Literature DB >> 17134815

A comparison of electrically induced cardiac arrest with cardiac arrest produced by coronary occlusion.

Jinglan Wang1, Max Harry Weil, Wanchun Tang, Yun-Te Chang, Lei Huang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to compare an animal model of electrically induced VF with ischemically induced VF. In a preponderance of models of cardiac arrest and resuscitation in intact animals, ventricular fibrillation (VF) is induced by an alternating current delivered directly to the epicardium or endocardium. Yet, the applicability of such animal models has been challenged for it is not an electrical current alone but rather a current generated in the ischemic myocardium that triggers VF. Accordingly, a potentially more clinically relevant model was investigated in which spontaneous VF followed acute myocardial ischemia.
METHODS: Twenty anesthetized pigs were randomized to either electrical fibrillation or myocardial ischemia following transient occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery.
RESULTS: VF was untreated for 7 min in both models after which mechanical ventilation and precordial compression were begun. Defibrillation was attempted after 5 min of CPR in both groups. VF appeared within 5.7+/-2.0 min of LAD occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in the number of post-resuscitation premature ventricular beats and recurrent VF followed ROSC and a significantly greater number of shocks was required for restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after LAD occlusion. Nevertheless, early post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction, neurological recovery and 72 h survival were indistinguishable between the two models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17134815     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  8 in total

1.  An Effective and Reproducible Model of Ventricular Fibrillation in Crossbred Yorkshire Swine (Sus scrofa) for Use in Physiologic Research.

Authors:  James M Burgert; Arthur D Johnson; Jose C Garcia-Blanco; W John Craig; Joseph C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 2.  Modeling cardiac arrest and resuscitation in the domestic pig.

Authors:  Brandon H Cherry; Anh Q Nguyen; Roger A Hollrah; Albert H Olivencia-Yurvati; Robert T Mallet
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02-04

3.  [A new method for establishing a ventricular fibrillation model by TCEI in Tibetan miniature pig].

Authors:  Guodong Liang; Rugang Zheng; Hongjian Jian; Minhai Zhang; Huiqiong Yuan; Jiemin Hong; Gang Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-11-30

4.  Transthoracic defibrillation potential gradients in a closed chest porcine model of prolonged spontaneous and electrically induced ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  James T Niemann; John P Rosborough; Scott T Youngquist; Atman P Shah
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  The proinflammatory cytokine response following resuscitation in the swine model depends on the method of ventricular fibrillation induction.

Authors:  James T Niemann; John Rosborough; Scott Youngquist; Roger J Lewis; Quynh T Phan; Scott Filler
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Mapping ventricular fibrillation: a simplified experimental model leads to a complicated result.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  A comprehensive neuromonitoring approach in a large animal model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Filippo Annoni; Lorenzo Peluso; Lucas Akira Hirai; Giovanni Babini; Amina Khaldi; Antoine Herpain; Lorenzo Pitisci; Lorenzo Ferlini; Bruno Garcia; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Jacques Creteur; Fuhong Su
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2022-01-28

8.  Cardiac Arrest in Pigs With 48 hours of Post-Resuscitation Care Induced by 2 Methods of Myocardial Infarction: A Methodological Description.

Authors:  Lauge Vammen; Cecilie Munch Johannsen; Andreas Magnussen; Amalie Povlsen; Søren Riis Petersen; Arezo Azizi; Bo Løfgren; Lars W Andersen; Asger Granfeldt
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.106

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.