Kevin C Chun1, Ashley S Schmidt1, Sukhmine Bains1, Anthony T Nguyen2, Kiana M Samadzadeh2, Machelle D Wilson3, John H Peters4, Eugene S Lee5. 1. Department of Surgery, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Mather, Calif. 2. Department of Research, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Mather, Calif. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, Calif. 4. Department of Medicine, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Mather, Calif; Department of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, Calif. 5. Department of Surgery, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Mather, Calif; Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, Calif. Electronic address: eugenes.lee@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Surveillance of patients identified with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from an AAA screening program poses a challenge for health systems because of numerous patient follow-ups. This study evaluates the surveillance outcomes of patients identified with small AAA from a large screening program. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients screened for small AAA (3.0-5.4 cm) from 2007 to 2011 was conducted. Patients with small AAA and no previous history of repair were tracked for follow-up using the 2013 RESCAN follow-up guidelines according to aortic diameter (3.0-3.9 cm, 3 years; 4.0-4.4 cm, 2 years; 4.5-5.4 cm, 1 year). Socioeconomic factors that may influence the follow-up rate and all-cause mortality after screening, including marital status, distance to hospital from residence, estimated household income, and employment disability status, were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 568 patients (mean ± standard deviation, 73.4 ± 7.2 years old) with small AAA (3.6 ± 0.6 cm) were analyzed. Patient follow-up rate was 65.1% (n = 370 of 568). Reasons for follow-up failure were lack of the physician's ordering a scan (n = 139; 70.2%), delayed ordering of scans (n = 36; 18.2%), patient no-show (n = 18; 9.1%), or patient death before follow-up (n = 5; 2.5%). Of all patient-specific factors, patients with smaller diameters were unlikely to achieve follow-up scans (P < .001). A significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality was found for patients with no ultrasound follow-up scan (hazard ratio [HR], 0.369; P < .001), assisted living (HR, 0.381; P < .001), older age (HR, 1.04; P = .001), and lower household incomes (HR, 0.989; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up rate of patients with small AAA was poor at 65.1%. The data indicate that socioeconomic factors do not significantly affect follow-up success. Therefore, physician ordering of scans may exert the greatest influence on follow-up rates in patients with small AAA. Automatic ordering of follow-up scans for patients with small AAAs is proposed to improve follow-up rates. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Surveillance of patients identified with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from an AAA screening program poses a challenge for health systems because of numerous patient follow-ups. This study evaluates the surveillance outcomes of patients identified with small AAA from a large screening program. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients screened for small AAA (3.0-5.4 cm) from 2007 to 2011 was conducted. Patients with small AAA and no previous history of repair were tracked for follow-up using the 2013 RESCAN follow-up guidelines according to aortic diameter (3.0-3.9 cm, 3 years; 4.0-4.4 cm, 2 years; 4.5-5.4 cm, 1 year). Socioeconomic factors that may influence the follow-up rate and all-cause mortality after screening, including marital status, distance to hospital from residence, estimated household income, and employment disability status, were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 568 patients (mean ± standard deviation, 73.4 ± 7.2 years old) with small AAA (3.6 ± 0.6 cm) were analyzed. Patient follow-up rate was 65.1% (n = 370 of 568). Reasons for follow-up failure were lack of the physician's ordering a scan (n = 139; 70.2%), delayed ordering of scans (n = 36; 18.2%), patient no-show (n = 18; 9.1%), or patientdeath before follow-up (n = 5; 2.5%). Of all patient-specific factors, patients with smaller diameters were unlikely to achieve follow-up scans (P < .001). A significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality was found for patients with no ultrasound follow-up scan (hazard ratio [HR], 0.369; P < .001), assisted living (HR, 0.381; P < .001), older age (HR, 1.04; P = .001), and lower household incomes (HR, 0.989; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up rate of patients with small AAA was poor at 65.1%. The data indicate that socioeconomic factors do not significantly affect follow-up success. Therefore, physician ordering of scans may exert the greatest influence on follow-up rates in patients with small AAA. Automatic ordering of follow-up scans for patients with small AAAs is proposed to improve follow-up rates. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Elliot L Chaikof; David C Brewster; Ronald L Dalman; Michel S Makaroun; Karl A Illig; Gregorio A Sicard; Carlos H Timaran; Gilbert R Upchurch; Frank J Veith Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Paul E Norman; Konrad Jamrozik; Michael M Lawrence-Brown; Max T Q Le; Carole A Spencer; Raywin J Tuohy; Richard W Parsons; James A Dickinson Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-11-15
Authors: Kevin C Chun; Richard C Anderson; Hunter C Smothers; Kanika Sood; Zachary T Irwin; Machelle D Wilson; Eugene S Lee Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Kevin C Chun; Kelly J Dolan; Hunter C Smothers; Zachary T Irwin; Richard C Anderson; Arlene L Gonzalves; Eugene S Lee Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 4.268