Literature DB >> 33906403

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals and unpacks a biodiversity conservation paradox in Mediterranean marine reserves.

Emilie Boulanger1,2, Nicolas Loiseau2, Alice Valentini3, Véronique Arnal1, Pierre Boissery4, Tony Dejean3, Julie Deter5, Nacim Guellati2, Florian Holon5, Jean-Baptiste Juhel2, Philippe Lenfant6, Stéphanie Manel1, David Mouillot2,7.   

Abstract

Although we are currently experiencing worldwide biodiversity loss, local species richness does not always decline under anthropogenic pressure. This conservation paradox may also apply in protected areas but has not yet received conclusive evidence in marine ecosystems. Here, we survey fish assemblages in six Mediterranean no-take reserves and their adjacent fishing grounds using environmental DNA (eDNA) while controlling for environmental conditions. We detect less fish species in marine reserves than in nearby fished areas. The paradoxical gradient in species richness is accompanied by a marked change in fish species composition under different managements. This dissimilarity is mainly driven by species that are often overlooked by classical visual surveys but detected with eDNA: cryptobenthic, pelagic, and rare fishes. These results do not negate the importance of reserves in protecting biodiversity but shed new light on how under-represented species groups can positively react to fishing pressure and how conservation efforts can shape regional biodiversity patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alpha and beta diversity; environmental DNA metabarcoding; marine reserves

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33906403      PMCID: PMC8080007          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  55 in total

1.  Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities.

Authors:  Ransom A Myers; Boris Worm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss.

Authors:  Maria Dornelas; Nicholas J Gotelli; Brian McGill; Hideyasu Shimadzu; Faye Moyes; Caya Sievers; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The rise of a marine generalist predator and the fall of beta diversity.

Authors:  Kari E Ellingsen; Nigel G Yoccoz; Torkild Tveraa; Kenneth T Frank; Edda Johannesen; Marti J Anderson; Andrey V Dolgov; Nancy L Shackell
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Pelagic Subsidies Underpin Fish Productivity on a Degraded Coral Reef.

Authors:  Renato A Morais; David R Bellwood
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas.

Authors:  Jennifer E Caselle; Andrew Rassweiler; Scott L Hamilton; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Environmental DNA illuminates the dark diversity of sharks.

Authors:  Germain Boussarie; Judith Bakker; Owen S Wangensteen; Stefano Mariani; Lucas Bonnin; Jean-Baptiste Juhel; Jeremy J Kiszka; Michel Kulbicki; Stephanie Manel; William D Robbins; Laurent Vigliola; David Mouillot
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets.

Authors:  E Dinerstein; C Vynne; E Sala; A R Joshi; S Fernando; T E Lovejoy; J Mayorga; D Olson; G P Asner; J E M Baillie; N D Burgess; K Burkart; R F Noss; Y P Zhang; A Baccini; T Birch; N Hahn; L N Joppa; E Wikramanayake
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community.

Authors:  Anni Djurhuus; Collin J Closek; Ryan P Kelly; Kathleen J Pitz; Reiko P Michisaki; Hilary A Starks; Kristine R Walz; Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz; Emily Olesin; Katherine Hubbard; Enrique Montes; Daniel Otis; Frank E Muller-Karger; Francisco P Chavez; Alexandria B Boehm; Mya Breitbart
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Overfishing and habitat loss drive range contraction of iconic marine fishes to near extinction.

Authors:  Helen F Yan; Peter M Kyne; Rima W Jabado; Ruth H Leeney; Lindsay N K Davidson; Danielle H Derrick; Brittany Finucci; Robert P Freckleton; Sonja V Fordham; Nicholas K Dulvy
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity.

Authors:  Michael Stat; Jeffrey John; Joseph D DiBattista; Stephen J Newman; Michael Bunce; Euan S Harvey
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 6.560

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-ocean patterns and processes in fish biodiversity on coral reefs through the lens of eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Laetitia Mathon; Virginie Marques; David Mouillot; Camille Albouy; Marco Andrello; Florian Baletaud; Giomar H Borrero-Pérez; Tony Dejean; Graham J Edgar; Jonathan Grondin; Pierre-Edouard Guerin; Régis Hocdé; Jean-Baptiste Juhel; Eva Maire; Gael Mariani; Matthew McLean; Andrea Polanco F; Laurent Pouyaud; Rick D Stuart-Smith; Hagi Yulia Sugeha; Alice Valentini; Laurent Vigliola; Indra B Vimono; Loïc Pellissier; Stéphanie Manel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.

Authors:  Hui-Ting Ruan; Rui-Li Wang; Hong-Ting Li; Li Liu; Tian-Xu Kuang; Min Li; Ke-Shu Zou
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2022-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.