Literature DB >> 10077524

Repeated administration of vasopressin but not epinephrine maintains coronary perfusion pressure after early and late administration during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

V Wenzel1, K H Lindner, A C Krismer, E A Miller, W G Voelckel, W Lingnau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether repeated dosages of vasopressin or epinephrine given early or late during basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be able to increase coronary perfusion pressure above a threshold between 20 and 30 mm Hg that renders defibrillation successful. METHODS AND
RESULTS: After 4 minutes of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 minutes of basic life support CPR, 12 animals were randomly assigned to receive, every 5 minutes, either vasopressin (early vasopressin: 0.4, 0.4, and 0.8 U/kg, respectively; n=6) or epinephrine (early epinephrine: 45, 45, and 200 microg/kg, respectively; n=6). Another 12 animals were randomly allocated after 4 minutes of cardiac arrest, followed by 8 minutes of basic life support CPR, to receive, every 5 minutes, either vasopressin (late vasopressin: 0.4 and 0.8 U/kg, respectively; n=6), or epinephrine (late epinephrine: 45 and 200 microg/kg, respectively; n=6). Defibrillation was attempted after 22 minutes of cardiac arrest. Mean+/-SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher 90 seconds after early vasopressin compared with early epinephrine (50+/-4 versus 34+/-3 mm Hg, P<0.02; 42+/-5 versus 15+/-3 mm Hg, P<0.0008; and 37+/-5 versus 11+/-3 mm Hg, P<0. 002, respectively). Mean+/-SEM coronary perfusion pressure was significantly higher 90 seconds after late vasopressin compared with late epinephrine (40+/-3 versus 22+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.004, and 32+/-4 versus 15+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.01, respectively). All vasopressin animals survived 60 minutes, whereas no epinephrine pig had return of spontaneous circulation (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated administration of vasopressin but only the first epinephrine dose given early and late during basic life support CPR maintained coronary perfusion pressure above the threshold that is needed for successful defibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10077524     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.10.1379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  20 in total

1.  Experimental cardiac arrest treatment with adrenaline, vasopressin, or placebo.

Authors:  Manoel Ângelo Gomes Palácio; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo; Ari Timerman
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Cerebral effects of resuscitation with either epinephrine or vasopressin in an animal model of hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Jan Küchler; Stephan Klaus; Ludger Bahlmann; Nils Onken; Alexander Keck; Emma Smith; Jan Gliemroth; Claudia Ditz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  An Effective and Reproducible Model of Ventricular Fibrillation in Crossbred Yorkshire Swine (Sus scrofa) for Use in Physiologic Research.

Authors:  James M Burgert; Arthur D Johnson; Jose C Garcia-Blanco; W John Craig; Joseph C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 4.  Modeling cardiac arrest and resuscitation in the domestic pig.

Authors:  Brandon H Cherry; Anh Q Nguyen; Roger A Hollrah; Albert H Olivencia-Yurvati; Robert T Mallet
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02-04

5.  [A new method for establishing a ventricular fibrillation model by TCEI in Tibetan miniature pig].

Authors:  Guodong Liang; Rugang Zheng; Hongjian Jian; Minhai Zhang; Huiqiong Yuan; Jiemin Hong; Gang Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-11-30

6.  Terlipressin versus adrenaline in an infant animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jesús López-Herce; Bárbara Fernández; Javier Urbano; Santiago Mencía; Maria J Solana; Jimena del Castillo; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Jose M Bellón
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Vasopressin treatment of verapamil toxicity in the porcine model.

Authors:  J Dave Barry; Dave Durkovich; Lee Cantrell; William Richardson; Tri Tong; Steve Offerman; Richard F Clark; David A Tanen; Saralyn Williams
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2005-12

Review 8.  Drug administration in animal studies of cardiac arrest does not reflect human clinical experience.

Authors:  Joshua C Reynolds; Jon C Rittenberger; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Development and Feasibility of a Porcine Model of Amlodipine Toxicity.

Authors:  Sean P Boley; Rebecca B Mackenzie; Jenna M LeRoy; Kristin M Engebretsen; Samuel J Stellpflug
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2019-08-05

10.  The physiologic response to rescue therapy with vasopressin versus epinephrine during experimental pediatric cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Julia C Slovis; Ryan W Morgan; William P Landis; Anna L Roberts; Alexandra M Marquez; Constantine D Mavroudis; Yuxi Lin; Tiffany Ko; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Todd J Kilbaugh
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.