf) soil. The results revealed that, inoculation with lignocellulolytic fungus (LCF) Aspergillus sp. @ 2% was considered as the most efficient method of composting within a short period. Characterization of composted rice husk (CRH) was examined through scanning electron microscope (SEM) for identifying significant structural changes. At the end of composting, N, P and K content increased with decrease in CO2 evolution, C:N and C:P ratios. In comparison to inorganic fertilization, an increase in grain yield of 16% in typic Haplustalf and 17% in typic Rhodustalf soil over 100% RDF was obtained from the integrated application of CRH@ 5 t ha-1 with 50% RDF and biofertilizers. The crude protein content was maximum with the combined application of CRH, 50% RDF and biofertilizers of 20% and 21% in typic Haplustalf and typic Rhodustalf soils, respectively. Nutrient rich CRH has proved its efficiency on crop growth and soil fertility.Entities:
Keywords: blackgram; cellulolytic microorganisms; compost; microbial consortium; rice husk
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29462990 PMCID: PMC5858427 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Changes in chemical parameters of rice husk during decomposition on day 15 and 90.
| Treatments | Organic Carbon | Total Nitrogen | Total Phosphorus | Total Potassium | C:N Ratio | C:P Ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | Ratio | |||||||||||
| Day 15 | Day 90 | Day 15 | Day 90 | Day 15 | Day 90 | Day 15 | Day 90 | Day 15 | Day 90 | Day 15 | Day 90 | |
| T1 | 25.80 ± 0.63 | 22.78 ± 0.15 | 0.31 ± 0.01 e | 0.63 ± 0.01 g | 0.20 ± 0.00 f | 0.61 ± 0.01 f | 0.29 ± 0.00 g | 0.78 ± 0.02 h | 83:1 | 36:1 | 129:1 | 37:1 |
| T2 | 25.65 ± 0.11 | 20.76 ± 0.52 | 0.34 ± 0.00 b,c | 0.87 ± 0.01 e | 0.26 ± 0.00 d | 0.78 ± 0.01 d | 0.35 ± 0.01 e | 0.99 ± 0.02 f | 75:1 | 24:1 | 99:1 | 27:1 |
| T3 | 24.60 ± 0.51 | 20.16 ± 0.14 | 0.39 ± 0.00 a | 0.92 ± 0.02 d | 0.32 ± 0.01 b | 0.82 ± 0.00 c,d | 0.43 ± 0.00 c | 1.09 ± 0.03 d | 63:1 | 22:1 | 77:1 | 25:1 |
| T4 | 24.82 ± 0.61 | 19.86 ± 0.37 | 0.36 ± 0.01 b | 0.95 ± 0.01 c | 0.33 ± 0.01 b | 0.86 ± 0.02 c | 0.46 ± 0.01 b | 1.14 ± 0.02 c | 69:1 | 21:1 | 75:1 | 23:1 |
| T5 | 25.62 ± 0.01 | 16.01 ± 0.17 | 0.34 ± 0.00 b,c | 1.10 ± 0.00 a | 0.29 ± 0.00 c | 0.96 ± 0.00 a | 0.44 ± 0.00 b,c | 1.24 ± 0.03 a | 75:1 | 14:1 | 88:1 | 17:1 |
| T6 | 24.72 ± 0.22 | 17.76 ± 0.45 | 0.36 ± 0.01 b | 1.03 ± 0.00 b | 0.36 ± 0.00 a | 0.91 ± 0.01 b | 0.49 ± 0.00 a | 1.19 ± 0.01 b | 69:1 | 17:1 | 69:1 | 20:1 |
| T7 | 25.59 ± 0.36 | 21.77 ± 0.32 | 0.32 ± 0.01 d,e | 0.69 ± 0.01 f | 0.21 ± 0.00 e | 0.69 ± 0.00 e | 0.32 ± 0.00 f | 0.82 ± 0.01 g | 80:1 | 31:1 | 122:1 | 32:1 |
| T8 | 24.78 ± 0.61 | 21.26 ± 0.39 | 0.33 ± 0.01 d,e | 0.70 ± 0.01 f | 0.24 ± 0.00 d | 0.73 ± 0.00 e | 0.38 ± 0.01 d | 1.04 ± 0.00 e | 75:1 | 30:1 | 103:1 | 29:1 |
| LSD ( | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | - | - | - | - |
(T1) Raw Rice Husk (Control); (T2) Raw Rice Husk + Enhydrobacter aerosaccus (LBF 2%); (T3) Raw Rice Husk + Earthworm (Vermicomposting); (T4) Raw Rice Husk + Enhydrobacter aerosaccus + Earthworm; (T5) Raw Rice Husk + Aspergillus sp. (LCF 2%); (T6) Raw Rice Husk + Aspergillus sp. + Earthworm; (T7) Raw Rice Husk + Enhydrobacter aerosaccus + Aspergillus sp.; (T8) Raw Rice Husk + Enhydrobacter aerosaccus + Aspergillus sp. + Earthworm. Data are presented as mean ±SE (standard error) from three replications, letters “a”–“h” represent significant differences between the treatments.
Figure 1Raw rice husk and the degradation stage of rice husk due to inoculation of lignocellulolytic microorganisms. SEM image of raw rice husk with two different magnifications (A,B); composted rice husk (C,D) with two different magnifications.
Effect of composted rice husk (CRH) on yield attributes of blackgram.
| Treatments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branches Per Plant | Pods Per Branch | Grains Per Pod | 100 Grain Weight (g) | Branches Per Plant | Pods Per Branch | Grains Per Pod | 100 Grain Weight (g) | |
| T1 | 1.98 ± 0.05 f | 2.11 ± 0.03 e | 3.01 ± 0.03 e | 3.11 ± 0.02 g | 5.44 ± 0.04 f | 5.60 ± 0.02 i | 4.17 ± 0.01 | 4.15 ± 0.02 |
| T2 | 2.29 ± 0.01 d | 2.45 ± 0.03 c | 3.20 ± 0.05 d | 3.38 ± 0.06 d | 5.81 ± 0.10 d | 6.42 ± 0.06 e | 4.40 ± 0.04 | 4.33 ± 0.02 |
| T3 | 2.41 ±0.05 c | 2.58 ± 0.04 b | 3.33 ± 0.07 c | 3.50 ± 0.04 c | 5.93 ± 0.09 c | 6.57 ± 0.05 d | 4.52 ± 0.01 | 4.52 ± 0.07 |
| T4 | 2.12 ± 0.04 e | 2.25 ± 0.02 d | 3.02 ± 0.03 e | 3.19 ± 0.02 f,g | 5.59 ± 0.14 e | 6.03 ± 0.08 h | 4.20 ± 0.07 | 4.20 ± 0.05 |
| T5 | 2.11 ± 0.05 e | 2.23 ± 0.00 d | 3.02 ± 0.06 e | 3.22 ± 0.04 f,g | 5.56 ± 0.14 e | 5.97 ± 0.08 h | 4.18 ± 0.09 | 4.18 ± 0.02 |
| T6 | 2.14 ± 0.03 e | 2.29 ± 0.01 d | 3.03 ± 0.02 e | 3.26 ± 0.06 e,f | 5.63 ± 0.12 e | 6.16 ± 0.07 g | 4.25 ± 0.03 | 4.25 ± 0.03 |
| T7 | 2.26 ± 0.05 d | 2.41 ± 0.02 c | 3.17 ± 0.06 d | 3.36 ± 0.01 d,e | 5.74 ± 0.04 d | 6.29 ± 0.02 f | 4.38 ± 0.02 | 4.38 ± 0.07 |
| T8 | 2.56 ± 0.04 b | 2.65 ± 0.02 b | 3.56 ± 0.09 b | 3.71 ± 0.03 b | 6.25 ± 0.03 b | 6.89 ± 0.02 b | 4.64 ± 0.05 | 4.64 ± 0.09 |
| T9 | 2.53 ± 0.04 b | 2.63 ± 0.06 b | 3.43 ± 0.08 c | 3.68 ± 0.07 b | 6.12 ± 0.03 b | 6.71 ± 0.01 c | 4.55 ± 0.11 | 4.55 ± 0.11 |
| T10 | 2.68 ± 0.03 a | 3.78 ± 0.03 a | 3.76 ± 0.04 a | 3.94 ± 0.01 a | 7.16 ± 0.18 a | 7.45 ± 0.10 a | 4.70 ± 0.02 | 4.80 ± 0.05 |
| T11 | 1.85 ± 0.04 g | 1.98 ± 0.03 f | 2.99 ± 0.07 f | 3.03 ± 0.06 h | 5.33 ± 0.12 g | 5.41 ± 0.07 j | 4.15 ± 0.03 | 4.12 ± 0.08 |
| LSD ( | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | NS | NS |
T1—CRH; T2—50% RDF; T3—100% RDF; T4—CRH + R; T5—CRH + PSB; T6—CRH + R + PSB; T7—CRH + 50% RDF; T8—CRH + 50% RDF + R; T9—CRH + 50% RDF + PSB; T10—CRH + 50% RDF + R + PSB; T11—Control. Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) = 25:50:25:20 kg of N:P2O5:K2O:S ha−1. Rhizobium (R) and Phosphobacterium (PSB) @ 2 kg ha−1; composted rice husk (CRH) @ 5 tonnes ha−1. Data are presented as mean ±SE (standard error) from five replications, letters “a”–“j” represent significant differences between the treatments.
Effect of composted rice husk (CRH) on the yield and protein content of blackgram.
| Treatments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grain Yield Per kg/ha | Haulm Yield Per kg/ha | Protein Content % | Grain Yield Per kg/ ha | Haulm Yield Per kg/ha | Grain Crude Protein Content % | |
| T1 | 585 ± 9.89 g | 1265 ± 14.55 f | 15.50 ± 0.34 | 579 ± 8.20 g | 1284 ± 20.18 g | 16.75 ± 0.20 e |
| T2 | 779 ± 18.65 d | 1475 ± 16.12 c | 16.75 ± 0.11 | 783 ± 19.15 d | 1477 ± 11.53 d | 18.06 ± 0.07 c,d |
| T3 | 848 ± 11.92 c | 1550 ± 39.53 c | 17.69 ± 0.07 | 849 ± 21.65 c | 1555 ± 2.43 c | 19.06 ± 0.04 c |
| T4 | 649 ± 15.87 f | 1346 ± 1.40 e | 15.56 ± 0.12 | 655 ± 16.02 f | 1353 ± 13.38 f | 16.88 ± 0.07 e |
| T5 | 675 ± 5.27 e,f | 1318 ± 4.80 e | 15.63 ± 0.19 | 640 ± 7.99 f | 1337 ± 10.44 f | 17.00 ± 0.11 e |
| T6 | 670 ± 15.69 e,f | 1366 ± 14.22 d,e | 15.69 ± 0.17 | 666 ± 9.71 f | 1370 ± 4.28 e,f | 17.06 ± 0.10 d,e |
| T7 | 711 ± 14.06 e | 1409 ± 33.00 d | 16.56 ± 0.19 | 725 ± 8.30 e | 1417 ± 16.96 e | 17.13 ± 0.11 d,e |
| T8 | 921 ± 7.19 b | 1644 ± 22.25 b | 19.25 ± 0.21 | 937 ± 8.29 b | 1692 ± 1.76 b | 20.30 ± 0.12 b |
| T9 | 912 ± 8.07 b | 1621 ± 30.37 b | 18.50 ± 0.25 | 932 ± 0.49 b | 1688 ± 36.90 b | 20.00 ± 0.14 b |
| T10 | 988 ± 23.65 a | 1712 ± 17.82 a | 20.19 ± 0.36 | 994 ± 12.42 a | 1752 ± 12.77 a | 21.44 ± 0.21 a |
| T11 | 510 ± 9.02 h | 1006 ± 10.99 g | 13.63 ± 0.28 | 522 ± 2.17 h | 1056 ± 7.69 h | 15.63 ± 0.16 f |
| LSD ( | 58.78 | 66.10 | 1.15 | 53.51 | 56.02 | 1.04 |
T1—CRH; T2—50% RDF; T3—100% RDF; T4—CRH + R; T5—CRH + PSB; T6—CRH + R + PSB; T7—CRH + 50% RDF; T8—CRH + 50% RDF + R; T9—CRH + 50% RDF + PSB; T10—CRH + 50% RDF + R + PSB; T11—Control. Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) = 25:50:25:20 kg of N:P2O5:K2O: S ha−1 Rhizobium (R) and Phosphobacterium (PSB) @ 2 kg ha−1; composted rice husk (CRH) @ 5 tonnes ha−1. Data are presented as mean ± SE (standard error) from five replications, letters “a”–“h” represent significant differences between the treatments.
Figure 2Effect of composted rice husk (CRH) on nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium uptake (kg ha−1) by grain and halum of blackgram in Typic Haplustalf. * indicates significant different from other treatment.
Figure 3Effect of composted rice husk (CRH) on nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium uptake (kg ha−1) by grain and halum of blackgram in Typic Rhodustalf. * indicates significant different from other treatment.