Literature DB >> 26496735

The impact of surgical quality on prognosis in patients undergoing rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation.

Marcus Kiehlmann, Klaus Weber, Jonas Göhl, Rainer Fietkau, Abbas Agaimy, Werner Hohenberger, Susanne Merkel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of surgical quality on the prognosis of rectal carcinoma patients who underwent preoperative long-term chemoradiation and TME surgery.
METHODS: In a total of 314 patients, four quality indicators, including plane of surgery, pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM), intraoperative local tumour cell dissemination and anastomotic leakage, were analysed with respect to locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis and overall survival.
RESULTS: In 260 (82.8 %) of the patients, all four quality indicators were fulfilled. In 30 (9.6 %) of the patients, at least one quality indicator was not fulfilled; in 24 (7.6 %) of the patients, the data were not complete. Locoregional recurrence was significantly increased in patients who underwent surgery in the muscularis propria plane, who had a pCRM ≤ 1 mm or who experienced local tumour cell dissemination. In patients who had at least one quality indicator that was not fulfilled (suboptimal surgical quality), the 5-year rate of locoregional recurrence in those patients was 23.1 % compared to 4.8 % in patients who underwent optimal surgery (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, suboptimal surgery (hazard ratio (HR) 3.9; P = 0.020), abdominoperineal excision (HR 4.7; P = 0.003) and poor regression of primary tumours (HR 8.5; P < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence. In contrast to type of surgical treatment, ypT, ypN and regression grade, the quality of surgery did not significantly influence distant metastasis or overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Even after preoperative chemoradiation, the surgical quality still has a strong impact on local control in patients with rectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26496735     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2421-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Jürgen Weitz; Werner Hohenberger; Richard J Heald; Brendan Moran; Alexis Ulrich; Torbjörn Holm; W Douglas Wong; Emmanuel Tiret; Yoshihiro Moriya; Søren Laurberg; Marcel den Dulk; Cornelis van de Velde; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Claus Rödel; Peter Martus; Thomas Papadoupolos; Laszlo Füzesi; Martin Klimpfinger; Rainer Fietkau; Torsten Liersch; Werner Hohenberger; Rudolf Raab; Rolf Sauer; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  O Dworak; L Keilholz; A Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga; Mithat Gonen; Jinru Shia; Karyn A Goodman; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; José G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma--experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  P Hermanek; H Wiebelt; D Staimmer; S Riedl
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.098

8.  Prognosis of rectal carcinoma after multimodal treatment: ypTNM classification and tumor regression grading are essential.

Authors:  Paul Hermanek; Susanne Merkel; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Merkel; W Y Wang; O Schmidt; O Dworak; C Wittekind; W Hohenberger; P Hermanek
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for Colorectal Cancer - Trends, Developments, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Markus Rentsch; Tobias Schiergens; Andrej Khandoga; Jens Werner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-13

2.  The quality of total mesorectal excision specimen: A review of its macroscopic assessment and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Shi-Bo Song; Guo-Ju Wu; Hong-Da Pan; Hua Yang; Mao-Lin Hu; Qiang Li; Qiu-Xia Yan; Gang Xiao
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.