Literature DB >> 28493219

A critical appraisal of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for oncological and non-oncological resections.

Muhammad Shafique Sajid1, Munir Ahmad Rathore2, Mirza Khurrum Baig3, Parv Sains4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to critically appraise the cost effectiveness of the laparoscopic colorectal (LCRS) surgery using published randomised, control trials (RCTs). Published RCTs comparing the cost effectiveness of LCRS with conventional open surgery were selected from the search of standard electronic databases and the extracted data were analysed using the statistical software RevMan 5.3. Seven RCTs on 2197 patients reported the cost effectiveness of the LCRS. There was significant heterogeneity (τ 2 = 161,772.25, χ 2 = 166.69, df = 6, p = 0.00001, I 2 = 96%) among included randomised, controlled trials. In the random effects model analysis (MD 320.37, 95% CI -38.21, 678.95, z = 1.75, p < 0.08), the LCRS was costing £320.37 more than open colorectal resection but it failed to reach the statistical significance indicating that LCRS is as much cost effective as the open approach. LCRS is a cost effective intervention and should be offered routinely to all patients requiring colorectal resections provided the resources and expertise are available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Cost effectiveness; Laparoscopic colorectal surgery; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28493219     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0458-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  30 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic versus open fecal diversion: does laparoscopy offer better outcomes in short term?

Authors:  E Gorgun; F C Gezen; E Aytac; L Stocchi; M M Costedio; F H Remzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a prospective cost analysis.

Authors:  H M Dowson; H Gage; D Jackson; Y Qiao; P Williams; T A Rockall
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Colorectal carcinoma: laparoscopic versus traditional open surgery. A clinical trial.

Authors:  E Santoro; M Carlini; F Carboni; A Feroce
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

8.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  T C Chalmers; H Smith; B Blackburn; B Silverman; B Schroeder; D Reitman; A Ambroz
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1981-05

9.  Risk of readmission after laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Iyare O Esemuede; Alodia Gabre-Kidan; Dennis L Fowler; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis: How I do it?

Authors:  Manish A Madnani; Jitendra H Mistry; Harshad N Soni; Atul J Shah; Kantilal S Patel; Sanjiv P Haribhakti
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.