Literature DB >> 26458548

Highly efficient CRISPR/HDR-mediated knock-in for mouse embryonic stem cells and zygotes.

Bangmei Wang1, Kunyu Li1, Amy Wang1, Michelle Reiser1, Thom Saunders2, Richard F Lockey1,3, Jia-Wang Wang1.   

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) gene editing technique, based on the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, has been used to generate gene knock-outs with variable sizes of small insertion/deletions with high efficiency. More precise genome editing, either the insertion or deletion of a desired fragment, can be done by combining the homology-directed-repair (HDR) pathway with CRISPR cleavage. However, HDR-mediated gene knock-in experiments are typically inefficient, and there have been no reports of successful gene knock-in with DNA fragments larger than 4 kb. Here, we describe the targeted insertion of large DNA fragments (7.4 and 5.8 kb) into the genomes of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and zygotes, respectively, using the CRISPR/HDR technique without NHEJ inhibitors. Our data show that CRISPR/HDR without NHEJ inhibitors can result in highly efficient gene knock-in, equivalent to CRISPR/HDR with NHEJ inhibitors. Although NHEJ is the dominant repair pathway associated with CRISPR-mediated double-strand breaks (DSBs), and biallelic gene knock-ins are common, NHEJ and biallelic gene knock-ins were not detected. Our results demonstrate that efficient targeted insertion of large DNA fragments without NHEJ inhibitors is possible, a result that should stimulate interest in understanding the mechanisms of high efficiency CRISPR targeting in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR cleavage; double-strand break (DSB); embryonic stem (ES) cells; homology-directed-repair (HDR); zygote

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26458548     DOI: 10.2144/000114339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechniques        ISSN: 0736-6205            Impact factor:   1.993


  35 in total

Review 1.  A CRISPR Path to Engineering New Genetic Mouse Models for Cardiovascular Research.

Authors:  Joseph M Miano; Qiuyu Martin Zhu; Charles J Lowenstein
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 2.  Gene editing tools: state-of-the-art and the road ahead for the model and non-model fishes.

Authors:  Hirak Kumar Barman; Kiran Dashrath Rasal; Vemulawada Chakrapani; A S Ninawe; Doyil T Vengayil; Syed Asrafuzzaman; Jitendra K Sundaray; Pallipuram Jayasankar
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  What rheumatologists need to know about CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Gary J Gibson; Maozhou Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 4.  Ways of improving precise knock-in by genome-editing technologies.

Authors:  Svetlana A Smirnikhina; Arina A Anuchina; Alexander V Lavrov
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Efficient Generation and Editing of Feeder-free IPSCs from Human Pancreatic Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System.

Authors:  Anjali Nandal; Barbara Mallon; Bhanu P Telugu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes.

Authors:  Sean Chen; Benjamin Lee; Angus Yiu-Fai Lee; Andrew J Modzelewski; Lin He
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Enabling large-scale genome editing at repetitive elements by reducing DNA nicking.

Authors:  Cory J Smith; Oscar Castanon; Khaled Said; Verena Volf; Parastoo Khoshakhlagh; Amanda Hornick; Raphael Ferreira; Chun-Ting Wu; Marc Güell; Shilpa Garg; Alex H M Ng; Hannu Myllykallio; George M Church
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  An efficient platform for generating somatic point mutations with germline transmission in the zebrafish by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing.

Authors:  Yibo Zhang; Zhiwei Zhang; Wei Ge
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Easi-CRISPR for creating knock-in and conditional knockout mouse models using long ssDNA donors.

Authors:  Hiromi Miura; Rolen M Quadros; Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Masato Ohtsuka
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Cell derived extracellular matrix fibers synthesized using sacrificial hollow fiber membranes.

Authors:  Kevin Roberts; Jacob Schluns; Addison Walker; Jake D Jones; Kyle P Quinn; Jamie Hestekin; Jeffrey C Wolchok
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.