Iris D Nagtegaal1, Phil Quirke. 1. Department of Pathology 824, University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. i.nagtegaal@pathol.umcn.nl
Abstract
PURPOSE: Treatment of rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the last decade. The worldwide introduction of total mesorectal excision in combination with the increasing use of radio(chemo)-therapy has led to an improved prognosis. One of the main prognostic factors in rectal cancer is the circumferential resection margin (CRM). Since the initial description of its clinical importance in 1986, the involvement of this margin (also called lateral or radial resection margin) has been associated with a poor prognosis. METHODS: In the current review, the evidence for the importance of the CRM in more than 17,500 patients is reviewed, and the relevance of this assessment to modern treatment is assessed. RESULTS: We demonstrate that, after neoadjuvant therapy (both radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy), the predictive value of the CRM for local recurrence is significantly higher than when no preoperative therapy has been applied (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.3 v 2.0, respectively; P < .05). Furthermore, involvement of the CRM is a powerful predictor of both development of distant metastases (HR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.3) and survival (HR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.3). In addition to the prognostic data, this review describes different modes of margin involvement, exact definitions, and factors influencing its presence. CONCLUSION: CRM involvement is one of the key factors in rectal cancer treatment.
PURPOSE: Treatment of rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the last decade. The worldwide introduction of total mesorectal excision in combination with the increasing use of radio(chemo)-therapy has led to an improved prognosis. One of the main prognostic factors in rectal cancer is the circumferential resection margin (CRM). Since the initial description of its clinical importance in 1986, the involvement of this margin (also called lateral or radial resection margin) has been associated with a poor prognosis. METHODS: In the current review, the evidence for the importance of the CRM in more than 17,500 patients is reviewed, and the relevance of this assessment to modern treatment is assessed. RESULTS: We demonstrate that, after neoadjuvant therapy (both radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy), the predictive value of the CRM for local recurrence is significantly higher than when no preoperative therapy has been applied (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.3 v 2.0, respectively; P < .05). Furthermore, involvement of the CRM is a powerful predictor of both development of distant metastases (HR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.3) and survival (HR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.3). In addition to the prognostic data, this review describes different modes of margin involvement, exact definitions, and factors influencing its presence. CONCLUSION: CRM involvement is one of the key factors in rectal cancer treatment.
Authors: Samantha J Hauff; Sharat C Raju; Ryan K Orosco; Andrew M Gross; Julio A Diaz-Perez; Elamprakash Savariar; Nadia Nashi; Jonathan Hasselman; Michael Whitney; Jeffrey N Myers; Scott M Lippman; Roger Y Tsien; Trey Ideker; Quyen T Nguyen Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga; Mithat Gonen; Jinru Shia; Karyn A Goodman; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; José G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Martin R Weiser Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 5.344