| Literature DB >> 26484547 |
Antonio Bevilacqua1, Monica Mischitelli2, Valeria Pietropaolo2, Emanuela Ciuffreda1, Milena Sinigaglia1, Maria Rosaria Corbo1.
Abstract
Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris is the main cause of most spoilage problems in fruit juices and acidic products. Since soil borne species often contaminate fruit juices and do not need strict extreme requirements for survival, it is a great concern to investigate whether and how soil species could evolve from their ecological niches in microbial community to new environments as fruit juices. In this study, 23 isolates of thermo-acidophilic, spore-forming bacteria from soil were characterized by cultural and molecular methods. In addition, 2 strains isolated from a spoilage incident in pear juice were typed. Strains phenotyping showed that they could be grouped into 3 different clusters, and some isolates showed identical or quite similar patterns. Analyzing pH and temperature ranges for growth, the majority of strains were able to grow at values described for many species of Alicyclobacillus. Qualitative utilization of lysine, arginine and indole production from tryptophan revealed, for the first time, deamination of lysine and decarboxylation of arginine. Resistance to 5% NaCl as well as the ability to hydrolyze starch and gelatin, nitrate reduction, catalase and oxidase activities confirmed literature evidences. Examining of 16S rRNA, showed that isolates were divided into three blocks represented by effectively soil species and strains that are moving from soil to other possible growing source characterized by parameters that could strongly influence bacterial survival. RAPD PCR technique evidenced a great variability in banding patterns and, although it was not possible to obtain genotypically well-distinguished groups, it was feasible to appreciate genetic similarity between some strains. In conclusion, the investigation of a microbial community entails a combination of metagenomic and classic culture-dependent approaches to expand our knowledge about Alicyclobacillus and to look for new subspecies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26484547 PMCID: PMC4618475 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Clustering of isolated A. acidoterrestris strains considering some biochemical traits.
pH growth profile of A. acidoterrestris strains (the error of pH was ±0.05).
| Strains | pH range (min-max) |
|---|---|
| C2, C4, C5, C6, C11, C19, C21, C22, C23, C24 | 2.5–6.5 |
| C13, C20, C25 | 2.5–6.0 |
| C10, C14, C15, C16, C17, C18 | 2.5–5.5 |
| CB-1, CB-2 | 3.0–6.5 |
| C1, C3, C8, C12 | 3.0–5.5 |
Temperature profile of A. acidoterrestris strains (the error of T was ±1°C).
| Strains | Growth temperature (°C) (min-max) |
|---|---|
| C13, C19, C24, C25 | 25–70 |
| C1, C2, C10, C14, C20 | 25–65 |
| C3, C4, C5, C6, C8, C11, C12, C15, C16, C22, C23 | 25–55 |
| C17 | 30–55 |
| C18, C21 | 35–60 |
| CB1, CB2 | 35–55 |
Fig 2Eulero-Venn diagram for amino-acid utilization.
ARG, deamination of arginine; LYS, decarboxylation of lysine; TRP, production of indole.
Identity percentage between 16S sequences obtained from studied strains and 16S sequences filed at NCBI website.
The strain CB-1 was referred as “γ4” in Bevilacqua and Corbo [5].
| SAMPLE | REFERENCE STRAIN(NCBI 16S RIBOSOMAL DATABASE) | IDENTITY | STRAIN(NCBI NUCLEOTIDE DATABASE) | IDENTITY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | DSM 3922 | 935/982 (95%) | FB40 (KF880723)source:debris from factory floor | 935/982 (95%) |
| C2 | DSM 3922 | 628/675 (93%) | FB40 (KF880723)source: debris from factory floor | 628/675 (93%) |
| C3 | DSM 3922 | 695/698 (99%) | FB40 (KF880723)source: debris from factory floor | 695/698 (99%) |
| C4 | DSM 3922 | 602/674 (89%) | FB40 (KF880723)source: debris from factory floor | 602/674 (89%) |
| C5 | ATCC 49025 | 680/698 (97%) | UFRRJAT1 (KC783431.1)source:orange juice | 686/698 (98%) |
| C6 | DSM 3922 | 890/898 (99%) | C-ZJB-12-31 (KC354628)source: fruit from the orchard in Bairui kiwi fruit Experimental Base | 895/898 (99%) |
| C8 | ATCC 49025 | 1400/1407 (99%) | XC-6 (KJ158157)source: maize juice | 1396/1401 (99%) |
| C10 | DSM 3922 | 950/995 (95%) | C-ZJB-12-36 (KC354633)source: fruit from the orchard in Bairui kiwi fruit Experimental Base | 953/988 (96%) |
| C11 | DSM 3922 | 771/774 (99%) | C-ZJB-12-65 (KC354683)source: soil from the orchard in Liujiabao village | 771/773 (99%) |
| C12 | DSM 3922 | 927/950 (98%) | C-ZJB-12-44 (KC354669)source: fruit from the orchard in Changdong village | 925/945 (98%) |
| C13 | DSM 3922 | 813/814 (99%) | FB40 (KF880723)source: debris from factory floor | 813/814 (99%) |
| C14 | DSM 3922 | 878/879 (99%) | FB40 (KF880723)source: debris from factory floor | 878/879 (99%) |
| C15 | ATCC 49025 | 708/725 (98%) | UFRRJAT1 (KC783431.1)source: orange juice | 714/725(98%) |
| C16 | ATCC 49025 | 902/904 (99%) | XC-6 (KJ158157)source: maize juice | 902/904(99%) |
| C17 | DSM 3922 | 896/914 (98%) | C-ZJB-12-12 (KC193187)source: shop environment (walls) | 903/921 (98%) |
| C18 | DSM 3922 | 945/974 (97%) | C-ZJB-12-10 (KC193186)source: kiwi fruits after washing | 950/978 (97%) |
| C19 | ATCC 49025 | 840/851(99%) | XC-6 (KJ158157)source: maize juice | 845/855 (99%) |
| C20 | DSM 3922 | 882/884 (99%) | C-ZJB-12-10 (KC193186)source: kiwi fruits after washing | 884/885 (99%) |
| C21 | DSM 3922 | 800/803 (99%) | C-ZJB-12-64 (KC354682)source: soil from the orchard in Liujiabao village | 801/803 (99%) |
| C22 | DSM3922 | 885/896 (99%) | C-ZJB-12-44 (KC354669)source: fruit from the orchard in Changdong village | 886/894 (99%) |
| C23 | DSM3922 | 882/889 (99%) | C-ZJB-12-17 (KC193190)source: shop environment (raw material bins) | 883/887 (99%) |
| C24 | ATCC 49025 | 1404/1407 (99%) | XC-6 (KJ158157)source: maize juice | 1399/1400 (99%) |
| C25 | ATCC 49025 | 717/721 (99%) | XC-6 (KJ158157)source: maize juice | 717/721 (99%) |
| CB-1 | ATCC 49025 | 1392/1407 (99%) | CB-1 (KP144333)source: pear juice | / |
| CB-2 | ATCC 49025 | 878/879 (99%) | XC-6 (KJ158157)source: maize juice | 878/879 (99%) |
*Identification should be confirmed
Fig 3Evolutionary relationships of taxa.
(The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.79567517 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method and are in the units of the number of base differences per site. The analysis involved 29 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 573 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6.).
Fig 4RAPD PCR products obtained amplifying chromosomal DNA of studied A. acidoterrestris strains as the template, primer BA-10 was used.
Section A: Lanes 1 and 18: A. acidoterrestris DSM3922T and DSM2498. Lane 2: C1, lane 3: C2, lane 4: C3, lane 5: C4, lane 6; C5, lane 7: C6, lane 8: C8, lane 9: C10, lane 10: C11, lane 11: C12, lane 12: C13, lane 13: C14, lane 15: C15, lane 16: C17, lane 17: C18. Lanes M: size marker: O’GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. MA USA). Section B: Lanes 1 and 11: A. acidoterrestris DSM3922T and DSM2498. Lane 2: C19, lane 3: C20, lane 4: C21, lane 5: C22, lane 6; C23, lane 7: C24, lane 8: C25, lane 9: CB-1, lane 10: CB-2. Lanes M: size marker: O’GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. MA USA).
Fig 6RAPD PCR products obtained amplifying chromosomal DNA of studied A. acidoterrestris strains as the template, primer F-61 was used.