| Literature DB >> 28389932 |
Hiroshi Hagino1, Masako Ito2, Junko Hashimoto3, Masao Yamamoto4, Koichi Endo4, Kyoko Katsumata4, Yoshihiro Asao4, Rumiko Matsumoto5, Tetsuo Nakano6, Hideki Mizunuma7, Toshitaka Nakamura8.
Abstract
The non-inferiority of oral ibandronate 100 mg to intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate 1 mg in increasing lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months of treatment was demonstrated in the randomized, phase III MOVEST study. We conducted subgroup analyses in the per-protocol set of the study (n = 183 oral ibandronate; n = 189 i.v. ibandronate). In patients with LS BMD T score ≥ -3.0 or < -3.0 at screening, LS BMD gains from baseline were 4.42 and 5.79%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 4.60 and 5.83%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. LS BMD gains in patients with or without prevalent vertebral fractures were 5.21 and 5.23%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 5.01 and 5.49%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. In patients aged <75 or ≥75 years, LS BMD gains were 5.46 and 4.51%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 5.25 and 5.77%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. LS BMD gains in patients with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≥20 or <20 ng/mL were 5.35 and 4.76%, respectively, with oral ibandronate, and 5.05 and 6.57%, respectively, with i.v. ibandronate. Similar results were obtained in patients with or without prior bisphosphonate (BP) treatment, and in those receiving osteoporosis drug treatment other than BPs. In conclusion, oral ibandronate 100 mg demonstrated comparable BMD gains with monthly i.v. ibandronate, and thus shows high utility in the lifestyle and disease conditions associated with osteoporosis in Japanese patients.Entities:
Keywords: Ibandronate; Intravenous; MOVEST study; Oral
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28389932 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-017-0839-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bone Miner Metab ISSN: 0914-8779 Impact factor: 2.626