BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. METHODS: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. METHODS: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes.
Authors: J Reginster; H W Minne; O H Sorensen; M Hooper; C Roux; M L Brandi; B Lund; D Ethgen; S Pack; I Roumagnac; R Eastell Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2000 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Marc C Hochberg; Susan Greenspan; Richard D Wasnich; Paul Miller; Desmond E Thompson; Philip D Ross Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Henry G Bone; David Hosking; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Joseph R Tucci; Ronald D Emkey; Richard P Tonino; Jose Adolfo Rodriguez-Portales; Robert W Downs; Jayanti Gupta; Arthur C Santora; Uri A Liberman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrick Garnero; Dennis Mulleman; Francoise Munoz; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Pierre D Delmas Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: P D Miller; R R Recker; J-Y Reginster; B J Riis; E Czerwinski; D Masanauskaite; A Kenwright; R Lorenc; J A Stakkestad; P Lakatos Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: N Binkley; S L Silverman; C Simonelli; N Santiago; J D Kohles; G Dasic; J A Sunyecz Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: A Cranney; G A Wells; E Yetisir; S Adami; C Cooper; P D Delmas; P D Miller; S Papapoulos; J-Y Reginster; P N Sambrook; S Silverman; E Siris; J D Adachi Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 4.507