Literature DB >> 26456047

Neural Encoding of Odors during Active Sampling and in Turbulent Plumes.

Stephen J Huston1, Mark Stopfer2, Stijn Cassenaer3, Zane N Aldworth2, Gilles Laurent4.   

Abstract

Sensory inputs are often fluctuating and intermittent, yet animals reliably utilize them to direct behavior. Here we ask how natural stimulus fluctuations influence the dynamic neural encoding of odors. Using the locust olfactory system, we isolated two main causes of odor intermittency: chaotic odor plumes and active sampling behaviors. Despite their irregularity, chaotic odor plumes still drove dynamic neural response features including the synchronization, temporal patterning, and short-term plasticity of spiking in projection neurons, enabling classifier-based stimulus identification and activating downstream decoders (Kenyon cells). Locusts can also impose odor intermittency through active sampling movements with their unrestrained antennae. Odors triggered immediate, spatially targeted antennal scanning that, paradoxically, weakened individual neural responses. However, these frequent but weaker responses were highly informative about stimulus location. Thus, not only are odor-elicited dynamic neural responses compatible with natural stimulus fluctuations and important for stimulus identification, but locusts actively increase intermittency, possibly to improve stimulus localization.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26456047      PMCID: PMC4742573          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  56 in total

1.  Rapid olfactory processing implicates subcortical control of an olfactomotor system.

Authors:  Bradley N Johnson; Joel D Mainland; Noam Sobel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A simple connectivity scheme for sparse coding in an olfactory system.

Authors:  Ron A Jortner; S Sarah Farivar; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Odour encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies.

Authors:  M Wehr; G Laurent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Rats track odour trails accurately using a multi-layered strategy with near-optimal sampling.

Authors:  Adil Ghani Khan; Manaswini Sarangi; Upinder Singh Bhalla
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Lobster sniffing: antennule design and hydrodynamic filtering of information in an odor plume.

Authors:  M A Koehl; J R Koseff; J P Crimaldi; M G McCay; T Cooper; M B Wiley; P A Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Temporal structure of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb imaged in behaving rats.

Authors:  Ryan M Carey; Justus V Verhagen; Daniel W Wesson; Nicolás Pírez; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  In vivo whole-cell recording of odor-evoked synaptic transmission in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Jianhua Cang; Jeffry S Isaacson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response.

Authors:  Carlotta Martelli; John R Carlson; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Fast odor learning improves reliability of odor responses in the locust antennal lobe.

Authors:  Maxim Bazhenov; Mark Stopfer; Terrence J Sejnowski; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Sniffing by a silkworm moth: wing fanning enhances air penetration through and pheromone interception by antennae.

Authors:  C Loudon; M A Koehl
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  17 in total

1.  Adaptation of olfactory receptor abundances for efficient coding.

Authors:  Tiberiu Teşileanu; Simona Cocco; Rémi Monasson; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Algorithms for Olfactory Search across Species.

Authors:  Keeley L Baker; Michael Dickinson; Teresa M Findley; David H Gire; Matthieu Louis; Marie P Suver; Justus V Verhagen; Katherine I Nagel; Matthew C Smear
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Natural search algorithms as a bridge between organisms, evolution, and ecology.

Authors:  Andrew M Hein; Francesco Carrara; Douglas R Brumley; Roman Stocker; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Speech rhythms and their neural foundations.

Authors:  David Poeppel; M Florencia Assaneo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Smelling Time: A Neural Basis for Olfactory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Barry W Ache; Andrew M Hein; Yuriy V Bobkov; Jose C Principe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world.

Authors:  John Crimaldi; Hong Lei; Andreas Schaefer; Michael Schmuker; Brian H Smith; Aaron C True; Justus V Verhagen; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Sniff-Like Patterned Input Results in Long-Term Plasticity at the Rat Olfactory Bulb Mitral and Tufted Cell to Granule Cell Synapse.

Authors:  Mahua Chatterjee; Fernando Perez de Los Cobos Pallares; Alex Loebel; Michael Lukas; Veronica Egger
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 8.  Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species.

Authors:  Clara U Raithel; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 9.052

9.  Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm.

Authors:  Vincent Jacob; Christelle Monsempès; Jean-Pierre Rospars; Jean-Baptiste Masson; Philippe Lucas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A physicochemical model of odor sampling.

Authors:  Mitchell E Gronowitz; Adam Liu; Qiang Qiu; C Ron Yu; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.