Literature DB >> 26462480

Higher response with bone mineral density increase with monthly injectable ibandronate 1 mg compared with oral risedronate in the MOVER study.

Tetsuo Nakano1, Masao Yamamoto2, Junko Hashimoto3, Masato Tobinai4, Seitaro Yoshida4, Toshitaka Nakamura5.   

Abstract

We examined response to bone mineral density (BMD) gains in the MOVER study following treatment with intravenous (IV) ibandronate 1 mg/month, and investigated the characteristics of a non-responder group. At 1 year, responder rates for patients with BMD increases >0 % were similar with IV ibandronate 0.5 or 1 mg/month and oral risedronate 2.5 mg/day. However, after 3 years, responder rates with BMD increases ≥3 % were highest with ibandronate 1 mg at all bone sites (>80 % at the lumbar spine [L2-L4] and >50 % at all femur sites, which was significantly higher than with risedronate). Non-responders were defined by BMD increases ≤3 % at L2-L4 or ≤0 % at total hip, and ≤50 % reduction in creatinine-corrected urinary collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide (uCTX) from baseline to 1 year. There were a small number of non-responders in the ibandronate 1 mg group: 3.3 % (10/299) with ≤0 % total hip BMD increase and ≤50 % uCTX reduction from baseline. These non-responders had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels than responders, but no differences in kidney function, L2-L4 BMD or bone turnover marker baseline values. Throughout the study, non-responders failed to show any increases in BMD. Our analysis demonstrates significantly higher responder rates with IV ibandronate 1 mg/month than with risedronate at 3 years. A small number of non-responders in the ibandronate group had lower 25(OH)D baseline levels than responders, suggesting that 25(OH)D levels could be a useful indicator of BMD response to therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ibandronate; Intravenous; MOVER study; Osteoporosis; Responders

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26462480     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-015-0717-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  13 in total

1.  Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: one-year results from the dosing intravenous administration study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Silvano Adami; Cezary Strugala; Jacob A Stakkestad; Jean-Yves Reginster; Dieter Felsenberg; Claus Christiansen; Roberto Civitelli; Marc K Drezner; Robert R Recker; Michael Bolognese; Claire Hughes; Daiva Masanauskaite; Penelope Ward; Philip Sambrook; David M Reid
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-06

2.  Ibandronate for the prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  A Cranney; G A Wells; E Yetisir; S Adami; C Cooper; P D Delmas; P D Miller; S Papapoulos; J-Y Reginster; P N Sambrook; S Silverman; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Ibandronate dose response is associated with increases in bone mineral density and reductions in clinical fractures: results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony I Sebba; Ronald D Emkey; Joseph D Kohles; Philip N Sambrook
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut; Arne Skag; Claus Christiansen; Robert Recker; Jacob A Stakkestad; Arne Hoiseth; Dieter Felsenberg; Hermann Huss; Jennifer Gilbride; Ralph C Schimmer; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Long-term fracture rates seen with continued ibandronate treatment: pooled analysis of DIVA and MOBILE long-term extension studies.

Authors:  P D Miller; R R Recker; S Harris; S Silverman; D Felsenberg; J Reginster; B-M Day; C Barr; D Masanauskaite
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study.

Authors:  John A Eisman; Roberto Civitelli; Silvano Adami; Edward Czerwinski; Chris Recknor; Richard Prince; Jean-Yves Reginster; Mone Zaidi; Dieter Felsenberg; Claire Hughes; Nicole Mairon; Daiva Masanauskaite; David M Reid; Pierre D Delmas; Robert R Recker
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study.

Authors:  J-Y Reginster; S Adami; P Lakatos; M Greenwald; J J Stepan; S L Silverman; C Christiansen; L Rowell; N Mairon; B Bonvoisin; M K Drezner; R Emkey; D Felsenberg; C Cooper; P D Delmas; P D Miller
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Increased bone mineral density with monthly intravenous ibandronate contributes to fracture risk reduction in patients with primary osteoporosis: three-year analysis of the MOVER study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Seitaro Yoshida; Junko Hashimoto; Masayuki Matsunaga; Masato Tobinai; Toshitaka Nakamura
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and vertebral fracture risk associated with risedronate: greater increases in bone mineral density do not relate to greater decreases in fracture risk.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; Cyrus Cooper; Robert Lindsay; Richard Eastell; Michael D Manhart; Ian P Barton; Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Clinical efficacy on fracture risk and safety of 0.5 mg or 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate versus 2.5 mg/day oral risedronate in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Toshitaka Nakamura; Tetsuo Nakano; Masako Ito; Hiroshi Hagino; Junko Hashimoto; Masato Tobinai; Hideki Mizunuma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  6 in total

1.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Ibandronate: A Review in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Effectiveness of monthly intravenous ibandronate on the low responders to oral bisphosphonate: the MOVEMENT study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Akinori Sakai; Satoshi Ikeda; Yasuo Imanishi; Hiroshi Tsurukami; Satoru Nakajo; Naohisa Miyakoshi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Monthly oral ibandronate 100 mg is as effective as monthly intravenous ibandronate 1 mg in patients with various pathologies in the MOVEST study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Masako Ito; Junko Hashimoto; Masao Yamamoto; Koichi Endo; Kyoko Katsumata; Yoshihiro Asao; Rumiko Matsumoto; Tetsuo Nakano; Hideki Mizunuma; Toshitaka Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A prospective comparative study of intravenous alendronate and ibandronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Horikawa; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Michio Hongo; Yuji Kasukawa; Hiroyuki Kodama; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Bone Mineral Density After Transitioning From Denosumab to Alendronate.

Authors:  David Kendler; Arkadi Chines; Patricia Clark; Peter R Ebeling; Michael McClung; Yumie Rhee; Shuang Huang; Robert Kees Stad
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.