Literature DB >> 27151215

Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes.

Sean Chen1, Benjamin Lee1, Angus Yiu-Fai Lee1, Andrew J Modzelewski2, Lin He3.   

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been employed to efficiently edit the genomes of diverse model organisms. CRISPR-mediated mouse genome editing is typically accomplished by microinjection of Cas9 DNA/RNA and single guide RNA (sgRNA) into zygotes to generate modified animals in one step. However, microinjection is a technically demanding, labor-intensive, and costly procedure with poor embryo viability. Here, we describe a simple and economic electroporation-based strategy to deliver Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoproteins into mouse zygotes with 100% efficiency for in vivo genome editing. Our methodology, designated as CRISPR RNP Electroporation of Zygotes (CRISPR-EZ), enables highly efficient and high-throughput genome editing in vivo, with a significant improvement in embryo viability compared with microinjection. Using CRISPR-EZ, we generated a variety of editing schemes in mouse embryos, including indel (insertion/deletion) mutations, point mutations, large deletions, and small insertions. In a proof-of-principle experiment, we used CRISPR-EZ to target the tyrosinase (Tyr) gene, achieving 88% bi-allelic editing and 42% homology-directed repair-mediated precise sequence modification in live mice. Taken together, CRISPR-EZ is simple, economic, high throughput, and highly efficient with the potential to replace microinjection for in vivo genome editing in mice and possibly in other mammals.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR, Cas9, Genome Editing, Electroporation, RNP; gene knockout; genetics; mouse; ribonuclear protein (RNP); tyrosinase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27151215      PMCID: PMC4938170          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  49 in total

1.  Targeted genome modification in mice using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Iara D Carbery; Diana Ji; Anne Harrington; Victoria Brown; Edward J Weinstein; Lucy Liaw; Xiaoxia Cui
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Christopher E Nelson; Chady H Hakim; David G Ousterout; Pratiksha I Thakore; Eirik A Moreb; Ruth M Castellanos Rivera; Sarina Madhavan; Xiufang Pan; F Ann Ran; Winston X Yan; Aravind Asokan; Feng Zhang; Dongsheng Duan; Charles A Gersbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Jeffrey C Miller; Ya-Li Lee; Christian M Beausejour; Jeremy M Rock; Sheldon Augustus; Andrew C Jamieson; Matthew H Porteus; Philip D Gregory; Michael C Holmes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Gene targeting in mice: functional analysis of the mammalian genome for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Simple and rapid in vivo generation of chromosomal rearrangements using CRISPR/Cas9 technology.

Authors:  Rafael B Blasco; Elif Karaca; Chiara Ambrogio; Taek-Chin Cheong; Emre Karayol; Valerio G Minero; Claudia Voena; Roberto Chiarle
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  GONAD: Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery system: a novel microinjection independent genome engineering method in mice.

Authors:  Gou Takahashi; Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Kenta Wada; Hiromi Miura; Masahiro Sato; Masato Ohtsuka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Mice by Zygote Electroporation of Nuclease.

Authors:  Wenning Qin; Stephanie L Dion; Peter M Kutny; Yingfan Zhang; Albert W Cheng; Nathaniel L Jillette; Ankit Malhotra; Aron M Geurts; Yi-Guang Chen; Haoyi Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Baohui Chen; Luke A Gilbert; Beth A Cimini; Joerg Schnitzbauer; Wei Zhang; Gene-Wei Li; Jason Park; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi; Bo Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Alexandra East; Aaron Cheng; Steven Lin; Enbo Ma; Jennifer Doudna
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  104 in total

Review 1.  Gene-edited CRISPy Critters for alcohol research.

Authors:  Gregg E Homanics
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 2.  Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ling Li; Shuo Hu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complex Delivery: Methods and Applications for Neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Lee A Campbell; Christopher T Richie; Nishad S Maggirwar; Brandon K Harvey
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Simplified pipelines for genetic engineering of mammalian embryos by CRISPR-Cas9 electroporation†.

Authors:  Deqiang Miao; Mariana Ianello Giassetti; Michela Ciccarelli; Blanca Lopez-Biladeau; Jon M Oatley
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human zygotes using Cas9 protein.

Authors:  Lichun Tang; Yanting Zeng; Hongzi Du; Mengmeng Gong; Jin Peng; Buxi Zhang; Ming Lei; Fang Zhao; Weihua Wang; Xiaowei Li; Jianqiao Liu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  UFMylation inhibits the proinflammatory capacity of interferon-γ-activated macrophages.

Authors:  Dale R Balce; Ya-Ting Wang; Michael R McAllaster; Bria F Dunlap; Anthony Orvedahl; Barry L Hykes; Lindsay Droit; Scott A Handley; Craig B Wilen; John G Doench; Robert C Orchard; Christina L Stallings; Herbert W Virgin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Electroporation of AsCpf1/RNP at the Zygote Stage is an Efficient Genome Editing Method to Generate Knock-Out Mice Deficient in Leukemia Inhibitory Factor.

Authors:  Yeon Sun Kim; Gyeong Ryeong Kim; Mira Park; Seung Chel Yang; So Hee Park; Ji Eun Won; Ju Hee Lee; Ha Eun Shin; Haengseok Song; Hye-Ryun Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 8.  Cornerstones of CRISPR-Cas in drug discovery and therapy.

Authors:  Christof Fellmann; Benjamin G Gowen; Pei-Chun Lin; Jennifer A Doudna; Jacob E Corn
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 9.  Messenger RNA Delivery for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications.

Authors:  Siddharth Patel; Avathamsa Athirasala; Paula P Menezes; N Ashwanikumar; Ting Zou; Gaurav Sahay; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  Host genetics in malaria: lessons from mouse studies.

Authors:  Hong Ming Huang; Brendan J McMorran; Simon J Foote; Gaetan Burgio
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.