Literature DB >> 27817928

Association of groundwater constituents with topography and distance to unconventional gas wells in NE Pennsylvania.

Beizhan Yan1, Martin Stute2, Reynold A Panettieri3, James Ross4, Brian Mailloux5, Matthew J Neidell6, Lissa Soares5, Marilyn Howarth7, Xinhua Liu8, Pouné Saberi7, Steven N Chillrud4.   

Abstract

Recently we reported an association of certain diseases with unconventional gas development (UGD). The purpose of this study is to examine UGD's possible impacts on groundwater quality in northeastern Pennsylvania. In this study, we compared our groundwater data (Columbia 58 samples) with those published data from Cabot (1701 samples) and Duke University (150 samples). For each dataset, proportions of samples with elevated levels of dissolved constituents were compared among four groups, identified as upland far (i.e. ≥1km to the nearest UGD gas well), upland near (<1km), valley far (≥1km), and valley near (<1km) groups. The Columbia data do not show statistically significant differences among the 4 groups, probably due to the limited number of samples. In Duke samples, Ca and CI levels are significantly higher in the valley near group than in the valley far group. In the Cabot dataset, methane, Na, and Mn levels are significantly higher in valley far samples than in upland far samples. In valley samples, Ca, Cl, SO4, and Fe are significantly higher in the near group (i.e. <1km) than in the far group. The association of these constituents in valley groundwater with distance is observed for the first time using a large industry dataset. The increase may be caused by enhanced mixing of shallow and deep groundwater in valley, possibly triggered by UGD process. If persistent, these changes indicate potential for further impact on groundwater quality. Therefore, there is an urgent need to conduct more studies to investigate effects of UGD on water quality and possible health outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distance to gas wells; Environmental impacts; Groundwater; Hydraulic fracturing; Marcellus shale; Unconventional gas development

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27817928      PMCID: PMC5116425          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  19 in total

Review 1.  Environmental contamination due to shale gas development.

Authors:  M P J A Annevelink; J A J Meesters; A J Hendriks
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Spatial analysis of environment and population at risk of natural gas fracking in the state of Pennsylvania, USA.

Authors:  Qingmin Meng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  An evaluation of water quality in private drinking water wells near natural gas extraction sites in the Barnett Shale formation.

Authors:  Brian E Fontenot; Laura R Hunt; Zacariah L Hildenbrand; Doug D Carlton; Hyppolite Oka; Jayme L Walton; Dan Hopkins; Alexandra Osorio; Bryan Bjorndal; Qinhong H Hu; Kevin A Schug
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Sheila M Olmstead; Lucija A Muehlenbachs; Jhih-Shyang Shih; Ziyan Chu; Alan J Krupnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales.

Authors:  Thomas H Darrah; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert J Poreda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Groundwater protection and unconventional gas extraction: the critical need for field-based hydrogeological research.

Authors:  R E Jackson; A W Gorody; B Mayer; J W Roy; M C Ryan; D R Van Stempvoort
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 7.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Association Between Unconventional Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale and Asthma Exacerbations.

Authors:  Sara G Rasmussen; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Meredith McCormack; Joan A Casey; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Dione G Mercer; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Impacts of shale gas wastewater disposal on water quality in western Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Warner; Cidney A Christie; Robert B Jackson; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Perinatal outcomes and unconventional natural gas operations in Southwest Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Shaina L Stacy; LuAnn L Brink; Jacob C Larkin; Yoel Sadovsky; Bernard D Goldstein; Bruce R Pitt; Evelyn O Talbott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.