C Marius Hoogerboord1, Adrian R Levy2, Min Hu2, Gordon Flowerdew2, Geoffrey Porter2. 1. Division of General Surgery (Hoogerboord, Porter), Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Hoogerboord, Levy, Flowerdew, Porter), Dalhousie University; Department of Economics (Hu), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS hoogerboord@gmail.com. 2. Division of General Surgery (Hoogerboord, Porter), Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Hoogerboord, Levy, Flowerdew, Porter), Dalhousie University; Department of Economics (Hu), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence from randomized controlled trials published since 2004 shows that elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer improves short-term postoperative outcomes with equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open colectomy. The objective of this study was to examine the uptake of elective laparoscopic colectomy in Canada and compare its use among Canadian provinces. METHODS: In this descriptive analysis, we identified from hospital discharge abstracts all patients in the Canadian provinces (except Quebec) who underwent elective colectomy for colon cancer between 2004/05 and 2014/15. We compared temporal changes in the proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy or open colectomy among provinces using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 63 504 patients who underwent elective colectomy between 2004/05 and 2014/15, 19 691 (31.0%) underwent laparoscopic colectomy. The annual proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy increased from 9.2% in 2004/05 to 51.5% in 2014/15 (mean annual percent increase 4.2%). There were significant differences between provinces in the overall proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy (p < 0.001), ranging from 7.6% in Newfoundland and Labrador to 36.9% in Ontario. By 2014/15, most colectomy procedures were performed laparoscopically in 3 provinces; British Columbia (60.2%), Ontario (59.4%) and Alberta (53.1%). In addition to year and province, urban residence, younger age, female sex, fewer medical comorbidities, high surgeon volume, high hospital volume and right-sided tumours were significantly associated with increased likelihood of laparoscopic colectomy. INTERPRETATION: Although the use of laparoscopic colectomy increased rapidly between 2004/05 and 2014/15 in Canada, substantial interprovincial variation exists. Further knowledge-translation strategies are needed to ensure equal access to laparoscopic colectomy for all Canadians. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Evidence from randomized controlled trials published since 2004 shows that elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer improves short-term postoperative outcomes with equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open colectomy. The objective of this study was to examine the uptake of elective laparoscopic colectomy in Canada and compare its use among Canadian provinces. METHODS: In this descriptive analysis, we identified from hospital discharge abstracts all patients in the Canadian provinces (except Quebec) who underwent elective colectomy for colon cancer between 2004/05 and 2014/15. We compared temporal changes in the proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy or open colectomy among provinces using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 63 504 patients who underwent elective colectomy between 2004/05 and 2014/15, 19 691 (31.0%) underwent laparoscopic colectomy. The annual proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy increased from 9.2% in 2004/05 to 51.5% in 2014/15 (mean annual percent increase 4.2%). There were significant differences between provinces in the overall proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy (p < 0.001), ranging from 7.6% in Newfoundland and Labrador to 36.9% in Ontario. By 2014/15, most colectomy procedures were performed laparoscopically in 3 provinces; British Columbia (60.2%), Ontario (59.4%) and Alberta (53.1%). In addition to year and province, urban residence, younger age, female sex, fewer medical comorbidities, high surgeon volume, high hospital volume and right-sided tumours were significantly associated with increased likelihood of laparoscopic colectomy. INTERPRETATION: Although the use of laparoscopic colectomy increased rapidly between 2004/05 and 2014/15 in Canada, substantial interprovincial variation exists. Further knowledge-translation strategies are needed to ensure equal access to laparoscopic colectomy for all Canadians. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Marc Zerey; Lisa Martin Hawver; Ziad Awad; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 May 14-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jon D Vogel; Cagla Eskicioglu; Martin R Weiser; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Alessio Pigazzi; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Masoud Babaei; Yesilda Balavarca; Lina Jansen; Adam Gondos; Valery Lemmens; Annika Sjövall; Tom Brge Johannesen; Michel Moreau; Liberale Gabriel; Ana Filipa Gonçalves; Maria José Bento; Tony van de Velde; Lana Raffaela Kempfer; Nikolaus Becker; Alexis Ulrich; Cornelia M Ulrich; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Marius Hoogerboord; James Ellsmere; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Carl Brown; Shiva Jayaraman; David Urbach; Sean Cleary Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 2.089