Literature DB >> 12217073

The interpretation of diagnostic test: a primer for physiotherapists.

Megan Davidson1.   

Abstract

This paper outlines a practical approach to assist physiotherapists to interpret the results of diagnostic or screening tests. Diagnostic tests are used during clinical assessment to increase or decrease the clinician's estimate of the likelihood that a client has a particular condition. A negative result for a test that is 100% sensitive can rule a condition out (SnOUT), and a positive result for a test that is 100% specific can rule a condition in (SpIN). However, tests are rarely 100% accurate, and false-positive and false-negative results can occur. The examining therapist needs to estimate the probability that a client has a particular condition (the pre-test probability), then estimate the extent to which they are more or less certain given a positive or negative test result (the post-test probability). The likelihood ratio, which combines the information provided by a test's sensitivity and specificity, is the most useful tool for the clinical interpretation of test results.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217073     DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60228-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  18 in total

1.  A Randomised Assessment of Trainee Doctors' Understanding and Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Results.

Authors:  V L Parker; J E Ritchie; T M Drake; J Hookham; S P Balasubramanian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A review of the use of likelihood ratios in the chiropractic literature.

Authors:  Michael T Haneline
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2007-09

3.  The importance of diagnostic test parameters in the interpretation of clinical test findings: The Prone Hip Extension Test as an example.

Authors:  Paul Bruno
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2011-06

4.  Accuracy of monitoring serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in postoperative stage III colorectal cancer patients is limited to only the first postoperative year.

Authors:  Masayasu Hara; Mikinori Sato; Hiroki Takahashi; Satoru Takayama; Hiromitsu Takeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Increased triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio may be associated with reduction in the low-density lipoprotein particle size: assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Katsuaki Yokoyama; Shigemasa Tani; Rei Matsuo; Naoya Matsumoto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Wet voice as a sign of penetration/aspiration in Parkinson's disease: does testing material matter?

Authors:  Marília Sampaio; Natalie Argolo; Ailton Melo; Ana Caline Nóbrega
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  A prospective study of shoulder pain in primary care: prevalence of imaged pathology and response to guided diagnostic blocks.

Authors:  Angela Cadogan; Mark Laslett; Wayne A Hing; Peter J McNair; Mark H Coates
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Pediatric Sepsis Biomarker Risk Model Biomarkers and Estimation of Myocardial Dysfunction in Pediatric Septic Shock.

Authors:  Andrew J Lautz; Hector R Wong; Thomas D Ryan; Christopher J Statile
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.971

9.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests Assessing Ligamentous Injury of the Talocrural and Subtalar Joints: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fredh Netterström-Wedin; Mark Matthews; Chris Bleakley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Elevated Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Recurrence in Postoperative Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: Comparison With Stage III.

Authors:  Ho Seung Kim; Min Ro Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.