Juan Francisco Ruiz-Rabelo1, Elena Navarro-Rodriguez2, Leandro Luigi Di-Stasi3, Nelida Diaz-Jimenez4, Juan Cabrera-Bermon5, Carlos Diaz-Iglesias6, Manuel Gomez-Alvarez7, Javier Briceño-Delgado8. 1. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. ruizrabelo@aecirujanos.es. 2. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. helenanr1@hotmail.com. 3. Cognitive Ergonomics Group, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, C/ Campus de la Cartuja SN, CP:18075, Granada, Spain. leandro.distasi@gmail.com. 4. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. nelida.diaz.jimenez@gmail.com. 5. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. juancabrerabermon@gmail.com. 6. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. cjdi@hotmail.com. 7. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. gomezalv@hotmail.com. 8. General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. javibriceno@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fatigue and mental workload are directly associated with high-complexity tasks. In general, difficult tasks produce a higher mental workload, leaving little opportunity to deal with new/unexpected events and increasing the likelihood of performance errors. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) learning curve is considered to be one of the most difficult to complete in laparoscopic surgery. We wished to validate the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) in LRYGB and identify factors that could provoke a higher mental workload for surgeons during the learning curve. METHODS: A single surgeon was enrolled to undertake 70 consecutive LRYGB procedures with two internal surgeons mentoring the first 35 cases. Patients were consecutive and ranked from case 35 to case 105 according to the date of the surgical procedure ("case rank"). Self-ratings of satisfaction, performance, and fatigue were measured at the end of surgery using a validated NASA-TLX questionnaire. The procedure was recorded for later viewing by two external evaluators. General data for patients and surgical variables were collected prospectively. RESULTS: A moderate correlation between the NASA-TLX score, BMI, operative time, and volumes of blood drainage was observed. There was no correlation between the NASA-TLX score and duration of hospital stay or time of drain removal. BMI ≥50 kg/m(2), male sex, inexperienced first assistant, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictive factors of a higher NASA-TLX score. CONCLUSIONS: The NASA-TLX is a valid tool to gauge mental workload in LRYGB.
BACKGROUND:Fatigue and mental workload are directly associated with high-complexity tasks. In general, difficult tasks produce a higher mental workload, leaving little opportunity to deal with new/unexpected events and increasing the likelihood of performance errors. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) learning curve is considered to be one of the most difficult to complete in laparoscopic surgery. We wished to validate the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) in LRYGB and identify factors that could provoke a higher mental workload for surgeons during the learning curve. METHODS: A single surgeon was enrolled to undertake 70 consecutive LRYGB procedures with two internal surgeons mentoring the first 35 cases. Patients were consecutive and ranked from case 35 to case 105 according to the date of the surgical procedure ("case rank"). Self-ratings of satisfaction, performance, and fatigue were measured at the end of surgery using a validated NASA-TLX questionnaire. The procedure was recorded for later viewing by two external evaluators. General data for patients and surgical variables were collected prospectively. RESULTS: A moderate correlation between the NASA-TLX score, BMI, operative time, and volumes of blood drainage was observed. There was no correlation between the NASA-TLX score and duration of hospital stay or time of drain removal. BMI ≥50 kg/m(2), male sex, inexperienced first assistant, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictive factors of a higher NASA-TLX score. CONCLUSIONS: The NASA-TLX is a valid tool to gauge mental workload in LRYGB.
Authors: Bin Zheng; Xianta Jiang; Geoffrey Tien; Adam Meneghetti; O Neely M Panton; M Stella Atkins Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Dimitrios Stefanidis; Fikre Wang; James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Manfred Blobner; Christiane G Frick; Roland B Stäuble; Hubertus Feussner; Stefan J Schaller; Christoph Unterbuchner; Charlotte Lingg; Martina Geisler; Heidrun Fink Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Yuliya Y Yurko; Mark W Scerbo; Ajita S Prabhu; Christina E Acker; Dimitrios Stefanidis Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Garth H Ballantyne; Jonathan Svahn; Rafael F Capella; Joseph F Capella; Hans J Schmidt; Annette Wasielewski; Richard J Davies Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Shannon Melissa Chan; Hon Chi Yip; Vivien Wai Yin Wong; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Enders Kwok Wai Ng Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jessica H Nguyen; Jian Chen; Sandra P Marshall; Saum Ghodoussipour; Andrew Chen; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Roger D Dias; Heather M Conboy; Jennifer M Gabany; Lori A Clarke; Leon J Osterweil; George S Avrunin; David Arney; Julian M Goldman; Giuseppe Riccardi; Steven J Yule; Marco A Zenati Journal: IEEE Int Interdiscip Conf Cogn Methods Situat Aware Decis Support Date: 2018-08-02
Authors: Chuhao Wu; Jackie Cha; Jay Sulek; Chandru P Sundaram; Juan Wachs; Robert W Proctor; Denny Yu Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Lauren V Huckaby; Anthony R Cyr; Robert M Handzel; Eliza Beth Littleton; Lawrence R Crist; James D Luketich; Kenneth K Lee; Rajeev Dhupar Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Elba Mauriz; Sandra Caloca-Amber; Lucía Córdoba-Murga; Ana María Vázquez-Casares Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 3.390