Literature DB >> 21330808

Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool.

Yuliya Y Yurko1, Mark W Scerbo, Ajita S Prabhu, Christina E Acker, Dimitrios Stefanidis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increased workload during task performance may increase fatigue and facilitate errors. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) is a previously validated tool for workload self-assessment. We assessed the relationship of workload and performance during simulator training on a complex laparoscopic task.
METHODS: NASA-TLX workload data from three separate trials were analyzed. All participants were novices (n = 28), followed the same curriculum on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery suturing model, and were tested in the animal operating room (OR) on a Nissen fundoplication model after training. Performance and workload scores were recorded at baseline, after proficiency achievement, and during the test. Performance, NASA-TLX scores, and inadvertent injuries during the test were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Workload scores declined during training and mirrored performance changes. NASA-TLX scores correlated significantly with performance scores (r = -0.5, P < 0.001). Participants with higher workload scores caused more inadvertent injuries to adjacent structures in the OR (r = 0.38, P < 0.05). Increased mental and physical workload scores at baseline correlated with higher workload scores in the OR (r = 0.52-0.82; P < 0.05) and more inadvertent injuries (r = 0.52, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased workload is associated with inferior task performance and higher likelihood of errors. The NASA-TLX questionnaire accurately reflects workload changes during simulator training and may identify individuals more likely to experience high workload and more prone to errors during skill transfer to the clinical environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21330808     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e3f329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  56 in total

1.  Does fellow participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass affect perioperative outcomes?

Authors:  Neil H Bhayani; Aditya Gupta; Ashwin A Kurian; Christy M Dunst; Ahmed H Sharata; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanstrom; Valerie J Halpin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Raaj K Ruparel; David A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Training improves laparoscopic tasks performance and decreases operator workload.

Authors:  Jesse S L Hu; Jirong Lu; Wee Boon Tan; Davide Lomanto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Development of a fundamentals of endoscopic surgery proficiency-based skills curriculum for general surgery residents.

Authors:  Tomoko Mizota; Nicholas E Anton; Elizabeth M Huffman; Michael J Guzman; Frederick Lane; Jennifer N Choi; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomized controlled trial of EndoWrist-enabled robotic versus human laparoendoscopic single-site access surgery (LESS) in the porcine model.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Shannon Melissa Chan; Hon Chi Yip; Vivien Wai Yin Wong; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  A survey of context recognition in surgery.

Authors:  Igor Pernek; Alois Ferscha
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Differences in mental workload between traditional and single-incision laparoscopic procedures measured with a secondary task.

Authors:  Mark W Scerbo; Rebecca C Britt; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

Authors:  Sandeep Krishan Nayar; Liam Musto; Roland Fernandes; Rasiah Bharathan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Physical and Mental Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on the Surgeon: French vs. American Positions. A Randomized and Controlled Study.

Authors:  José E Carmona; Jorge A Higuerey; Doubraska Gil; Mabel Castillo; Valentina Escalona
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum.

Authors:  Justin Bric; Michael Connolly; Andrew Kastenmeier; Matthew Goldblatt; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.