| Literature DB >> 27817928 |
Beizhan Yan1, Martin Stute2, Reynold A Panettieri3, James Ross4, Brian Mailloux5, Matthew J Neidell6, Lissa Soares5, Marilyn Howarth7, Xinhua Liu8, Pouné Saberi7, Steven N Chillrud4.
Abstract
Recently we reported an association of certain diseases with unconventional gas development (UGD). The purpose of this study is to examine UGD's possible impacts on groundwater quality in northeastern Pennsylvania. In this study, we compared our groundwater data (Columbia 58 samples) with those published data from Cabot (1701 samples) and Duke University (150 samples). For each dataset, proportions of samples with elevated levels of dissolved constituents were compared among four groups, identified as upland far (i.e. ≥1km to the nearest UGD gas well), upland near (<1km), valley far (≥1km), and valley near (<1km) groups. The Columbia data do not show statistically significant differences among the 4 groups, probably due to the limited number of samples. In Duke samples, Ca and CI levels are significantly higher in the valley near group than in the valley far group. In the Cabot dataset, methane, Na, and Mn levels are significantly higher in valley far samples than in upland far samples. In valley samples, Ca, Cl, SO4, and Fe are significantly higher in the near group (i.e. <1km) than in the far group. The association of these constituents in valley groundwater with distance is observed for the first time using a large industry dataset. The increase may be caused by enhanced mixing of shallow and deep groundwater in valley, possibly triggered by UGD process. If persistent, these changes indicate potential for further impact on groundwater quality. Therefore, there is an urgent need to conduct more studies to investigate effects of UGD on water quality and possible health outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Distance to gas wells; Environmental impacts; Groundwater; Hydraulic fracturing; Marcellus shale; Unconventional gas development
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27817928 PMCID: PMC5116425 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963