Literature DB >> 26463872

Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing.

Randall D Wolcott1, John D Hanson2, Eric J Rees2, Lawrence D Koenig2, Caleb D Phillips2, Richard A Wolcott2,3, Stephen B Cox2, Jennifer S White3.   

Abstract

The extent to which microorganisms impair wound healing is an ongoing controversy in the management of chronic wounds. Because the high diversity and extreme variability of the microbiota between individual chronic wounds lead to inconsistent findings in small cohort studies, evaluation of a large number of chronic wounds using identical sequencing and bioinformatics methods is necessary for clinicians to be able to select appropriate empiric therapies. In this study, we utilized 16S rDNA pyrosequencing to analyze the composition of the bacterial communities present in samples obtained from patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers (N = 910), venous leg ulcers (N = 916), decubitus ulcers (N = 767), and nonhealing surgical wounds (N = 370). The wound samples contained a high proportion of Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas species in 63 and 25% of all wounds, respectively; however, a high prevalence of anaerobic bacteria and bacteria traditionally considered commensalistic was also observed. Our results suggest that neither patient demographics nor wound type influenced the bacterial composition of the chronic wound microbiome. Collectively, these findings indicate that empiric antibiotic selection need not be based on nor altered for wound type. Furthermore, the results provide a much clearer understanding of chronic wound microbiota in general; clinical application of this new knowledge over time may help in its translation to improved wound healing outcomes.
© 2015 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26463872     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  85 in total

1.  [Wound healing in the elderly].

Authors:  S A Eming; M Wlaschek; K Scharffetter-Kochanek
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Lowering the Barriers to Routine Whole-Genome Sequencing of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Daniel D Rhoads
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Microbial Community Distribution and Core Microbiome in Successive Wound Grades of Individuals with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Apoorva Jnana; Vigneshwaran Muthuraman; Vinay Koshy Varghese; Sanjiban Chakrabarty; Thokur Sreepathy Murali; Lingadakai Ramachandra; Kallya Rajgopal Shenoy; Gabriel Sunil Rodrigues; Seetharam Shiva Prasad; Dhananjaya Dendukuri; Andreas Morschhauser; Joerg Nestler; Harald Peter; Frank F Bier; Kapaettu Satyamoorthy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms in Wounds.

Authors:  Derek Fleming; Laura Chahin; Kendra Rumbaugh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A tractable, simplified ex vivo human skin model of wound infection.

Authors:  Daniel J Yoon; Daniel R Fregoso; Duc Nguyen; Vivien Chen; Natasa Strbo; Jaime J Fuentes; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Robert Crawford; Irena Pastar; R Rivkah Isseroff
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Treatment with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Glycoside Hydrolase PslG Combats Wound Infection by Improving Antibiotic Efficacy and Host Innate Immune Activity.

Authors:  Matthew J Pestrak; Perrin Baker; Sheri Dellos-Nolan; Preston J Hill; Daniel Passos da Silva; Holly Silver; Ira Lacdao; Deepa Raju; Matthew R Parsek; Daniel J Wozniak; P Lynne Howell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Metabolic modelling of chronic wound microbiota predicts mutualistic interactions that drive community composition.

Authors:  P Phalak; M A Henson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Temporal Stability in Chronic Wound Microbiota Is Associated With Poor Healing.

Authors:  Michael Loesche; Sue E Gardner; Lindsay Kalan; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Brendan P Hodkinson; Amanda S Tyldsley; Carrie L Franciscus; Stephen L Hillis; Samir Mehta; David J Margolis; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 9.  Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis: Bone, Bugs, and Surgery.

Authors:  Kenneth L Urish; James E Cassat
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Electrochemical detection of Pseudomonas in wound exudate samples from patients with chronic wounds.

Authors:  Hunter J Sismaet; Anirban Banerjee; Sean McNish; Yongwook Choi; Manolito Torralba; Sarah Lucas; Agnes Chan; Victoria K Shanmugam; Edgar D Goluch
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 3.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.