Literature DB >> 23443444

Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Matthew J Bown, Michael J Sweeting, Louise C Brown, Janet T Powell, Simon G Thompson.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs [3.0 cm-5.4 cm in diameter]) are monitored by ultrasound surveillance. The intervals between surveillance scans should be chosen to detect an expanding aneurysm prior to rupture.
OBJECTIVE: To limit risk of aneurysm rupture or excessive growth by optimizing ultrasound surveillance intervals. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Individual patient data from studies of small AAA growth and rupture were assessed. Studies were identified for inclusion through a systematic literature search through December 2010. Study authors were contacted, which yielded 18 data sets providing repeated ultrasound measurements of AAA diameter over time in 15,471 patients. DATA EXTRACTION: AAA diameters were analyzed using a random-effects model that allowed for between-patient variability in size and growth rate. Rupture rates were analyzed by proportional hazards regression using the modeled AAA diameter as a time-varying covariate. Predictions of the risks of exceeding 5.5-cm diameter and of rupture within given time intervals were estimated and pooled across studies by random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS: AAA growth and rupture rates varied considerably across studies. For each 0.5-cm increase in AAA diameter, growth rates increased on average by 0.59 mm per year (95% CI, 0.51-0.66) and rupture rates increased by a factor of 1.91 (95% CI, 1.61-2.25). For example, to control the AAA growth risk in men of exceeding 5.5 cm to below 10%, on average, a 7.4-year surveillance interval (95% CI, 6.7-8.1) is sufficient for a 3.0-cm AAA, while an 8-month interval (95% CI, 7-10) is necessary for a 5.0-cm AAA. To control the risk of rupture in men to below 1%, the corresponding estimated surveillance intervals are 8.5 years (95% CI, 7.0-10.5) and 17 months (95% CI, 14-22). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In contrast to the commonly adopted surveillance intervals in current AAA screening programs, surveillance intervals of several years may be clinically acceptable for the majority of patients with small AAA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23443444     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  37 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Evan J Zucker; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

2.  Association of carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness with abdominal aortic aneurysm: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Lu Yao; Aaron R Folsom; Alvaro Alonso; Pamela L Lutsey; James S Pankow; Weihua Guan; Susan Cheng; Frank A Lederle; Weihong Tang
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Surveillance outcomes of small abdominal aortic aneurysms identified from a large screening program.

Authors:  Kevin C Chun; Ashley S Schmidt; Sukhmine Bains; Anthony T Nguyen; Kiana M Samadzadeh; Machelle D Wilson; John H Peters; Eugene S Lee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Andrographolide Ameliorates Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression by Inhibiting Inflammatory Cell Infiltration through Downregulation of Cytokine and Integrin Expression.

Authors:  Jun Ren; Zhenjie Liu; Qiwei Wang; Jasmine Giles; Jason Greenberg; Nader Sheibani; K Craig Kent; Bo Liu
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Emergence of molecular imaging of aortic aneurysm: implications for risk stratification and management.

Authors:  Reza Golestani; Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Contrast inhomogeneity in CT angiography of the abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Ayaz Aghayev; Saurabh Rohatgi; Amir Imanzadeh; Antonios P Antoniadis; Kanako K Kumamaru; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Ruth Dunne; Michael Steigner; Michael Hanley; Edwin C Gravereaux; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-12-02

7.  Imaging vessel wall biology to predict outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Reza Golestani; Mahmoud Razavian; Lei Nie; Jiasheng Zhang; Jae-Joon Jung; Yunpeng Ye; Michelle de Roo; Koen Hilgerink; Chi Liu; Simon P Robinson; Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Prognostic value of D-dimer and markers of coagulation for stratification of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth.

Authors:  Alexandra C Sundermann; Keith Saum; Kelsey A Conrad; Hannah M Russell; Todd L Edwards; Kevin Mani; Martin Björck; Anders Wanhainen; A Phillip Owens
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

9.  Modeling the Growth of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Marc A Bailey; Paul D Baxter; Tao Jiang; Aimee M Charnell; Kathryn J Griffin; Anne B Johnson; Katherine I Bridge; Soroush Sohrabi; D Julian A Scott
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Maximum Diameter of Native Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Measured by Angio-Computed Tomography: Reproducibility and Lack of Consensus Impacts on Clinical Decisions.

Authors:  Caroline E Mora; Claude D Marcus; Coralie M Barbe; Fiona B Ecarnot; Anne L Long
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2015-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.