P Phalak1, M A Henson1. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Institute for Applied Life Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To identify putative mutualistic interactions driving community composition in polymicrobial chronic wound infections using metabolic modelling. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a 12 species metabolic model that covered 74% of 16S rDNA pyrosequencing reads of dominant genera from 2963 chronic wound patients. The community model was used to predict species abundances averaged across this large patient population. We found that substantially improved predictions were obtained when the model was constrained with genera prevalence data and predicted abundances were averaged over 5000 ensemble simulations with community participants randomly determined according to the experimentally determined prevalences. Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predicted to exhibit a strong mutualistic relationship that resulted in community growth rate and diversity simultaneously increasing, suggesting that these two common chronic wound pathogens establish dominance by cooperating with less harmful commensal species. In communities lacking one or both dominant pathogens, other mutualistic relationship including Staphylococcus/Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas/Serratia and Streptococcus/Enterococcus were predicted consistent with published experimental data. CONCLUSIONS: Mutualistic interactions were predicted to be driven by crossfeeding of organic acids, alcohols and amino acids that could potentially be disrupted to slow chronic wound disease progression. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Approximately 2% of the US population suffers from nonhealing chronic wounds infected by a combination of commensal and pathogenic bacteria. These polymicrobial infections are often resilient to antibiotic treatment due to the nutrient-rich wound environment and species interactions that promote community stability and robustness. The simulation results from this study were used to identify putative mutualistic interactions between bacteria that could be targeted to enhance treatment efficacy.
AIMS: To identify putative mutualistic interactions driving community composition in polymicrobial chronic wound infections using metabolic modelling. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a 12 species metabolic model that covered 74% of 16S rDNA pyrosequencing reads of dominant genera from 2963 chronic wound patients. The community model was used to predict species abundances averaged across this large patient population. We found that substantially improved predictions were obtained when the model was constrained with genera prevalence data and predicted abundances were averaged over 5000 ensemble simulations with community participants randomly determined according to the experimentally determined prevalences. Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predicted to exhibit a strong mutualistic relationship that resulted in community growth rate and diversity simultaneously increasing, suggesting that these two common chronic wound pathogens establish dominance by cooperating with less harmful commensal species. In communities lacking one or both dominant pathogens, other mutualistic relationship including Staphylococcus/Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas/Serratia and Streptococcus/Enterococcus were predicted consistent with published experimental data. CONCLUSIONS: Mutualistic interactions were predicted to be driven by crossfeeding of organic acids, alcohols and amino acids that could potentially be disrupted to slow chronic wound disease progression. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Approximately 2% of the US population suffers from nonhealing chronic wounds infected by a combination of commensal and pathogenic bacteria. These polymicrobial infections are often resilient to antibiotic treatment due to the nutrient-rich wound environment and species interactions that promote community stability and robustness. The simulation results from this study were used to identify putative mutualistic interactions between bacteria that could be targeted to enhance treatment efficacy.
Authors: Stefanía Magnúsdóttir; Almut Heinken; Laura Kutt; Dmitry A Ravcheev; Eugen Bauer; Alberto Noronha; Kacy Greenhalgh; Christian Jäger; Joanna Baginska; Paul Wilmes; Ronan M T Fleming; Ines Thiele Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: L Guariguata; D R Whiting; I Hambleton; J Beagley; U Linnenkamp; J E Shaw Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Klaus Kirketerp-Møller; Peter Ø Jensen; Mustafa Fazli; Kit G Madsen; Jette Pedersen; Claus Moser; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Niels Høiby; Michael Givskov; Thomas Bjarnsholt Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Benjamin A R N Durand; Cassandra Pouget; Chloé Magnan; Virginie Molle; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Catherine Dunyach-Remy Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2022-07-25