Literature DB >> 31708297

Risk of developing an abdominal aortic aneurysm after ectatic aorta detection from initial screening.

Kevin C Chun1, Richard C Anderson1, Hunter C Smothers1, Kanika Sood1, Zachary T Irwin1, Machelle D Wilson2, Eugene S Lee3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance guidelines lack any follow-up recommendations after initial abdominal aortic screening diameter of less than 3.0 cm. Some reports have demonstrated patients with late AAA formation and late ruptures after initial ultrasound screening detection of patients with an aortic diameter of 2.5 to 2.9 cm (ectatic aorta). The purpose of this study was to determine ectatic aorta prevalence, AAA development, rupture risk, and risk factor profile in patients with detected ectatic aortas in a AAA screening program.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients screened for AAA from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, within a regional health care system was conducted. Screening criteria were men 65 to 75 years of age that smoked a minimum of 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. An ectatic aorta was defined as a maximum aortic diameter from 2.5 to 2.9 cm. An AAA was defined as an aortic diameter of 3 cm or greater. Patients screened with ectatic aortas who had subsequent follow-up imaging of the aorta with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were analyzed for associated clinical and cardiovascular risk factors. All data were collected through December 3,/2018. A logistic regression of statistically significant variables from univariate and χ2 analyses were performed to identify risks associated with the development of AAA from an initially diagnosed ectatic aorta. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess survival data. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: From a screening pool of 19,649 patients, 3205 (16.3%) with a mean age of 72.1 ± 5.3 years were identified to have an ectatic aorta from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. The average screening ectatic aortic diameter was 2.6 ± 0.1 cm. There were 672 patients (21.0%) with a mean age of 73.0 ± 5.7 years who received subsequent imaging for other clinical indications and 193 of these patients (28.7%) with ectatic aortas developed an AAA from the last follow-up scan (4.2 ± 2.5 years). The average observation length of all patients was 6.4 ± 2.9 years. No ruptures were reported, but 27.8% of deaths were of unknown cause. One patient had aortic growth to 5.5 cm or greater (0.15%). Larger initial screening diameter (P < .01), presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), and active smoking (P = .01) were associated with AAA development.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diagnosed ectatic aortas from screening who are active smokers or have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are likely to develop an AAA. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAA; AAA screening; Ectatic aorta

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708297      PMCID: PMC7203000          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  22 in total

1.  Ten great public health achievements--United States, 2001-2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Outcomes of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program.

Authors:  Kevin C Chun; Kai Y Teng; Elyse N Van Spyk; John G Carson; Eugene S Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Anders Wanhainen; Jonas Lundkvist; David Bergqvist; Martin Björck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Craig Fleming; Evelyn P Whitlock; Tracy L Beil; Frank A Lederle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Editor's choice: five-year outcomes in men screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm at 65 years of age: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  S Svensjö; M Björck; A Wanhainen
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Risk factors associated with the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients screened at a regional Veterans Affairs health care system.

Authors:  Kevin C Chun; Kai Y Teng; LeAnn A Chavez; Elyse N Van Spyk; Kiana M Samadzadeh; John G Carson; Eugene S Lee
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 7.  Potential benefits and harms of offering ultrasound surveillance to men aged 65 years and older with a subaneurysmal (2.5-2.9 cm) infrarenal aorta.

Authors:  Candyce Hamel; Mona Ghannad; Matthew D F McInnes; John Marshall; Jonothan Earnshaw; Roxanne Ward; Becky Skidmore; Chantelle Garritty
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act.

Authors:  Eugene S Lee; Elizabeth Pickett; Nasim Hedayati; David L Dawson; William C Pevec
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  A multicentre observational study of the outcomes of screening detected sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation.

Authors:  J B Wild; P W Stather; F Biancari; E C Choke; J J Earnshaw; S W Grant; H Hafez; R Holdsworth; T Juvonen; J Lindholt; C McCollum; S Parvin; R D Sayers; M J Bown
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  H A Ashton; L Gao; L G Kim; P S Druce; S G Thompson; R A P Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Abdominal aortic diameter and cardiovascular status in patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Authors:  H H S Kharagjitsing; J van Vooren; E G Brilman; T R Hendriksz; T van Gelder; E F H van Bommel
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.631

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.