Literature DB >> 26473349

An Effective and Reproducible Model of Ventricular Fibrillation in Crossbred Yorkshire Swine (Sus scrofa) for Use in Physiologic Research.

James M Burgert1, Arthur D Johnson2, Jose C Garcia-Blanco3, W John Craig4, Joseph C O'Sullivan4.   

Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical induction (TCEI) has been used to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF) in laboratory swine for physiologic and resuscitation research. Many studies do not describe the method of TCEI in detail, thus making replication by future investigators difficult. Here we describe a detailed method of electrically inducing VF that was used successfully in a prospective, experimental resuscitation study. Specifically, an electrical current was passed through the heart to induce VF in crossbred Yorkshire swine (n = 30); the current was generated by using two 22-gauge spinal needles, with one placed above and one below the heart, and three 9V batteries connected in series. VF developed in 28 of the 30 pigs (93%) within 10 s of beginning the procedure. In the remaining 2 swine, VF was induced successfully after medial redirection of the superior parasternal needle. The TCEI method is simple, reproducible, and cost-effective. TCEI may be especially valuable to researchers with limited access to funding, sophisticated equipment, or colleagues experienced in interventional cardiology techniques. The TCEI method might be most appropriate for pharmacologic studies requiring VF, VF resulting from the R-on-T phenomenon (as in prolonged QT syndrome), and VF arising from other ectopic or reentrant causes. However, the TCEI method does not accurately model the most common cause of VF, acute coronary occlusive disease. Researchers must consider the limitations of TCEI that may affect internal and external validity of collected data, when designing experiments using this model of VF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26473349      PMCID: PMC4617336     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  16 in total

1.  Plasma epinephrine concentrations after intraosseous and central venous injection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the lamb.

Authors:  D B Andropoulos; S J Soifer; M D Schreiber
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  A comparison of electrically induced cardiac arrest with cardiac arrest produced by coronary occlusion.

Authors:  Jinglan Wang; Max Harry Weil; Wanchun Tang; Yun-Te Chang; Lei Huang
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Repeated administration of vasopressin but not epinephrine maintains coronary perfusion pressure after early and late administration during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

Authors:  V Wenzel; K H Lindner; A C Krismer; E A Miller; W G Voelckel; W Lingnau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Neither vasopressin nor amiodarone improve CPR outcome in an animal model of hypothermic cardiac arrest.

Authors:  B Schwarz; P Mair; H Wagner-Berger; K H Stadlbauer; S Girg; V Wenzel; K H Lindner
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  A model of ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation for comparison of fixed-dose and escalating-dose defibrillation strategies.

Authors:  James T Niemann; John P Rosborough; Robert G Walker
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation in Landrace/Large White swine: a research model.

Authors:  T Xanthos; P Lelovas; I Vlachos; N Tsirikos-Karapanos; E Kouskouni; D Perrea; I Dontas
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Myocardial performance index following electrically induced or ischemically induced cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Tingyan Xu; Wanchun Tang; Giuseppe Ristagno; Shijie Sun; Max Harry Weil
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  An experimental model of sudden death due to low-energy chest-wall impact (commotio cordis)

Authors:  M S Link; P J Wang; N G Pandian; S Bharati; J E Udelson; M Y Lee; M A Vecchiotti; B A VanderBrink; G Mirra; B J Maron; N A Estes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Complications associated with defibrillation threshold testing: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  David Birnie; Stanley Tung; Christopher Simpson; Eugene Crystal; Derek Exner; Felix-Alejandro Ayala Paredes; Andrew Krahn; Ratika Parkash; Yaariv Khaykin; Francois Philippon; Peter Guerra; Shane Kimber; Douglas Cameron; Jeffrey S Healey
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Is all ventricular fibrillation the same? A comparison of ischemically induced with electrically induced ventricular fibrillation in a porcine cardiac arrest and resuscitation model.

Authors:  James T Niemann; John P Rosborough; Scott Youngquist; Jay Thomas; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  2 in total

1.  [A new method for establishing a ventricular fibrillation model by TCEI in Tibetan miniature pig].

Authors:  Guodong Liang; Rugang Zheng; Hongjian Jian; Minhai Zhang; Huiqiong Yuan; Jiemin Hong; Gang Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-11-30

2.  Effects of humeral intraosseous epinephrine in a pediatric hypovolemic cardiac arrest porcine model.

Authors:  Michael James Neill; James M Burgert; Dawn Blouin; Benjamin Tigges; Kari Rodden; Rachel Roberts; Phillip Anderson; Travis Hallquist; John Navarro; Joseph O'Sullivan; Don Johnson
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2020-02-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.