Alireza Baratloo1, Mostafa Hosseini2, Ahmed Negida3, Gehad El Ashal4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. 4. Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Emergency physicians, like other specialists, are faced with different patients and various situations every day. They have to use ancillary diagnostic tools like laboratory tests and imaging studies to be able to manage them (1-8). In most cases, numerous tests are available. Tests with the least error and the most accuracy are more desirable. The power of a test to separate patients from healthy people determines its accuracy and diagnostic value (9). Therefore, a test with 100% accuracy should be the first choice. This does not happen in reality as the accuracy of a test varies for different diseases and in different situations. For example, the value of D-dimer for diagnosing pulmonary embolism varies based on pre-test probability. It shows high accuracy in low risk patient and low accuracy in high risk ones. The characteristics of a test that reflects the aforementioned abilities are accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios (9-11). In this educational review, we will simply define and calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of a hypothetical test.Definitions:Patient: positive for diseaseHealthy: negative for diseaseTrue positive (TP) = the number of cases correctly identified as patientFalse positive (FP) = the number of cases incorrectly identified as patientTrue negative (TN) = the number of cases correctly identified as healthyFalse negative (FN) = the number of cases incorrectly identified as healthyAccuracy: The accuracy of a test is its ability to differentiate the patient and healthy cases correctly. To estimate the accuracy of a test, we should calculate the proportion of true positive and true negative in all evaluated cases. Mathematically, this can be stated as:Sensitivity: The sensitivity of a test is its ability to determine the patient cases correctly. To estimate it, we should calculate the proportion of true positive in patient cases. Mathematically, this can be stated as:Specificity: The specificity of a test is its ability to determine the healthy cases correctly. To estimate it, we should calculate the proportion of true negative in healthy cases. Mathematically, this can be stated as:Examples:Scenario 1Imagine we have a sample of 100 cases, 50 healthy and the others patient. If a test can be positive for all patients and be negative for all the healthy ones, it is 100% accurate. In figure 1, arrow shows the test and it has been able to differentiate the healthy and patient exactly. In this example, the sensitivity of the test is 50 divided by 50 or 100% and its specificity in determining the healthy people is 50 divided by 50 or 100%.
Figure 1
A schematic presentation of an example test with 100% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity
Taking into account the mentioned statistical characteristics, this test is appropriate for both screening and final verification of a disease.A schematic presentation of an example test with 100% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificityA schematic presentation of an example test with 75% accuracy, 50% sensitivity, and 100% specificity.A schematic presentation of an example test with 75% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 50% specificity.Scenario 2If the test can only diagnose 25 out of the 50 patients and has reported the others as healthy (Figure 2); accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity will be as follows:
Figure 2
A schematic presentation of an example test with 75% accuracy, 50% sensitivity, and 100% specificity.
Accuracy: Of the 100 cases that have been tested, the test could determine 25 patients and 50 healthy cases correctly. Therefore, the accuracy of the test is equal to 75 divided by 100 or 75%.Sensitivity: From the 50 patients, the test has only diagnosed 25. Therefore, its sensitivity is 25 divided by 50 or 50%.Specificity: From the 50 healthy people, the test has correctly pointed out all 50. Therefore, its specificity is 50 divided by 50 or 100%.According to these statistical characteristics, this test is not suitable for screening purposes; but it is suited for the final confirmation of a disease.Scenario 3This time we will assume that the test has been able to identify 25 of the 50 healthy cases and has reported the others as patients (Figure 3). In this scenario accuracy, sensitivity and specificity will be as follows:
Figure 3
A schematic presentation of an example test with 75% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 50% specificity.
Accuracy: Of the 100 cases that have been tested, the test could identify 25 healthy cases and 50 patients correctly. Therefore, the accuracy of the test is equal to 75 divided by 100 or 75%.Sensitivity: From the 50 patients, the test has diagnosed all 50. Therefore, its sensitivity is 50 divided by 50 or 100%.Specificity: From the 50 healthy cases, the test has correctly pointed out only 25. Therefore, its specificity is 25 divided by 50 or 50%.According to these statistical characteristics, this test is suited for screening purposes but it is not suitable for the final confirmation of a disease.
Authors: G Alexander Fleming; John R Petrie; Richard M Bergenstal; Reinhard W Holl; Anne L Peters; Lutz Heinemann Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Heléne Norder; Marie Karlsson; Åsa Mellgren; Jan Konar; Elisabeth Sandberg; Anders Lasson; Maria Castedal; Lars Magnius; Martin Lagging Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 5.948