M W Aref1, E M B McNerny1, D Brown1, K J Jepsen2, M R Allen3,4. 1. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, MS 5035, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, MS 5035, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. matallen@iupui.edu. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. matallen@iupui.edu.
Abstract
Two strains of mice with distinct bone morphologies and mechanical properties were treated with zoledronate. Our results show a different response to drug treatment in the two strains providing evidence that baseline properties of structure/material may influence response to zoledronate. INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonates are highly effective in reducing fracture risk, yet some individuals treated with these agents still experience fracture. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that genotype influences the effect of zoledronate on bone mechanical properties. METHODS: Skeletally mature male mice from genetic backgrounds known to have distinct baseline post-yield properties (C57/B6, high post-yield displacement; A/J, low post-yield displacement) were treated for 8 weeks with saline (VEH) or zoledronate (ZOL, 0.06 mg/kg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks) in a 2 × 2 study design. Ex vivo μCT and mechanical testing (4-pt bending) were conducted on the femur to assess morphological and mechanical differences. RESULTS: Significant drug and/or genotype effects were found for several mechanical properties and significant drug × genotype interactions were found for measures of strength (ultimate force) and brittleness (total displacement, strain to failure). Treatment with ZOL affected bone biomechanical measures of brittleness (total displacement (-25 %) and strain to failure (-23 %)) in B6 mice significantly differently than in A/J mice. This was driven by unique drug × genotype effects on bone geometry in B6 animals yet likely also reflected changes to the tissue properties. CONCLUSION: These data may support the concept that properties of the bone geometry and/or tissue at the time of treatment initiation play a role in determining the bone's mechanical response to zoledronate treatment.
Two strains of mice with distinct bone morphologies and mechanical properties were treated with zoledronate. Our results show a different response to drug treatment in the two strains providing evidence that baseline properties of structure/material may influence response to zoledronate. INTRODUCTION:Bisphosphonates are highly effective in reducing fracture risk, yet some individuals treated with these agents still experience fracture. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that genotype influences the effect of zoledronate on bone mechanical properties. METHODS: Skeletally mature male mice from genetic backgrounds known to have distinct baseline post-yield properties (C57/B6, high post-yield displacement; A/J, low post-yield displacement) were treated for 8 weeks with saline (VEH) or zoledronate (ZOL, 0.06 mg/kg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks) in a 2 × 2 study design. Ex vivo μCT and mechanical testing (4-pt bending) were conducted on the femur to assess morphological and mechanical differences. RESULTS: Significant drug and/or genotype effects were found for several mechanical properties and significant drug × genotype interactions were found for measures of strength (ultimate force) and brittleness (total displacement, strain to failure). Treatment with ZOL affected bone biomechanical measures of brittleness (total displacement (-25 %) and strain to failure (-23 %)) in B6 mice significantly differently than in A/J mice. This was driven by unique drug × genotype effects on bone geometry in B6 animals yet likely also reflected changes to the tissue properties. CONCLUSION: These data may support the concept that properties of the bone geometry and/or tissue at the time of treatment initiation play a role in determining the bone's mechanical response to zoledronate treatment.
Authors: Christopher Price; Brad C Herman; Thomas Lufkin; Haviva M Goldman; Karl J Jepsen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Dennis M Black; Pierre D Delmas; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Steven Boonen; Jane A Cauley; Felicia Cosman; Péter Lakatos; Ping Chung Leung; Zulema Man; Carlos Mautalen; Peter Mesenbrink; Huilin Hu; John Caminis; Karen Tong; Theresa Rosario-Jansen; Joel Krasnow; Trisha F Hue; Deborah Sellmeyer; Erik Fink Eriksen; Steven R Cummings Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Barbara M Obermayer-Pietsch; Fernando Marin; Eugene V McCloskey; Peyman Hadji; Jordi Farrerons; Steven Boonen; Maurice Audran; Clare Barker; Athanasios D Anastasilakis; William D Fraser; Thomas Nickelsen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Karl J Jepsen; Bin Hu; Steven M Tommasini; Hayden-William Courtland; Christopher Price; Carl J Terranova; Joseph H Nadeau Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2007-06-08 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Katherine M Powell; Cayla Skaggs; Alexis Pulliam; Alycia Berman; Matthew R Allen; Joseph M Wallace Journal: Bone Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Catherine N Withers; Drew M Brown; Innocent Byiringiro; Matthew R Allen; Keith W Condon; Jonathan Satin; Douglas A Andres Journal: Bone Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Cory N Meixner; Mohammad W Aref; Aryaman Gupta; Erin M B McNerny; Drew Brown; Joseph M Wallace; Matthew R Allen Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Elizabeth A Swallow; Corinne E Metzger; Neal X Chen; Joseph M Wallace; Samantha P Tippen; Rachel Kohler; Sharon M Moe; Matthew R Allen Journal: Bone Rep Date: 2022-02-07
Authors: Samuel Monzem; Rafael Y Ballester; Behzad Javaheri; Blandine Poulet; Dábila A Sônego; Andrew A Pitsillides; Roberto L Souza Journal: Bone Jt Open Date: 2020-09-01