Literature DB >> 22231532

The management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and incidence of rupture.

R S Von Allmen1, J T Powell.   

Abstract

Twenty-five years have passed since the first randomised controlled trial began its recruitment for screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 65 and above. Since this and other randomised trials, all launched in the late 80s and 90s of the last century, the epidemiologic profile of abdominal aortic aneurysm may have changed. The trials reported an AAA prevalence in the range of 4-7% for men aged 65 years or more. AAA-related mortality was significantly improved by screening, and after 13 years, the largest trial showed a benefit for all-cause mortality. Screening also was shown to be cost-effective. Today, there are studies showing a substantial decrease of AAA prevalence to sometimes less than 2% in men aged ≥ 65 years and there is evidence that the incidence of ruptured aneurysm and mortality from AAA is also declining. This decline preceded the implementation of screening programmes but may be due to a change in risk factor management. The prevalence of smoking has decreased and there has been improvement in the control of hypertension and a rising use of statins for cardiovascular risk prevention. Additionally, there is a shift of the burden to the older age group of ≥ 75 years. Such radical changes may influence screening policy and it is worth reflecting on the optimum age of screening - it might be better to screen at ages >65 years - or rescreening 5 to 10 years after the first screen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)        ISSN: 0021-9509            Impact factor:   1.888


  8 in total

1.  Monocytic adhesion molecule expression and monocyte-endothelial cell dysfunction are increased in patients with peripheral vascular disease versus patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Eugene S Lee; Elyse N Van Spyk; Kevin C Chun; Robert L Pitts; Mack H Wu; Sarah Y Yuan
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Surveillance outcomes of small abdominal aortic aneurysms identified from a large screening program.

Authors:  Kevin C Chun; Ashley S Schmidt; Sukhmine Bains; Anthony T Nguyen; Kiana M Samadzadeh; Machelle D Wilson; John H Peters; Eugene S Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Effect of lipid-modifying therapy on long-term mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenwen Zhang; Zhao Liu; Changjian Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Christopher M Huff; Mitchell J Silver; Gary M Ansel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Matrix Metalloproteinase in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Eithne M Maguire; Stuart W A Pearce; Rui Xiao; Aung Y Oo; Qingzhong Xiao
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-06

Review 6.  Extracellular Vesicles, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Akbarshakh Akhmerov; Tanyalak Parimon
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 7.  Molecular imaging of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Aneesh K Ramaswamy; Mark Hamilton; Rucha V Joshi; Benjamin P Kline; Rui Li; Pu Wang; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-04-23

Review 8.  Emergent endovascular vs. open surgery repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chuan Qin; Lin Chen; Ying-bin Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.